Banks| Dodgy Deals| Map| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2020-12-22 00:00:00
Blog: In 2020, the Equator Principles struggle to remain relevant
2020-12-14 00:00:00
The battle to stop Line 3 is heating up on the ground and across the US
2020-12-14 00:00:00
Corporate accountability and the just transition: Frameworks for holding corporations accountable for climate change
2020-12-12 00:00:00
Five years since the Paris Agreement, are banks' 2050 pledges enough to reign in fossil fuel finance?
2020-09-24 12:53:20
Oscislowo open-pit coal mine cancelled
2020-09-08 13:07:41
Strengthened OECD guidance on responsible banking
2020-02-25 10:35:27
JPMorgan Chase Coal and Arctic Policy a step forward but fails to match its climate responsibility as the world’s #1 Fossil Bank
2020-02-18 17:27:23
Civil society groups welcome Royal Bank of Scotland preparing to exit fossil fuels
Connect
2020-11-30 00:00:00
Soft Commitments, Hard Lessons: an analysis of the Soft Commodities Compact
2020-11-24 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II
2020-11-18 00:00:00
Crude Risk: Risks to banks and investors from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline
2020-09-16 00:00:00
Principles for Paris-Aligned Financial Institutions: Climate Impact, Fossil Fuels and Deforestation
2020-08-17 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part I
2020-03-18 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Change - Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2020
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Home › Bank profiles
China Construction BankChina
About
Policies
Policy Assessments
Dodgy Deals
Dodgy Deals Map
Documents
News
Links

Active

This profile is actively maintained

Created before Nov 2016
Last update: 2020-04-03 12:27:46

Send feedback on this profile
Download as PDF
Share this page:

China Construction Bank head office in Beijing. Photo: 高晶 at Chinese Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 3.0)

About China Construction Bank

China Construction Bank (CCB), established in 1954, is a large commercial bank in China. CCB's business consists of corporate banking, personal banking, and treasury operations. It operates a network of 39 domestic branches and many sub-branches around mainland China. The bank operates overseas branches in Tokyo, Frankfurt, Ho Chi Minh City, New York, Seoul, Hong Kong, Sydney, Singapore, Johannesburg and a wholly owned subsidiary in London.

Website http://en.ccb.com/en/home/indexv3.html
Headquarters
25 Finance Street, Xicheng District
Beijing
China
CEO/chair Tian Guoli
Chairman, Executive Director
Supervisor
China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC)
Annual reports CSR Report 2018
Annual report 2019
Ownership
listed on Hong Kong Stock Exchange & Shanghai Stock Exchange

Central Huijin Investment (a state-owned investment company) holds a majority share of 57.11% in China Construction Bank.

Related Dodgy Deals

China Construction Bank has been linked to the following "Dodgy Deals", e.g. as a current or past financier or through an expression of interest. Find out more about dodgy deals here. See the project or company profile for more details on the nature of the bank's link to the Dodgy Deal.

Dodgy Deals map

All
|
Projects
|
Companies
Targets
|
Active profiles
|
On record profiles

Policy Assessments

Banks, climate and energy

Bank policy scores on fossil fuel financing

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0.5
0.5
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0.5
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0.5 point out of 200

0.5 point out of 120 for oil and gas policy.

0 points out of 80 for coal policy.

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

A bank can obtain a total of 200 policy points for its overall fossil fuel policies; 120 possible points for oil and gas policies and 80 possible points for coal policies. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-50 points), followers (50.5-100 points), front runners (100.5-150 points) or leaders (150.5-200 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on fossil fuel expansion

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 89

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The scores for a bank's policies restricting expansion of fossil fuels - in each area, prohibitions against financing projects and/or companies expanding that area - are aggregated into a fossil fuel expansion policy score.

The point-based policy ranking for fossil fuel expansion consists of the following distribution:

  • Coal mining: 14 points​
  • Coal power: 14 points
  • Other coal: 7 points
  • Tar sands: 9 points
  • Arctic oil and gas: 9 points
  • Offshore oil and gas: 9 points
  • Fracked oil and gas: 9 points
  • LNG: 9 points
  • Other oil and gas: 9 points

A bank can obtain a total of 89 policy points for its fossil fuel expansion policy. Based on this score, banks are then classified as laggards (0-22.25 points), followers (22.25-44.5 points), front runners (44.5-66.75 points) or leaders (66.75-89 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on oil and gas financing

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0.5
0.5
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0.5
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0.5 point out of 120

0.5 point out of 20 for other/conventional oil and gas: see here.

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

For each of the six subsectors, 20 possible policy points can be obtained, so a bank can obtain a total of 120 policy points for its oil and gas policies. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-30 points), followers (30.5-60 points), front runners (60.5-90 points) or leaders (90.5-120 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on tar sands

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 20

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking above assesses bank policies in four ways:

 1) Restriction on direct financing for tar sands projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1.5), moderate exclusion (3), strong exclusion (4)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand tar sands.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (3), strong exclusion (5)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for tar sands.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in tar sands above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 20 policy points for its tar sands policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-5 points), followers (5.5-10 points), front runners (10.5-15 points) or leaders (15.5-20 points). 

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on Arctic oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 20

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for Arctic oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1.5), moderate exclusion (3), strong exclusion (4)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand Arctic oil and gas. 

  • None (0), weak exclusion (3), strong exclusion (5)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for Arctic oil and gas.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in Arctic oil and gas above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 20 policy points for its Arctic oil and gas policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-5 points), followers (5.5-10 points), front runners (10.5-15 points) or leaders (15.5-20 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on offshore oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 20

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for offshore oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1.5), strong exclusion (4)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand offshore oil and gas.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (3), strong exclusion (5)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for offshore oil and gas.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in offshore oil and gas above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 20 policy points for its offshore oil and gas policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-5 points), followers (5.5-10 points), front runners (10.5-15 points) or leaders (15.5-20 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on fracked oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 20

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for fracked oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1.5), moderate exclusion (3), strong exclusion (4)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand oil and gas fracking.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (3), strong exclusion (5)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for oil and gas fracking.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in oil and gas fracking above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 20 policy points for its fracking policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-5 points), followers (5.5-10 points), front runners (10.5-15 points) or leaders (15.5-20 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on LNG

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 20

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for LNG projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1.5), strong exclusion (4)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand LNG.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (3), strong exclusion (5)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for LNG.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in LNG above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 20 policy points for its LNG policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-5 points), followers (5.5-10 points), front runners (10.5-15 points) or leaders (15.5-20 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on other/conventional oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0.5
0.5
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0.5
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0.5 point out of 20

0.5 point for enhanced due diligence/Equator Principles commitment regarding other/conventional oil and gas companies: China Construction Bank has a general environmental and social due diligence procedure.

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Relevant policies
csr policies
2018-09-30 00:00:00

Green, Social and Sustainability Bond Framework

2018-09-30 00:00:00
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for other/conventional oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1.5), strong exclusion (4)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand other/conventional oil and gas. 

  • None (0), weak exclusion (3), strong exclusion (5)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for other/conventional oil and gas.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in other/conventional oil and gas above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence/Equator Principles commitment (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 20 policy points for its other/conventional oil and gas policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-5 points), followers (5.5-10 points), front runners (10.5-15 points) or leaders (15.5-20 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal financing

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 80

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

For both coal mining and coal power, 32 possible policy points can be obtained, while for other coal,16 possible policy points can be obtained. So a bank can obtain a total of 80 policy points for its coal policies. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-20 points), followers (20.5-40 points), front runners (40.5-60 points) or leaders (60.5-80 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal mining

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 32

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for coal mining projects.

  • None (0), mountaintop removal mining exclusion (0.5), weak exclusion (2), moderate exclusion (4), strong exclusion (6)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand coal mining.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (4), strong exclusion (8)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for coal mining.

  • None (0), exposure reduction (1.5), financing reduction (3), weak phase-out (4), moderate phase-out (6), strong phase-out (8)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in coal mining above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (3), moderate exclusion threshold (5), strong exclusion threshold (8), full exclusion (10)

A bank can obtain a total of 32 policy points for its coal mining policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-8 points), followers (8.5-16 points), front runners (16.5-24 points) or leaders (24.5-32 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal power

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 32

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for coal power projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), moderate exclusion (4), strong exclusion (6)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand coal power.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (4), strong exclusion (8)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for coal power.

  • None (0), proportional reduction (1), exposure reduction (1.5), financing reduction (3), weak phase-out (4), moderate phase-out (6), strong phase-out (8)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in coal power above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (3), moderate exclusion threshold (5), strong exclusion threshold (8), full exclusion (10)

A bank can obtain a total of 32 policy points for its coal power policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-8 points), followers (8.5-16 points), front runners (16.5-24 points) or leaders (24.5-32 points).

For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal infrastructure

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
2020-03-01
CHN
0
0
0
China
Profile
Laggard
0
Follower
Front runner
Leader
1583017200
Last update: 2020-03-01
Explanation

Total: 0 points out of 20

See: Banking on Climate Change - policy scores

Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for coal infrastructure projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1), strong exclusion (3)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand coal infrastructure.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), strong exclusion (4)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for coal infrastructure.

  • None (0), exposure reduction (1), weak phase-out (2), strong phase-out (4)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in coal infrastructure above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (4), full exclusion (5)

A bank can obtain a total of 16 policy points for its coal infrastructure policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-4 points), followers (4.5-8 points), front runners (8.5-12 points) or leaders (12.5-16 points)

For more details see this page.

Banks and human rights

BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark 2019

BankLast update
Country
Details
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
China Construction Bank
CHN
100
China
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
Explanation

China Construction Bank's human rights policies, processes and reporting were assessed as part of the BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark in November 2019. The bank is assessed as a Laggard, with a total score of 0 out of 14.

Policy: 0/3
Due dilligence: 0/5
Reporting: 0/3
Remedy: 0/3

For more details see this page.

News

| |
Type:
Year:
blog
external news
our news

Will China continue to bank on coal?

2020-06-01 | Dry Cargo International
blog
external news
our news

265 Civil society groups call on Chinese actors to ensure that Covid-19 financial relief does not bail out harmful projects

2020-05-01 | BankTrack, Inclusive Development International
blog
external news
our news

Global finance sector failing to apply conservation criteria to pulp and paper funding

2020-03-21 | New York/Amsterdam | Environmental Paper Network
blog
external news
our news

Banking on Climate Change – Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2020

New report reveals global banks funneled USD 2.7 trillion into fossil fuels Since Paris Climate Agreement, with financing on the rise each year 
2020-03-18 | Nijmegen | BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
blog
external news
our news

4 out of 5 banks failing on human rights, new BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark shows

Lloyds, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Société Générale among the poorest performers in BankTrack ranking, alongside Canadian and Chinese banks
2019-11-26 | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

BankTrack 2019 Human Rights Benchmark: criteria and scope announced

2019-06-25 | Nijmegen | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

Global Banks, Led by JPMorgan Chase, Invested $1.9 Trillion in Fossil Fuels Since Paris Climate Pact

2019-03-20 | Desmogblog.com
blog
external news
our news

Banking on Climate Change – Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2019

World's top banks have poured $1.9 trillion into fossil fuel financing since the Paris Agreement was adopted, with financing on the rise each year
2019-03-20 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack, Honor the Earth, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club
blog
external news
our news

Banks massively financing fossil fuels unclear about future of ... fossil fuels

Few banks acknowledge relation between fossil fuels and climate breakdown
2018-12-20 | Nijmegen
blog
external news
our news

Report finds major banks ramped up fossil fuel financing to $115 billion in 2017

Despite 2017 being the costliest year on record for weather disasters, new report reveals that banks increased extreme fossil fuel financing last year, led by a more than doubling in lending to tar sands companies and pipelines.
2018-03-28 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack, Honor the Earth, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club
blog
external news
our news

Investing in a Green Belt and Road? Assessing the Implementation of China’s Green Credit Guidelines Abroad

The Chinese government has become an unexpected leader in pushing for new green credit policies, but are Chinese banks doing their part to keep the belt and road initiative green?
2017-12-13 | Friends of the Earth US
blog
external news
our news

Chinese banks rule out Carmichael coal mine!

2017-12-05 | Market Forces
blog
external news
our news

Adani Group: China Construction Bank won't grant loan, PR firm says

2017-12-02 | The Guardian
blog
external news
our news

Indigenous Groups Lead Movement to Call on Banks to Drop Enbridge’s Controversial Line 3 Pipeline

Tribal Nations based in Minnesota oppose the project and the Minnesota Department of Commerce has condemned it
2017-09-21 | Minneapolis, MN | Honor the Earth, Rainforest Action Network
blog
external news
our news

Financiers of pulp and paper industry projects will cause environmental and social harm, says new report

2017-08-01 | Mandy Haggith – Environmental Paper Network
blog
external news
our news

Foreign investors eye RI banks

2015-04-02 | The Jakarta Post
blog
external news
our news

Call for banks to divest from APRIL

Social conflict and environmental destruction are rife in its operations
2014-12-10 | Nijmegen | BankTrack, Mandy Haggith – Environmental Paper Network
blog
external news
our news

Banks not yet living up to UN human rights principles, finds BankTrack

New research finds inadequate reporting on human rights impacts, and failure to establish mechanisms to allow complaints.
2014-12-02 | Geneva | BANKTRACK
blog
external news
our news

'Record year' for bank coal financing as latest UN climate warning looms

2014-10-29 | Nijmegen | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

Chinese banks ignore pleas of Ecuador mining campaigners

The failure to respond to an NGO letter challenging investment in the Mirador mining project has played to Ecuadorian fears about China's growing clout
2014-05-14 | Beijing | China Dialogue
blog
external news
our news

Australian coal projects could be ineligible to receive Chinese finance

2013-07-24 | Melbourne | Market Forces
blog
external news
our news

Bankrolling Climate Change

NGOs present groundbreaking research on banks’ involvement in coal financing
2011-11-30 | Durban | urgewald, Earthlife, BankTrack and groundWork
blog
external news
our news

China digs in conflict-ridden Burma for oil and gas

2011-09-06 | Bangkok | Finance GreenWatch
blog
external news
our news

Chinese NGOs Rank the Country’s Major Financiers, Launch Sustainability Benchmarking of Chinese Commercials Banks

2011-07-11 | Kunming, China | Green Watershed
blog
external news
our news

Time to volunteer

2010-08-03 | China Dialogue
blog
external news
our news

BankTrack calls upon banks to Close the Gap on investment policies

New report evaluates quality of investment policies of 49 banks; more policies in place, overall quality below what is required
2010-04-27 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

Chinese NGOs announce the second Green Banking Innovation Award

2009-08-01 | Beijing | Green Watershed, Global Environmental Institute and other Chinese NGOs
blog
external news
our news

民间环保团体评出第二届绿色银行创新奖

2009-08-01 | 中国 北京 | Friends of the Earth US
blog
external news
our news

China adopts sustainable lending laws

Shows potential way forward for global financial regulators
2008-11-20 | US and Netherlands | Friends of the Earth US
blog
external news
our news

中国采纳可持续借贷法规

为全球金融监管者指引潜在前进方向
2008-11-20 | US and Netherlands | Friends of the Earth US
blog
external news
our news

New Financiers and the Environment

New Report Shows Ten Perspectives on How Financial Institutions Can Protect the Environment
2008-05-15 | Berkeley | International Rivers
blog
external news
our news

Chinese banks need to catch up on environmental policies

International banks must take responsibility in advocating for better standards
2007-05-09 | San Fransisco, Utrecht | Friends of the Earth US

Documents

Type:
Year:
ngo documents
2020-10-28 00:00:00

Who is who in the Chinese lending institutional landscape

2020-10-28 00:00:00 | Urgewald
annual reports
2020-07-14 00:00:00

CSR Report 2018

2020-07-14 00:00:00
annual reports
2020-05-19 00:00:00

Annual report 2019

2020-05-19 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
our publications
2020-03-18 00:00:00

Banking on Climate Change - Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2020

2020-03-18 00:00:00 | Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
correspondence
2019-12-10 00:00:00

Letter from BankTrack to China Construction Bank on the bank's progress on its fossil fuel finance since COP24

2019-12-10 00:00:00 | BankTrack
annual reports
2019-06-24 00:00:00

Annual report 2018

2019-06-24 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2019-06-24 00:00:00

CSR report 2018

2019-06-24 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
csr policies
2019-06-11 00:00:00

Modern Slavery Statement

2019-06-11 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
correspondence
2018-10-16 00:00:00

Letter from BankTrack and 120 organisations to China Construction Bank on Demands FBNT campaign

2018-10-16 00:00:00 | BankTrack and 120 organisations
csr policies
2018-09-30 00:00:00

Green, Social and Sustainability Bond Framework

2018-09-30 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2018-05-08 00:00:00

Annual report 2017

2018-05-08 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2018-03-31 00:00:00

CSR report 2017

2018-03-31 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
correspondence
2017-11-24 00:00:00

Letter from 30 Indonesian NGOs to PT RAPP financiers on current situation of PT RAPP (APRIL's main supplier)

2017-11-24 00:00:00 | 30 Indonesian NGOs
ngo documents
2017-09-20 00:00:00

Problematic pipelines: Investor risk from bank financing of tar sands pipelines

2017-09-20 00:00:00 | Greenpeace
ngo documents
2017-08-01 00:00:00

In the Red

An Assessment of Bank Policies for Financing Pulp and Paper
2017-08-01 00:00:00 | Environmental Paper Network
annual reports
2017-04-30 00:00:00

CSR report 2016

English from p. 72
2017-04-30 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2017-03-31 00:00:00

Annual report 2016

2017-03-31 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2017-03-31 00:00:00

CSR report 2016

(in Chinese)
2017-03-31 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
ngo documents
2017-03-27 00:00:00

Financiers of IOI and Asia Pulp & Paper (APP) face material ESG risks from failure to respect land tenure rights

2017-03-27 00:00:00 | RAN, TuK & Profundo
csr policies
2017-01-06 00:00:00

Anti Money Laundering Questionnaire

(The Wolfsberg Group)
2017-01-06 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
our publications
2016-09-01 00:00:00

Green Paper, Red lines

Chinese version
2016-09-01 00:00:00 | BankTrack
our publications
2016-06-30 00:00:00

Banking with Principles? Second Edition June 2016

Benchmarking Banks against the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
2016-06-30 00:00:00 | BankTrack
annual reports
2016-06-08 00:00:00

Annual report 2015

2016-06-08 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2016-06-08 00:00:00

Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2014

Chinese only
2016-06-08 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
our publications
2016-06-02 00:00:00

Green Paper, Red Lines

Requirements for pulp and paper industry finance
2016-06-02 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Environmental Paper Network
annual reports
2016-03-31 00:00:00

CSR report 2015

(in Chinese)
2016-03-31 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2015-06-15 00:00:00

Annual Report 2014

2015-06-15 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
our publications
2015-05-04 00:00:00

The end of coal?

2015 Coal Finance Report Card
2015-05-04 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Rainforest Action Network and Sierra Club
correspondence
2014-12-10 00:00:00

Letter from EPN to Banks investing in April on APRIL

2014-12-10 00:00:00 | EPN
our publications
2014-12-02 00:00:00

Banking with Principles?

Benchmarking Banks against the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
2014-12-02 00:00:00 | BankTrack
our publications
2014-11-25 00:00:00

Going out, but going green?

Assessing the implementation of China's Green Credit Guidelines
2014-11-25 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Friends of the Earth US
our publications
2014-10-29 00:00:00

Banking on Coal 2014

2014-10-29 00:00:00 | BankTrack
annual reports
2014-04-28 00:00:00

2013 Annual Report

2014-04-28 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
ngo documents
2013-11-25 00:00:00

Green Credit Footprint of Chinese banks (2008-2012)

-Chinese version-
2013-11-25 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
annual reports
2013-04-21 00:00:00

2012 Annual Report

2013-04-21 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
annual reports
2013-03-24 00:00:00

Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2012 (Chinese)

2013-03-24 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
ngo documents
2012-11-26 00:00:00

Environmental report on Chinese banks 2011

-English summary-
2012-11-26 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
correspondence
2012-11-06 00:00:00

Letter from BankTrack et al. to various financial institutions on APP

2012-11-06 00:00:00 | BankTrack et al.
our publications
2012-04-18 00:00:00

Environmental Report on Chinese Banks (2011)

-Chinese version-
2012-04-18 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
our publications
2012-03-28 00:00:00

Executive Summary of Environmental Report on Chinese Banks (2011)

2012-03-28 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
bank documents
2012-02-24 00:00:00

Notice of the CBRC on Issuing the Green Credit Guidelines

2012-02-24 00:00:00 | China Banking Regulatory Commission
correspondence
2011-08-29 00:00:00

民间环保组织就陆良化工铬污染事件致16家中资上市银行的公开信(Chinese)

2011-08-29 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
correspondence
2011-08-29 00:00:00

An Open Letter from a Coalition of Environmental NGOs to 16 Chinese banks Regarding the Chromium Pollution Incident in Luliang(English)

2011-08-29 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
ngo documents
2011-07-06 00:00:00

Environmental Record of Chinese Banks 2010

2011-07-06 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
ngo documents
2011-06-24 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #12 -English-

2011-06-24 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
other documents
2011-05-25 00:00:00

China Construction Bank Cluster Munitions Investments

2011-05-25 00:00:00 | Netwerk Vlaanderen & IKV Pax Christi
ngo documents
2011-04-12 00:00:00

中 国银行业环境记录2010

2011-04-12 00:00:00 | 于晓刚,绿色流城
ngo documents
2011-03-08 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #11 -English-

2011-03-08 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
ngo documents
2010-11-29 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #10 -English-

2010-11-29 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
ngo documents
2010-09-01 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance newsletter #9 -English-

2010-09-01 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
other documents
2010-07-26 00:00:00

Credit where its due (2)

2010-07-26 00:00:00 | Adina Matisoff, Foe US
other documents
2010-07-26 00:00:00

Credit where its due (1)

2010-07-26 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
ngo documents
2010-04-29 00:00:00

Chinese Banks Report -Chinese-

2010-04-29 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
our publications
2010-04-27 00:00:00

Close the Gap

Benchmarking investment policies of international banks
2010-04-27 00:00:00 | BankTrack
other documents
2010-03-26 00:00:00

中资银行:谁比谁更绿 民间报告首度披露14 家中资上市银行绿色信贷现状

2010-03-26 00:00:00 | Southern weekend
ngo documents
2010-03-24 00:00:00

Chinese Banking Industry Environmental Record (NGO analysis) - Executive Summary

2010-03-24 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
ngo documents
2009-11-17 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #6

2009-11-17 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
our publications
2009-08-17 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #5 -English-

2009-08-17 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
ngo documents
2009-05-15 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #4 -English-

2009-05-15 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
ngo documents
2009-03-25 00:00:00

Green Investment III

2009-03-25 00:00:00 | Greenpeace China
ngo documents
2009-03-12 00:00:00

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #3 -English-

2009-03-12 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
ngo documents
2008-11-20 00:00:00

The Green Evolution: Environmental Policies and Practice in the Chinese Banking Sector

2008-11-20 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth-US
ngo documents
2008-11-20 00:00:00

中国采纳可持续借贷法规, 为全球金融监管者指引潜在前进方向

2008-11-20 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth-US
ngo documents
2008-11-20 00:00:00

绿色变革: 中国银行业的环境政策与实践

2008-11-20 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth-US
ngo documents
2008-05-14 00:00:00

新的供资方与环境 - New Financiers and the Environment

2008-05-14 00:00:00 | International Rivers
ngo documents
2008-05-14 00:00:00

New Financiers and the Environment

2008-05-14 00:00:00 | International Rivers
our publications
2007-05-09 00:00:00

Time to go Green; environmental responsibility in the Chinese banking sector

2007-05-09 00:00:00 | FoE US, BankTrack
our publications
2007-05-07 00:00:00

Time to Go Green (Chinese)

2007-05-07 00:00:00 | FoE US, BankTrack

Links

EPN assessment of policies against 14 minimum criteria - China Construction Bank

Environmental Paper Network (EPN) evaluated the policies of 68 major financiers of the pulp and paper industry against 14 absolute minimum criteria that all financial institutions should require their clients, investments and business partners to respect in order to reduce social and environmental risks.

https://environmentalpaper.org/china-construction-bank/

Policies

Voluntary initiatives

China Construction Bank has committed itself to the following voluntary standards:
  • Banking Environment Initiative
  • Global Reporting Initiative

Investment policies

China Construction Bank has no publicly available investment policies nor has it a webpage on corporate social responsibility.

2018 China Construction Bank stated to “become a bank that serves the general public, promotes people’s livelihood, facilitates low carbon and environmental protection, and achieves sustainable development. With focus on global climate change, CCB adheres to the strategic approaches to use financial power to promote environmental protection and harmonized development of society."

2017 In CCB's 2017 annual report it stated that "the Bank includes “Green Banking” as a goal in its medium-and long-term business planning. It has vigorously improved the green credit policies and system, developed green credit businesses, strengthened environmental and social risk management, and enriched green credit products and services."

2016 CCB states in its 2016 CSR report that "it takes its environmental responsibilities seriously and provides strong support for low-carbon economy."

2014 The bank declared in its CSR report improvements listed below: "CCB gives priority to developing financial services for small enterprises and providing better financial services to address the public needs for the 'Three Rural' and facilitate the development of the western region."

"CCB undertakes its environmental responsibility conscientiously and strongly supports the low carbon economy and environmental protection industry. The bank is also attentive to social needs and actively participates in charity work to ensure it gives back to society. It is concerned with community development and contributes to the improvement of the harmonious development of society."

The important topics for CCB were identified in its CSR report 2014, including:

  • support green credit policy
  • enhance customer satisfaction
  • staff incentive programs
  • inclusive financial services
  • operation continuity
Year:
csr policies
2019-06-11 00:00:00

Modern Slavery Statement

2019-06-11 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
csr policies
2018-09-30 00:00:00

Green, Social and Sustainability Bond Framework

2018-09-30 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank
csr policies
2017-01-06 00:00:00

Anti Money Laundering Questionnaire

(The Wolfsberg Group)
2017-01-06 00:00:00 | China Construction Bank

Good moves

Year:
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted