BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › BankTrack news ›
BankTrack News

Banks failing to address severe human rights impacts transparently, finds BankTrack research

Findings reinforce the need for regulators to ensure access to effective remedy for people affected by bank finance
2021-12-14 | Nijmegen
By: BankTrack
Contact:

Hannah Greep: hannah@banktrack.org

"Action speak louder" report cover. Photo: BankTrack
2021-12-14 | Nijmegen
By: BankTrack
Contact:

Hannah Greep: hannah@banktrack.org

New analysis by BankTrack finds that bank responses to allegations of human rights abuses linked to their finance typically avoid addressing the specific issue raised, and only very rarely set out any specific action taken towards resolving the problem.

The findings stem from an analysis of 90 instances in which banks were contacted regarding adverse human rights impacts and also found no cases in which banks monitored the result of any action they had taken to address the human rights impacts. The findings underline the need for emerging regulation on mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence to prioritise access to effective remedy for people affected by corporate abuse.  

The report, “Actions speak louder: Assessing bank responses to human rights violations'', investigates bank responses in nine cases in which severe human rights impacts are felt by local communities and affected people, ranging from forced displacement and failure to provide compensation to ties with oppressive regimes and paramilitary violence. It scores banks on whether they address the allegations raised; set out appropriate action taken; and monitor whether these steps are effective. The report covers cases as varied as the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) in Uganda and Tanzania, the Base Toliara mineral sands mine in Madagascar, and Israeli illlegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). 

The UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) set out a responsibility for all businesses, including financial institutions, to avoid infringing on the human rights of others and address adverse human rights impacts with which they are involved when they occur. Ten years on from the publication of the UNGPs, examples of banks providing or contributing to adequate remedy for affected people remain extremely rare. 

From an analysis of 90 instances in which BankTrack or other civil society groups contacted banks regarding specific allegations of human rights abuse, the report finds that banks responded in most instances (69 responses, or 77%), but that in over half of these responses (36 out of 69, or 52%), the response neither addresses the substance of the issue raised nor acknowledges the bank’s finance for the company or project in question. The analysis found only six cases in which banks set out any specific action taken to address their link to the impact or resolve it.  No instances were found in which banks provided details on whether or how they monitored the effectiveness of any action to prevent, mitigate or address impacts. 

10543
infographic_p_7_1.png
center
.
Photo: BankTrack

The cases included in the report all represent severe human rights impacts felt by local communities and affected people. For example, the proposed EACOP oil pipeline has already impacted local people before construction has begun, with delays to compensation, restrictions on land use and harassment and intimidation of affected people. Of 21 banks approached, only 13 responded to a letter on the issue, and five of those responses simply cited client confidentiality, and did not address the issues raised or acknowledged the bank’s link to the project. 

“Local communities that are affected by these projects deserve a well-considered and concrete response from the banks that are providing finance” said Hannah Greep, human rights campaigner at BankTrack. “It is not enough for banks to refer to abstract human rights policies if they don’t then show how this is implemented on the ground through addressing human rights impacts and providing appropriate remedies.”

Another impact included in the report are labour standards violations in IOI Corporation’s Malaysian plantations, as exposed by a 2014 report by Finnwatch. Their investigation found severe violations of labour standards, including withholding workers’ passports, denying their rights to join trade unions, and failure to pay the minimum wage. Of 15 banks approached, 14 responded to BankTrack, however only three banks took some action by engaging with its client or excluding the company from finance, but none of the banks did enough to receive a full score on any of the criteria. 

The results show clear differences by country, with French banks setting a relatively good example, responding in 11 instances out of the 14 enquiries made and receiving an average response score of 0.75 out of 3. Banks in the US and UK also responded often - 14 responses out of 17 in the UK and 14 responses out of 15 in the US), but these responses scored much lower for their quality, only receiving 0.29 out of 3 in both countries. Japanese banks also responded frequently - 8 instances out of 10 - but only one of these responses received a score above 0. 

10544
country_score_table_p_7_png.jpg
center
.
Photo: BankTrack

BankTrack is calling for progress towards mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence from regulators, with an emphasis on ensuring grievance mechanisms and other channels are available through which people whose rights are affected by bank-financed projects can seek effective remedy. In the meantime, banks must respond to communities and civil society organisations that raise genuine human rights concerns, and do so in a way that constructively engages with the issues raised and includes taking appropriate action, wherever possible, towards making sure human rights abuses are avoided where possible, and otherwise remediated. 

This report marks the start of BankTrack’s project to systematically evaluate banks on their responses to human rights allegations, as part of BankTrack’s Human Rights Benchmark project. It aims to build on the benchmarking of banks on human rights, with a greater emphasis on actual impacts on people and communities, and how banks respond, or fail to respond, to address such impacts. 

Banks

ABN AMRO

Netherlands
Active

Agricultural Bank of China

China
Active

ANZ

Australia
Active

Banco Santander

Spain
Active

Bank of America

United States
Active

Bank of China

China
Active

Barclays

United Kingdom
Active

BBVA

Spain
Active

BNP Paribas

France
Active

BPCE

France
Active

China Construction Bank

China
Active

Citi

United States
Active

Commonwealth Bank

Australia
Active

Crédit Agricole

France
Active

Credit Suisse

Switzerland
Active

Deutsche Bank

Germany
Active

Goldman Sachs

United States
Active

HSBC

United Kingdom
Active

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC)

China
Active

ING

Netherlands
Active

Intesa Sanpaolo

Italy
Active

JPMorgan Chase

United States
Active

Lloyds Banking Group

United Kingdom
Active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG)

Japan
Active

Mizuho Financial Group

Japan
Active

Morgan Stanley

United States
Active

National Australia Bank (NAB)

Australia
Active

NatWest Group

United Kingdom
Active

Rabobank

Netherlands
Active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)

Canada
Active

Scotiabank

Canada
Active

Société Générale

France
Active

Standard Bank

South Africa
Active

Standard Chartered

United Kingdom
Active

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group

Japan
Active

UBS

Switzerland
Active

UniCredit

Italy
Active

Wells Fargo

United States
Active
Dodgy Deals

Base Toliara sands mine

Madagascar
Project
Active
Mining

Base Toliara sands mine

Madagascar

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda
Project
Target
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda

Nachtigal hydropower plant

Cameroon
Project
Active
Hydroelectric Power Generation

Nachtigal hydropower plant

Cameroon
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Trafigura

Singapore
Company
active
Commodities Trading | Oil and Gas Extraction

Trafigura

Singapore
There are no active company profiles for this item now.

Drummond

United States
Company
on record
Coal Mining

Drummond

United States

IOI Corporation

Malaysia
Company
on record
Agriculture for Palm Oil

IOI Corporation

Malaysia

Vitol

Switzerland
Company
on record
Commodities Trading | Oil and Gas Extraction

Vitol

Switzerland
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted