ActiveThis profile is actively maintained
Send feedback on this profile
Download as PDF
Created on: 2018-05-22 15:55:37
Last update: 2018-10-10 11:23:45 BIRUDO & Inclusive Development International
Paolyel Onencan, BIRUDO - email@example.com
Natalie Bugalski, Inclusive Development International– Natalie@inclusivedevelopment.net
Share this page:
Why this profile?
This planned 1,445-kilometer pipeline and associated oil extraction is expected to cause large-scale displacement of communities and pose grave risks to protected environments throughout Uganda and Tanzania, as well as to water sources and the biophysical and socio-economic values of wetlands in both countries.
About East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)
Approximately 1.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil have been discovered in the Albertine Graben, the basin of Lake Albert, on the border between Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Extraction will take place at two oil fields, operated by China National Offshore Oil Corporation Ltd (CNOOC Ltd) and Total S.A. Once extracted, the oil will be partly refined in Uganda to supply the local market and partly exported to the international market via the East African Crude Oil Export Pipeline (EACOP). The 1,445-kilometer pipeline will transport crude oil south from Uganda for export at the Port of Tanga in Tanzania. If completed, it will be the longest electrically heated pipeline in the world.
The project (including both the extraction and pipeline components) is a joint venture between CNOOC, Total, and Tullow Oil. Each currently owns 33.3% of the project; however, Tullow plans to sell the majority of its interest to CNOOC, Total, and the Ugandan Government. This transaction, which is expected to occur mid-2018, will reduce Tullow to a passive 10% shareholder in the project. The pipeline is expected to cost USD 3.5 billion, the majority of which will come from project finance loans.
Both the extraction sites and the EACOP pose serious environmental and social risks to protected wildlife areas, water sources and communities throughout Uganda and Tanzania. As such, the project is facing significant local community and civil society resistance.
Oil was discovered in Uganda’s Albertine Graben in 2006 by exploration company Tullow Oil. Production licenses for the oil fields were issued by the Government of Uganda in August 2016 but commercial production has not yet begun, as it is contingent on the completion of the export pipeline. Extraction at the oil fields and the pipeline are therefore associated facilities, which should be regarded as interconnected components of one project.
EACOP is currently under development by the three oil companies; Tullow, Total, and CNOOC; in partnership with the Ugandan and Tanzanian state-owned oil companies. The Inter-governmental Agreement between Uganda and Tanzania was signed in May 2017, securing the pipeline route. The Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) for the pipeline was conducted in early 2018 by US firm Gulf Interstate Engineers, and an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) is underway by UK firm RSK Environment Ltd. The pipeline’s projected completion date is 2020, allowing full-scale oil extraction to commence shortly thereafter in 2021. Debt financing for the pipeline (amounting to approximately USD 3 billion) is currently being arranged by Stanbic Bank Uganda and Sumitomo Mitsui.
What must happen
Civil society organizations are calling for full information disclosure, in an accessible form, about all of the project components, and the possible human rights, social and environmental risks and impacts. They are calling for a process of free and informed consent of directly affected communities and meaningful consultation with civil society more broadly given the scale of the project and its potential implications for Uganda and the region.
At a minimum, all project sponsors and financiers must ensure that the project complies with Ugandan law, human rights standards and other international standards, and the IFC Performance Standards, which require meaningful consultation prior to project decisions being made, including the principle of Free, Prior, Informed Consent (FPIC).
Banks considering providing finance should first require, inter alia, 1) a thorough and independent social and environmental impact assessment 2) a detailed land acquisition and resettlement plan, and 3) an oil spill contingency plan. They should ensure that all of these documents have been developed on the basis of consent of directly affected communities and meaningful consultation of interested civil society organizations.
Financiers should be aware that civil society organizations cannot take a position on supporting or opposing the project until they have received all of this information, but oppose the project moving forward until such information is publicly disclosed and there is an open, accessible and meaningful consultation and consent process.
Large scale land acquisition and resettlement in relation to oil extraction, pipeline construction and associated infrastructure is necessary on both a temporary and permanent basis, as the pipeline route traverses a number of heavily populated districts in both Uganda and Tanzania.
Oil extraction is expected to have a profound impact on livelihoods, including those reliant on agriculture, livestock rearing, and fishing communities at Lake Albert, where oil extraction will occur. The pipeline also poses a threat to the fresh water basin of Lake Victoria and to the wetlands of Tanzania, through which the pipeline is expected to run, which directly supports the livelihoods of more than 30 million people in the region.
The project also threatens the region’s thriving tourism sector, which is a source of livelihood and pride to many in East Africa. This includes the Murchison Falls National Park, Uganda’s largest park and a popular tourist destination, where 40% of Lake Albert’s oil is located. Tanzania, where 1,149 kilometres of the pipeline will be built and operated, is a country heavily dependent on tourism and on its wetland ecosystem for transport, fishing, agro-pastoral activities, hydrological processes and irrigation. For this reason the possibility of a pipeline leak leading to degradation of these key ecosystems, protected areas and wildlife habitats is not only an environmental threat, but a severe socio-economic one as well. Employment benefits brought by the pipeline project (expected to provide a total of 5,000 jobs of which only 300 will be permanent) is far overshadowed by the potential loss of jobs in the tourism sector and the social, environmental and socio-economic costs of disruption of those ecosystems resulting from the project.
Extraction at the oil fields in Albertine Graben will most directly impact the Murchison Falls National Park, posing a serious threat to biodiversity and rare and endangered species. Moreover, important tributaries of the Nile flow nearby, and oil spills and other pollution affecting the river could have profound impacts as distant as North Africa. Pollution of these rivers can put severe pressures on all users - from individuals, to businesses and governments - leading to an increase in cross-border conflicts.
According to a preliminary environmental and socio-economic threat analysis conducted by WWF, the pipeline also poses far reaching and extensive environmental threats to the East African region, including:
- Nearly 2,000 square kilometres of protected wildlife habitats, including the Biharamulo Game Reserve and Wembere Steppe Key Biodiversity Area, will be negatively impacted by the EACOP project
- Approximately 500 square kilometres of important wildlife corridors for the Eastern Chimpanzee and the African Elephant species are likely to be severely degraded
- Freshwater pollution and degradation are at high risk, as over 400 kilometres of the pipeline will traverse the Lake Victoria basin
- Two important Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs), the Pemba-Shimoni-Kisite site and the Tanga Coelacanth site, are at high risk given the huge amount of oil to be transferred offshore at the Tanga Port. These EBSAS host several Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) as well as Mangrove Forest Reserves.
The probability of a pipeline oil spill is high, given that about a third of the pipeline is located in the Lake Victoria watershed, an active seismic area.
Both components of the project will directly impact several Ramsar Wetlands of International Importance. (The Ramsar Convention is an international treaty for the conservation and sustainable use of wetlands.) Oil extraction will take place within the Murchison Falls-Albert Delta Wetland System, a Ramsar site that plays an important role for wildlife in the National Park and is a spawning ground for indigenous fish species. The pipeline will also run near or through a number of Ramsar sites that lie just west of Lake Victoria, including Mabamba Bay, the Lake Mburo-Nakivali System, the Lake Nabugabo System, the Nabajjuzi System, and the Sango Bay-Musambwa Island. (Several potential financiers, listed below, have policies restricting them from financing operations that adversely impact Ramsar sites.)
Land acquisition within the oil extraction zone and along the pipeline corridor will likely force resettlement of entire communities. These changes, if not managed well and with extensive community consultation and consent, could lead to increased land conflict and the erosion of cultural heritage, especially in indigenous communities. New infrastructure such as roads and settlements will likely disrupt existing community livelihoods by fuelling conflict or restricting access to natural resources along the pipeline route.
Additionally, issues of resettlement and compensation are very sensitive in countries such as Uganda and Tanzania, where land titles and rights are complex. Rights often go unrecognized and undervalued when extractive industries enter customary owned territories. Without extensive community consultation and consent over projects that concern their lives and resources, violations regarding land ownership, resettlement and compensation are likely.
Oil extraction often causes disproportionate impacts on women, who often carry the burden of relocation and change in society while not benefiting from new employment opportunities. It has also been reported that where extractive industries operate there is often a rise in levels of prostitution and gender-based violence. According to ActionAid’s report on the human rights impact of Uganda’s oil sector, the sex trade in Hoima, where extraction at Lake Albert will occur, has significantly increased over the last several years due to the discovery of oil.
Applicable norms and standards
The East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) is expected to cost approximately USD 3.5 billion, 15% of which will be provided by the equity investors in the project. The remaining $3 billion will be provided via project finance loans, which are currently being arranged by two Equator Principles Financial Institutions: Sumitomo Mitsui of Japan and Stanbic Bank Uganda (local subsidiary of South Africa’s Standard Bank, and Chair of the Equator Principles Association Steering Committee). As project finance arrangers, Stanbic Uganda and Sumitomo Mitsui are tasked with finding other banks to join the loan, a process that is happening now.
Recent financiers of CNOOC and Total include:
- Agricultural Bank of China
- Bank of America
- Bank of China
- BNP Paribas
- China Construction Bank
- China Development Bank
- China International Capital Company
- Credit Agricole
- Credit Suisse
- Deutsche Bank
- Goldman Sachs
- Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
- JP Morgan
- Morgan Stanley
- OCBC Bank
- Royal Bank of Canada
- Societe Generale
- Standard Chartered
- United Overseas Bank