BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › BankTrack news ›
BankTrack News

NGOs reveal the companies and financiers behind fossil fuel expansion in Africa

2022-11-15 | Berlin / Sharm El-Sheikh
By: BankTrack, urgewald, 350.org Africa, Africa Coal Network & Oilwatch Africa
Contact:

Heffa Schuecking
Director
Urgewald
+49-160-96761436 (WhatsApp / Signal) 
At COP27

Omar Elmawi
Coordinator, #StopEACOP Campaign
Exec Director, Muslims for Human Rights
+254-780343432 (WhatsApp / Signal)
At COP27

Dr. Ognyan Seizov
International Communications Director
Urgewald +49-17623112082 (WhatsApp / Signal)
At COP27

Protest in Nairobi against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP). Photo: 350 Africa
2022-11-15 | Berlin / Sharm El-Sheikh
By: BankTrack, urgewald, 350.org Africa, Africa Coal Network & Oilwatch Africa
Contact:

Heffa Schuecking
Director
Urgewald
+49-160-96761436 (WhatsApp / Signal) 
At COP27

Omar Elmawi
Coordinator, #StopEACOP Campaign
Exec Director, Muslims for Human Rights
+254-780343432 (WhatsApp / Signal)
At COP27

Dr. Ognyan Seizov
International Communications Director
Urgewald +49-17623112082 (WhatsApp / Signal)
At COP27

  • Oil, gas and coal companies are exploring or developing new fossil fuel reserves in 48 African countries.
  • 89% of new LNG capacity in Africa is planned for export.
  • International investors hold over US$ 109 billion in companies driving fossil fuel expansion in Africa.

At the UN Climate Summit today, Urgewald, Stop EACOP, Oilwatch Africa, Africa Coal Network, 33 further African NGOs and BankTrack released the Report “Who is Financing Fossil Fuel Expansion in Africa?” The report identifies 200 companies that are exploring or developing new fossil fuel reserves or developing new fossil infrastructure such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, pipelines or gas and coal-fired power plants in Africa. “Fossil fuels are at the root of the climate crisis and Africa is harder hit by this crisis than any other continent. Yet 200 coal, oil and gas companies are flooding the continent with dirty energy projects that are completely incompatible with the Paris climate goals and the 1.5°C limit,” says Omar Elmawi, coordinator of the Stop EACOP Campaign and Executive Director of Muslims for Human Rights. According to the NGOs’ report, these companies are pursuing fossil expansion projects in 48 out of 55 African countries.

Oil and gas expansion begins with exploration

While delegates are negotiating at the UN Climate Summit in Sharm El-Sheikh, 55 companies are busy prospecting for new oil and gas fields in Egypt alone. Since 2017, 886,000 km2 – an area larger than France and Italy combined – have been licensed for new oil and gas exploration in Africa. (1) Out of the 45 African countries, where the oil and gas industry is currently prospecting for new finds, 18 are what the industry calls “frontier countries”, i.e. countries like Namibia, Uganda or Somalia that have little or no existing oil or gas production. The report’s analysis of Rystad Energy data shows that total capital expenditures for oil and gas exploration in Africa rose from US$ 3.4 billion in 2020 to US$ 5.1 billion in 2022. African companies accounted for less than one third of this sum. The bulk of exploration for new oil and gas resources in Africa is carried out and financed by foreign companies. “Every dollar spent on new oil and gas exploration goes against the 1.5°C roadmap laid out by the International Energy Agency in 2021. Financial institutions need to drop clients that are still searching for new oil and gas resources we can’t afford to burn,” says Heffa Schuecking, director of Urgewald.

Who are the largest developers of new oil and gas fields in Africa?

The report uses data from Urgewald’s Global Oil and Gas Exit List (GOGEL) to assess which companies are planning to bring the largest amount of new oil and gas resources into production before 2030. (2)The largest developer of new upstream oil and gas resources in Africa is TotalEnergies. The French oil major already sources 25% of its hydrocarbon production from Africa and aims to add 2.27 billion barrels of oil equivalent to its African portfolio. The extraction and combustion of these new resources would equal three years of France’s annual greenhouse gas emissions. The second and third largest upstream developers in Africa are the state-owned Algerian oil and gas company Sonatrach (1.75 billion barrels of oil equivalent) and the Italian oil major Eni (1.32 billion barrels of oil equivalent). All in all, oil and gas companies are preparing to add at least 15.8 billion barrels of oil equivalent to their production portfolios in Africa before 2030. The extraction and combustion of these oil and gas resources would release 8 Gigatons of CO2eq into the atmosphere – more than twice the amount the EU emits each year.

Flooding Africa with new fossil infrastructure

Fossil fuel infrastructure such as pipelines and LNG terminals are expensive to build, and their intended operational lifetime spans decades. TotalEnergies’ and CNOOC’s East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) will cost over US$ 5 billion and is expected to operate for at least 20 years. ExxonMobil’s and Eni’s Rovuma LNG project in Mozambique and Equinor’s Tanzania LNG project are each estimated to cost US$ 30 billion and would operate for more than 30 years. These projects will lock in fossil emissions over decades and lock out host countries’ opportunity to build a renewable future. According to the International Energy Agency, “achieving full access to modern energy in Africa by 2030 would require investments of US$ 25 billion per year,” a sum that is comparable to the cost of just one large LNG project. (3)

In Africa, oil and gas companies are developing new LNG terminals with a combined capacity of over 87 million tons per annum. These projects will increase Africa’s existing LNG terminal capacity by 116%. And over 89% of the new LNG infrastructure is being built for export, mainly to Europe and Asia. “Europe’s fossil fuel addiction is a major driver behind new LNG projects in Africa. The rush for Africa’s oil and gas has nothing to do with increasing energy access for Africans,” says Anabela Lemos, director of Justiça Ambiental (Friends of the Earth Mozambique).

Coal still not being phased down or out

Although Africa’s coal plant pipeline has shrunk over the past four years, the coal industry is still expanding on the continent. (4) New coal power plants, coal mines or coal transport infrastructure are planned or under development in 11 African countries. In total, 10,135 MW of new coal-fired capacity are still in the pipeline. Over half of the new coal power capacity is planned in Zimbabwe and will largely power mining operations instead of providing power to the 47% of the population, which still has no access to electricity. Currently, 70 new coal mines or mine extensions are being developed in 9 African countries. The countries with the largest number of coal mining projects are South Africa (49 projects), Zimbabwe (6 projects), Botswana (5 projects), and Mozambique (4 projects).

Who is financing fossil fuel expansion in Africa?

“Africa has 39% of the world’s total renewable potential, yet foreign investors continue to bankroll a fossil future for our continent,” says Bobby Peek from the Life After Coal Campaign in South Africa. In July 2022, over 5,000 institutional investors held shares and bonds totaling US$ 109 billion in companies developing new fossil fuel projects in Africa. (5) The top 23 investors account for 50% of this sum. Out of these top investors, 14 are headquartered in the US, 6 in Europe, 1 in Canada, 1 in India and 1 in South Africa. The largest institutional investor in fossil fuel expansion in Africa is the USbased investment giant BlackRock with holdings of over US$ 12 billion. Next in line are Vanguard (US$ 8.4 billion) and the Norwegian Government Pension Fund (US$ 3.7 billion).

Commercial banks channeled over US$ 98 billion to companies developing new fossil projects in Africa between January 2019 and July 2022. Out of this total, US$ 44 billion were provided through loans and US$ 54 billion through underwriting of new share and bond issuances. The number one banker of fossil fuel developers in Africa is Citigroup (US$ 5.6 billion), followed by JPMorgan Chase (US$ 5.1 billion) and BNP Paribas (US$ 4.6 billion).

According to the NGOs’ report, 71% of bank support for fossil fuel developers in Africa came from banks that are members of the “Net Zero Banking Alliance.” “Making net-zero promises for tomorrow is meaningless if you are spending billions of dollars on fossil fuel expansion today. Financial institutions that claim to be lining up for 1.5°C need to stop supporting clients who are driving us towards 2.8°C,” says Heffa Schuecking.

As Omar Elmawi says on behalf of the 36 African co-publishers of the report, “It is time for financial institutions to step back from companies that are blowing up the world’s carbon budget and locking Africa into the dirty energy sources of the past. Civil society organizations all across Africa are calling for a green renewable energy future that provides energy access to all.”

The full report can be downloaded here.

In March 2022, the Locked out of a Just Transition report published by BankTrack, Milieudefensie, Oil Change International and 19 African partners found that between 2016 and June 2021, public and private financial institutions poured at least US$ 132 billion in lending and underwriting into oil, gas and coal projects in West, East, Central and Southern Africa.

Notes:

(1) Regional Trends Report Africa, Rystad Energy, June 2022
(2) All of the figures in this section are based on GOGEL’s short-term upstream oil and gas expansion metric which covers assets that are already in the field evaluation or development stage and will enter production within the next 1-7 years. More information at https://gogel.org
(3) https://www.iea.org/reports/africa-energy-outlook-2022/key-findings
(4) Based on data from Urgewald’s Global Coal Exit List (GCEL): https://coalexit.org
(5) For multinational companies, we used adjustors to calculate which portion of a corporate loan or investment supports its fossil activities in Africa. A full explanation of our methodology can be found in the report. The financial research was conducted by Profundo.

Banks

BNP Paribas

France
Active

Citi

United States
Active

JPMorgan Chase

United States
Active
Dodgy Deals

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda
Project
Target
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda

Rovuma LNG

Mozambique
Project
Target
Oil and Gas Extraction | ...

Rovuma LNG

Mozambique
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

ENI

Italy
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction

ENI

Italy

Equinor

Norway
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction

Equinor

Norway

ExxonMobil

United States
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction

ExxonMobil

United States

TotalEnergies

France
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction | ...

TotalEnergies

France
There are no active company profiles for this item now.
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted