Home › Campaigns › Banks and Climate › Banks and fossil fuel financing

Banks and coal

Start

Documents

News

Media

Links

The Tanjung Jati B coal power plant in Jepara, Central Java. Photo: Kemal Jufri / Greenpeace

Start

Documents

News

Media

Links

Further sections

By: BankTrack

2022-04-04 17:59:43

Contact:

For any feedback or questions on this page please contact us at
climate@banktrack.org

Share this page:

The Tanjung Jati B coal power plant in Jepara, Central Java. Photo: Kemal Jufri / Greenpeace

Go to coal financing policy table

Banks and coal

From concerns over air pollution and acid rain to its destructive impact on the climate, coal has long been recognised as the dirtiest, most polluting fossil fuel and historically the leading cause of climate change. Globally, the biggest source of carbon dioxide is burning of coal - greater than burning oil or gas, or carbon dioxide emissions caused by deforestation.

These facts have been well established for some time, which has led to coal being the most heavily opposed of all fossil fuels, whether by Indigenous populations, civil society organisations, the general public or the scientific community. Due to this opposition, worldwide emissions from burning coal have been leveling off over the last decade, while emissions from oil and gas continued to rise. However, the trend in emissions from burning coal shows a clear geographical distribution: coal is on the decline in the OECD and EU countries, while it's still on the rise in many parts of Africa, Asia and South America. At the same time, coal mining operations and coal power plants are facing more and more financial difficulties due to the plunging cost of renewable energy and cheap natural gas.

Coal's fast decline

In some parts of the world, like the US and EU, coal has already started its inevitable decline. However, the pace at which coal is declining is nowhere near the pace of decline which is required to stay within the 1.5 degrees target of the Paris Climate Agreement. In order to meet the 1.5 degrees goal, global carbon dioxide emissions must be more than halved from 2010 levels by 2030 and reach ‘net zero’ by 2050. This gives a 50% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees temperature increase by 2100.

However, coal emissions need to fall about twice as fast as those for oil and gas in the 2020s, which means that global coal emissions should decline by about 80% from 14.5 gigatons CO2 in 2019, to 3.1 gigatons CO2 in 2030. Most developed regions in the world, like the EU, OECD countries and Russia, therefore need to exit coal at the latest by 2030, with the rest of the world following by 2040 at the latest. This means that no new coal mining, coal power or coal infrastructure can be built, and a significant part of the coal industry needs to close before the end of its planned operational lifetime.

Therefore, financing of new coal projects and the companies behind them is incompatible with the temperature goals set in the Paris Climate Agreement. Banks must end support for all new coal activities and implement a full phase-out for financing coal projects and companies in line with the 2030-2040 deadline.

Despite an increase in the number of banks that have restricted or ended their financing for the coal sector, too many banks continue to finance the dirtiest of fossil fuels, making it increasingly hard to avoid climate breakdown. Fifty of the biggest banks in the world have financed coal mining and coal power to the tune of USD 381 billion since the Paris Climate Agreement (2016-2021). The three biggest coal financiers in the world since 2016 are Bank of China (USD 38.47 billion), ICBC (USD 34 billion) and China CITIC Bank (USD 33.95 billion).

See here for banks' exposure to fossil fuel expanders in 2016-2021.

At the bottom of this page you can find the campaign pages of up-to-date assessments of bank policies in the Banking on Climate Change report on coal mining, coal power and coal infrastructure.

Bank policy scores on coal (overall score)

The table below shows banks’ aggregate policy score on coal. The 'details' section in the table provides further detail on the exact scoring per bank for coal mining, coal power, and coal infrastructure.

Bank policy scores on coal financing

BankLast update

Country

Score

Ranking

Details

ABN AMRO

2020-03-01

NLD

Follower

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Undefined offset: 1

Filename: shared/tabletool_row.php

Line Number: 81

Backtrace:

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/views/sections/shared/tabletool_row.php
Line: 81
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/helpers/easy_helper.php
Line: 366
Function: view

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/views/sections/shared/tabletool.php
Line: 69
Function: lv

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/helpers/easy_helper.php
Line: 366
Function: view

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/libraries/sections/Tabletool.php
Line: 595
Function: lv

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/libraries/Shortcode.php
Line: 86
Function: shortcode

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/libraries/Shortcode.php
Line: 48
Function: callbackFunction

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/libraries/Shortcode.php
Line: 49
Function: preg_replace_callback

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/libraries/sections/Page.php
Line: 27
Function: replace_shortcode

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/libraries/sections/Campaign.php
Line: 16
Function: get_by_tag

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/controllers/Main.php
Line: 46
Function: get_by_tag

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/application/controllers/Main.php
Line: 223
Function: get

File: /home/btwebhost/www/btci3/index.php
Line: 314
Function: require_once

Netherlands

Profile

Score

Follower

20200301

Last update: 2020-03-01

Explanation

Total: 26 points out of 80

14 points out of 32 for coal mining policy: see here.

12 points out of 32 for coal power policy: see here.

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

Agricultural Bank of China

2021-03-24

CHN

Laggard