Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2022-05-19 00:00:00
BNP Paribas and Société Générale: stop financing climate destruction and human rights abuses
2022-05-04 00:00:00
Barclays is big on beef and burning
2022-05-04 00:00:00
Standard Chartered’s 2022 AGM dominated by shareholder alarm over fossil financing
2022-05-02 00:00:00
Banco Santander takes a step on big oil, but what about big meat?
2022-05-20 15:14:47
Seven financiers abandon TotalEnergies' EACOP pipeline in a week
2021-12-16 13:33:02
Cambo oil field "paused" following pressure on Shell & banks
2021-12-16 13:04:42
Equator Principles improve transparency after BankTrack shows the way
2021-11-02 11:03:26
ANZ launches human rights grievance mechanism in a first for the global banking sector
Connect
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
2022-03-08 00:00:00
BankTrack Annual Report 2021
2022-03-03 00:00:00
Locked out of a Just Transition: fossil fuel financing in Africa
2021-12-14 00:00:00
Actions speak louder: Assessing bank responses to human rights violations
2021-10-26 00:00:00
Equator Compliant Climate Destruction: How banks finance fossil fuels under the Equator Principles
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
Equator Banks involved in financing at least 200 fossil fuel projects since Paris
BankTrack research sheds new light on finance for fossil fuels by Equator banks
Start
Banks
Dodgy Deals

By: BankTrack
2021-10-26

Contact:

Hannah Greep, BankTrack


Share this page:

Equator Compliant Climate Destruction report cover. Photo: BankTrack
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

New research into finance for the fossil fuel industry provided under the Equator Principles –  banks’ own rules for financing large infrastructure projects – has found that since the Paris Climate Agreement was signed at the end of 2015, signatory banks have been involved in financing at least 200 fossil fuel projects. This is despite the Equator Principles including a commitment for signatory banks to “support the objectives of the Paris Agreement”. The projects typically not only have a large adverse impact on the world’s climate but also cause substantial damage to communities and the environment.

BankTrack’s new report, “Equator Compliant Climate Destruction: How banks finance fossil fuels under the Equator Principles”, highlights eight climate destructive fossil fuel projects that have been financed ‘under Equator’ since 2016, the first full year after the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement. This is despite the commitment made in the preamble of the Principles “support the objectives” of the Paris agreement. 

These fossil fuel projects include the Vung Ang 2 coal power plant in Vietnam which will not only emit large quantities of air pollutants that affect the health of local communities, but in order to build the plant large swathes of forests need to be cleared and thousands of residents relocated. Japanese banks SMBC, MUFG, Mizuho and Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings all financed this project. Also, the Coastal GasLink pipeline that runs through the lands of the Wet’suwet’en Indigenous nation without their consent and has many environmental risks such as pollution and diesel spills. Equator banks BMO, Caixabank, CIBC, Citi, NAB, RBC and Scotiabank all reported financing the project, but many more Equator banks that failed to report are financing the project. On 19 October, the Gidimt’en Checkpoint from the Wet’suwet’en Nation issued a letter to over 35 investors of the pipeline project demanding them to withdraw all support. In addition, the Mozambique LNG project that will likely emit around 44 million tons of CO2 per year and is located in a region suffering from the consequences of ongoing violent conflict, only made worse by militant attacks and the use of the army and private security companies brought in to protect the project’s facilities. Crédit Agricole and FirstRand both reported financing the project, but many other Equator banks that failed to report are also financing the project.

The report also finds, based on an analysis of data from the Banking on Climate Chaos report, the 37 largest Equator banks together provided US$ 2.9 trillion to fossil fuel projects and companies globally between 2016 and 2020, including US$ 1.2 trillion to the top 100 companies expanding the fossil fuel industry. This includes investments into new exploration projects or infrastructure that further locks us into a fossil-fuelled future. 

The ongoing financing of fossil fuel expansion projects is at odds with the recent urgent warnings from the IPCC, International Energy Agency and UN bodies, that new fossil fuel developments are out of line with the Paris Climate Agreement goal to keep the average global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees. 

The BankTrack led Global Call on Banks from the Fossil Banks No Thanks platform sets out civil society expectations on banks regarding aligning their portfolios with the 1.5 degree goal of the Paris Agreement.

In addition, the report analyses whether the climate-related requirements set out in the Principles are being met in practice for eight case study projects. These include requirements to conduct and publish a Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA) (1); to annually publish greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reports during the operational phase of projects; and to conduct an Alternatives Analysis which evaluates lower GHG intensive alternatives to the project. 

Of the eight projects analysed, none were found to be fully compliant with the climate-related requirements under the Equator Principles. There is no evidence that any of the projects analysed has so far conducted a CCRA; neither of the projects that are in the operational phase have published adequate GHG emissions reports; and none of the projects show evidence that an adequate alternatives analysis was conducted in line with the Principles. In addition, our research found that in two cases, the Environmental and Social Impact Assessments failed to adequately consult local communities. 

Following the report, BankTrack is calling upon the Equator Principles to fulfil their commitment to support the “objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement” by explicitly committing to help limit the global average temperature rise to a maximum of 1.5 degrees. In order to do this, the Equator Principles should no longer allow financing for new fossil fuel projects and infrastructure. In addition, the Equator Principles Association must ensure there is no room under the Equator Principles to provide finance to projects that abuse human rights, including Indigenous rights. 

Hannah Greep, coordinator of BankTrack’s Equator Principles campaign and author of the report, commented: “In the lead up to the Glasgow Climate Summit, COP26, in November 2021, it is more urgent than ever that banks align their portfolios with the 1.5 degree goal of the Paris Agreement. The findings of this report highlight the deep disconnect between the overall objective of the Equator Principles to act as a tool for managing environmental and social risk and the ongoing financing of fossil fuel projects by Equator banks. The Equator Principles Association must act now to ensure that the Principles no longer facilitate climate destruction.” 

Eri Watanabe, 350.org Japan Finance Campaigner: “Among global banks, Japanese banks have supported the largest number of fossil fuel projects under the Equator Principles since the Paris Agreement. Contrary to the principle of 'supporting the objectives of the Paris', the amount of loans to fossil fuel projects by Japanese banks has consistently risen before the global pandemic. There has been a large gap between promises and execution, such as financing the Vung Ang 2 in Vietnam, which fell into an 'exception' of their restricted coal policies. With COP26 on the horizon, the banks must live up to their words and start to phase out fossil fuels and instead direct their finance to sustainable solutions in order to avoid climate catastrophe, respecting the rights of the affected people and future generations."

Cansin Leylim, Associate Director of Global Campaigns at 350.org: "If any further proof was needed, the physical risks of climate change were underlined this year when floods killed people in Germany and the number of wildfires soared in Turkey, Italy and Greece after Europe recorded its second-warmest summer. Banks are responsible for the destruction we are witnessing everywhere, every year. Banks claim to be supportive of the Paris Agreement and the goals to stay below 1.5 degree while still giving trillions of dollars to fossil fuel development. The money they have provided to fossil fuel projects brought destruction to so many, while they could have been put into actions to help the most vulnerable tackle the climate crisis. This is why on October 29th onwards, people are rising up and demanding that banks do their fair share by ending fossil finance and directing it to climate action."

Osprey Orielle Lake, Executive Director of the Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN): “What is needed immediately from the Equator banks and all financial institutions is a show of leadership and dedication to ecological sustainability and respect for human and Indigenous rights, as we face the unprecedented challenges of a world plunging into climate chaos. Divestment from dirty fossil fuel extraction and infrastructure demonstrates a commitment to the 1.5 degree target set forth by the Paris Agreements and to our collective future. As the global community prepares for COP26, the revolving door between financial institutions and fossil fuels must be closed, and Equator banks must respond to calls for justice and accountability, and instead actively invest in renewable and regenerative energy, economic and ecological justice, and healthy communities for all."

Note for editors

(1)The CCRA is a new requirement under EP4, the newest iteration of the Principles which came into effect from 1st October 2020, and therefore only applies to projects that reached financial close after this date. However, Equator banks were encouraged, but not mandated, to apply the new Principles (published in November 2019) to transactions before the implementation date and therefore BankTrack has included it in its assessments for projects that came to a financial close between November 2019 and October 2020. 

This report was updated on November 16th to correct a misrepresentation of the application of EP4. Previously, the report stated that EP4 applied to transactions that reached a financial close after the implementation date of EP4 (October 1st, 2020). However, EP4 is applied to projects which are mandated on or before October 1st, 2020 which happens earlier in the lifecycle of a project than financial close. The text in this report has been updated to reflect this.

Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related banks

ABN AMRO Netherlands

active

Absa Group South Africa

active

Access Bank Nigeria

active

ANZ Australia

active

Banco Sabadell Spain

active

Banco Santander Spain

active

Bancolombia Colombia

active

Bank Muscat Oman

active

Bank of America United States

active

Bank of Montreal (BMO) Canada

active

BBVA Spain

active

BNP Paribas France

active

CaixaBank Spain

active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Canada

active

Citi United States

active

Commonwealth Bank Australia

active

Crédit Agricole France

active

Credit Suisse Switzerland

active

Deutsche Bank Germany

active

DNB Norway

active

DZ Bank Germany

active

E.SUN Bank Taiwan, Republic of China

active

Export Development Canada Canada

active

Fidelity Bank Nigeria

active

FirstRand South Africa

active

FMO Netherlands

active

HSBC United Kingdom

active

ING Netherlands

active

Intesa Sanpaolo Italy

active

JPMorgan Chase United States

active

KB Financial Group South Korea

active

KfW IPEX-Bank Germany

active

Korea Development Bank (KDB) South Korea

active

Manulife Canada

active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Japan

active

Mizuho Financial Group Japan

active

National Australia Bank (NAB) Australia

active

Natixis France

active

NatWest Group United Kingdom

active

Nedbank South Africa

active

Nordea Finland

active

Rabobank Netherlands

active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Canada

active

Scotiabank Canada

active

Shinsei Bank Japan

active

Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (SEB) Sweden

active

Société Générale France

active

Standard Bank South Africa

active

Standard Chartered United Kingdom

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Japan

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Japan

active

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank) Canada

active

UK Export Finance United Kingdom

active

UniCredit Italy

active

Wells Fargo United States

active
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related Dodgy Deals

Projects

active

Coastal GasLink pipeline Canada

Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
target

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) Uganda

Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil
target

Mozambique LNG Mozambique

LNG Terminal | Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
active

Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) - international -

Oil and Gas Extraction | Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
active

Vung Ang II coal power plant Vietnam

Coal Electric Power Generation
There are no projects active for this item now.
on record

Cirebon 2 coal power plant Indonesia

Coal Electric Power Generation
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted