Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2022-06-02 00:00:00
GFANZ must tighten the screw on fossil fuel expansion
2022-05-19 00:00:00
BNP Paribas and Société Générale: stop financing climate destruction and human rights abuses
2022-05-04 00:00:00
Barclays is big on beef and burning
2022-05-04 00:00:00
Standard Chartered’s 2022 AGM dominated by shareholder alarm over fossil financing
2022-05-20 15:14:47
Seven financiers abandon TotalEnergies' EACOP pipeline in a week
2021-12-16 13:33:02
Cambo oil field "paused" following pressure on Shell & banks
2021-12-16 13:04:42
Equator Principles improve transparency after BankTrack shows the way
2021-11-02 11:03:26
ANZ launches human rights grievance mechanism in a first for the global banking sector
Connect
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
2022-03-08 00:00:00
BankTrack Annual Report 2021
2022-03-03 00:00:00
Locked out of a Just Transition: fossil fuel financing in Africa
2021-12-14 00:00:00
Actions speak louder: Assessing bank responses to human rights violations
2021-10-26 00:00:00
Equator Compliant Climate Destruction: How banks finance fossil fuels under the Equator Principles
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
Banking on Climate Chaos 2021: World’s 60 largest banks have poured USD 3.8 trillion into fossil fuels since Paris Agreement
Even amidst the global economic downturn, fossil fuel financing numbers were higher in 2020 than 2016
Start
Banks
Dodgy Deals

By: BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance & Sierra Club
2021-03-24
Nijmegen

Contact:

Laurel Sutherlin, Senior Communications Strategist, Rainforest Action Network

Johan Frijns, Director, BankTrack

Ernst-Jan Kuiper, Climate Campaigner, BankTrack


Share this page:

Banking on Climate Chaos 2021. Photo: Rainforest Action Network
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Released today, the 12th edition of the most comprehensive report on fossil fuel bank financing documents an alarming disconnect between the global scientific consensus on climate change and the continued practices of the world’s largest banks. This year’s report, titled Banking on Climate Chaos 2021, expands its focus from 35 to 60 of the world’s largest banks and reveals that in the 5 years since the Paris Agreement was adopted, these banks have pumped over USD 3.8 trillion into the fossil fuel industry. The report also concludes that fossil fuel financing was higher in 2020 than in 2016, a trend that stands in direct opposition to the Agreement’s stated goal of rapidly reducing carbon emissions with the aim to limit global temperature rise to 1.5° Celsius.

The report demonstrates that, even amidst a pandemic-induced recession that resulted in an across-the-board reduction of fossil fuel financing of roughly 9%, the world’s 60 largest banks still increased their financing in 2020 to the 100 companies most responsible for fossil fuel expansion by over 10%. These banks have poured nearly USD 1.5 trillion over the past 5 years into 100 top companies expanding fossil fuels. This includes companies behind highly controversial projects like the Line 3 tar sands oil pipeline cutting through the state of Minnesota in the US and the expansion of fracking on the land of Indigenous Mapuche communities in Argentina’s Patagonia region, which are just two of the nearly 20 case studies featured in the report.

Banking on Climate Chaos was authored by Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, and Sierra Club, and is endorsed by over 300 organizations from 50 countries around the world. 

U.S.-based banks continue to be the largest global drivers of emissions in 2020, with JPMorgan Chase remaining the world’s worst fossil bank. Chase recently committed to align its financing with the Paris Agreement and yet continues essentially unrestrained financing of fossil fuels. From 2016 through 2020, Chase’s lending and underwriting activities have provided nearly USD 317 billion to fossil fuels, fully 33% more than Citi, the next worst fossil bank over this period.

Wells Fargo’s total fossil financing plunged by a surprising 42% in 2020. As a result, Wells dropped from fourth-worst fossil bank in 2019, to ninth worst in 2020. This is the only time over the past five years that Wells has not been one of the worst four fossil banks. Another surprising result from the 2020 data is that BNP Paribas (whose U.S. subsidiary is Bank of the West, which strongly advertises its supposed responsibility on climate) came in as the fourth-worst fossil bank in 2020. BNP Paribas provided USD 41 billion in fossil financing in 2020, a huge 41% increase over its 2019 activity. This means the biggest absolute increase in fossil financing last year came from BNP Paribas, despite the bank’s strong policy commitments restricting financing for unconventional oil and gas.

The report also examines existing climate policy commitments by banks and finds them grossly insufficient and out of alignment with the goals of the Paris Agreement across the board. Recent high profile bank policies focus either on the distant and ill-defined goal of achieving ‘net zero by 2050’ or on restricting financing for unconventional fossil fuels. In general, existing bank policies are strongest with regards to restrictions for direct project-related financing. And yet, project-related financing made up only 5% of the total fossil fuel financing analyzed in this report. 

The authoring organizations behind this report are united in their demand that respect for Indigenous rights, including the right to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, and human rights more broadly must be a non-negotiable requirement for all bank financing decisions. 

This report names the largest funders of fossil fuels around the world, with JPMorgan Chase the worst overall, RBC the worst in Canada, Barclays the worst in the UK, BNP Paribas worst in the EU, MUFG worst in Japan and Bank of China worst in China.

Rainforest Action Network - Ginger Cassady, Executive Director:
“The unprecedented COVID-19 dip in global financing for fossil fuels offers the world’s largest banks a stark choice point going forward; they can decide to lock in the downward trajectory of support for the primary industry driving the climate crisis or they can recklessly snap back to business as usual as the economy recovers. U.S.-based banks continue to be the worst financiers of fossil fuels by a wide margin. Going into the Glasgow climate summit at the end of the year, the stakes could not be higher. Wall Street must act now to stop financing fossil expansion and commit to fossil zero, so as to truly align its financing practices with keeping our planet from heating up more than 1.5 degrees.”

Indigenous Environmental Network - Tom Goldtooth, Executive Director:
“We must understand that by bankrolling the expansion of oil and gas the top banks of the world have blood on their hands and no amount of greenwashing, carbon markets, unproven techno-fixes, or net-zero commitments can absolve their crimes against humanity and Mother Earth. Indigenous lands globally are being plundered, our inherent rights are being violated and the value of our lives has been diminished to nothing in the face of fossil fuel expansion. For the sacredness and the territorial integrity of Mother Earth, these banks must be held accountable for covering the cost of her destruction.”

Reclaim Finance - Lucie Pinson, Founder and Executive Director:
“These numbers expose the hollowness of banks’ ever-multiplying commitments to be net-zero or align with the Paris Agreement climate targets. A perfect example can be found in France. Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire is fond of calling Paris the capital of green finance – but this data exposes it as 2020's capital of climate hypocrisy, with four unscrupulous banks making France the largest backer of oil, gas and coal in Europe. BNP Paribas merits singling out as the world’s fourth-largest fossil financier in 2020, having funnelled multi-billion dollar loans to oil giants like BP and Total. Nonetheless, it's clear that all banks need to replace empty promises with meaningful policies enacting zero tolerance for fossil fuel developers.”

Sierra Club - Ben Cushing, Financial Advocacy Campaign Manager:
“Many of the world’s largest banks, including all six major U.S. banks, have made splashy commitments in recent months to zero-out the climate impact of their financing over the next 30 years. But what matters most is what they’re doing now, and the numbers don’t lie. This report separates words from actions, and the picture it paints is alarming: major banks around the world, led by U.S. banks in particular, are fueling climate chaos by dumping trillions of dollars into the fossil fuels that are causing the crisis. Big banks don’t deserve a pat on the back if their 2050 pledges are not paired with meaningful 2021 actions to cut fossil financing.”

BankTrack - Johan Frijns, Director:
“As the date of the crucial Glasgow Climate Summit approaches - and god forbid the global corona crisis prevents the world from meeting to address that other, much bigger existential crisis - we witness one bank after another making solemn promises to become ‘net zero by 2050’. There exists no pathway towards this laudable goal of a generation away that does not require dealing with bank finance for the fossil fuel industry right here and now, yet too many current promises lack precisely that; a firm commitment to start severing ties with all coal, oil and gas companies that plan on continuing their climate wrecking activities in the years to come.”

Oil Change International - Lorne Stockman, Senior Research Analyst:
“This report serves as a reality check for banks that think that vague ‘net-zero’ goals are enough to stop the climate crisis. Our future goes where the money flows, and in 2020 these banks have ploughed billions into locking us into further climate chaos. Banks need to be focused on reducing fossil fuel production now, rather than on a far off and insufficient goal in the distant future. The time for half-measures is over.”


Methodology note:
This report aggregates bank lending and underwriting of debt and equity issuances according to Bloomberg’s league credit methodology (which divides credit among banks leading a transaction) to companies with any reported fossil fuel activity according to Bloomberg Finance L.P. and the
Global Coal Exit List. The league credit assigned to a bank for a given transaction is adjusted by an approximation of the fossil fuel intensity of the particular borrower or issuer. Draft report findings are shared with banks in advance, and they are given an opportunity to comment on financing and policy assessments.

Policy assessment note:
All the assessments of fossil fuel related financing policies of the 60 banks covered in the Banking on Climate Chaos report have been fully integrated into the policy assessment tables on the BankTrack website. The full range of these assessments can be accessed here. 

Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related banks

Agricultural Bank of China China

active

ANZ Australia

active

Banco Santander Spain

active

Bank of America United States

active

Bank of China China

active

Bank of Communications China

active

Bank of Montreal (BMO) Canada

active

Barclays United Kingdom

active

BBVA Spain

active

BNP Paribas France

active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Canada

active

China CITIC Bank China

active

China Construction Bank China

active

China Everbright Bank China

active

China Merchants Bank China

active

China Minsheng Bank China

active

Citi United States

active

Commerzbank Germany

active

Commonwealth Bank Australia

active

Crédit Agricole France

active

Crédit Mutuel France

active

Credit Suisse Switzerland

active

Danske Bank Denmark

active

Deutsche Bank Germany

active

DZ Bank Germany

active

Goldman Sachs United States

active

HSBC United Kingdom

active

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) China

active

Industrial Bank China

active

ING Netherlands

active

Intesa Sanpaolo Italy

active

JPMorgan Chase United States

active

Lloyds Banking Group United Kingdom

active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Japan

active

Mizuho Financial Group Japan

active

Morgan Stanley United States

active

National Australia Bank (NAB) Australia

active

Natixis France

active

NatWest Group United Kingdom

active

Nordea Finland

active

Ping An Bank China

active

Postal Savings Bank of China China

active

Rabobank Netherlands

active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Canada

active

Sberbank Russian Federation

active

Scotiabank Canada

active

Shanghai Pudong Development Bank China

active

Shinhan Financial Group South Korea

active

Société Générale France

active

Standard Chartered United Kingdom

active

State Bank of India India

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Japan

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Japan

active

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank) Canada

active

Truist Financial Corporation United States

active

U.S. Bancorp United States

active

UBS Switzerland

active

UniCredit Italy

active

Wells Fargo United States

active

Westpac Australia

active
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related Dodgy Deals

Projects

active

Carmichael coal mine project Australia

Coal Mining
active

Coastal GasLink pipeline Canada

Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
target

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) Uganda

Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil
active

Emba Hunutlu coal power plant Turkey

Coal Electric Power Generation
target

Mozambique LNG Mozambique

LNG Terminal | Oil and Gas Extraction | Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
active

Vaca Muerta Shale Basin Argentina

Oil and Gas Extraction | Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil | Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
There are no projects active for this item now.
on record

Line 3 Pipeline Replacement Project (L3RP) United States

Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil
on record

Mountain Valley Pipeline United States

Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted