BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Dodgy Deals ›
Dodgy Deal
Vung Ang II coal power plantVietnam

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

climate@banktrack.org

Hong Hoang, CHANGE

Last update: 2021-12-23 00:00:00
The Vung Ang I thermal power plant in Ha Tinh. Photo: Nhân Dân

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

climate@banktrack.org

Hong Hoang, CHANGE

Last update: 2021-12-23 00:00:00
Why this profile?

Why this profile?

The construction of the Vung Ang II coal power plant will exacerbate environmental pollution and health hazards in the Ha Tinh province, Vietnam. The construction of the plant and the coal ash it produces will negatively impact local farming land. Increased coal plant emissions will also increase the number of deaths that are already caused by such emissions in the area. Vung Ang II will also negatively affect the global climate crisis through its fossil fuel emissions and impact on aquatic ecosystems.

What must happen

The construction of the Vung Ang II power plant stands in contrast to the aspirations of the Vietnamese Government and the Paris Climate agreement. The Vietnam government demanded serious efforts to reduce global warming and should, hence, live up to its ambitions and withdraw the permission for new, not yet constructed coal power plants - a step that Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung announced in 2016. The Vietnam Sustainable Energy Alliance (VSEA) has, in cooperation with the WWF, published a study according to which Vietnam can receive 100% of its electricity demand from renewable energy.

Financial instutions must not participate in the financing of this project in any way. JBIC should immediately pull out of the project because it does not comply with its own standards as the project lacks social and ecological acceptability. The private Japanese banks involved should close the loop holes in their coal policies and withdraw their support for the Vung Ang II coal power plant.

About
Sectors Coal Electric Power Generation
Location
Status
Planning
Design
Agreement
Construction
Operation
Closure
Decommission
Website https://www.pvn.vn/sites/en/Pages/detailv4.aspx?NewsID=2d02afe3-af8c-4566-ba06-4a01d0056539
This project has been identified as an Equator Project

The Vung Ang II coal power plant is part of the Vung Ang thermal power centre and is the second complex of the coal-fired electricity generating plant located in the Vung Ang industrial zone, Ky Loi commune, Ky Anh district, Ha Tinh province in Vietnam. Vung Ang II will be constructed adjacent to Vung Ang I which is already in operation. It consists of two turbines with a total capacity of 1,200 MW. The first unit is expected to be commissioned in 2024, the second one in 2025. Both will be fueled by imported anthracite, hard coal.

Impacts

Social and human rights impacts

Local health and livelihoods The construction of the Vung Ang II coal power plant will exacerbate negative health and livelihoods impacts local communities are already dealing with, as the power plant will be constructed on a site next to the Formosa Steel plant and the Vung Ang I coal power plant. Both of these plants have been heavily opposed by local communities and have already caused environmental disasters as well as health issues in the area.

In 2016, a toxic chemical spill occurred at the Formosa Steel plant. This disaster caused miles of ocean coastline to become unfishable, which deprived local communities of both food and income. The Vung Ang I coal power plant is considered controversial as well, because of the close proximity of its ash pile to residential areas and farmland, as well as the air pollution the plant causes.

According to a study by Harvard University, pollution from coal power plants in Southeast Asia, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan causes 20,000 premature deaths annually. The study states that, if all planned coal projects are constructed, this number could rise to 70,000 deaths per year by 2030. The research also found that Vietnam is one of the countries most affected by this air pollution.

The construction of Vung Ang II alongside the already existing plants will worsen pollution and health hazards for local communities.

Consultation with local communities According to Friends of the Earth (FOE) Japan, there are signs that ''there was a failure to ensure proper information disclosure and obtain consent from residents''. For instance, FOE Japan states that media reported a meeting that officials held in October 2019 during which local residents were forced to sign papers agreeing to sell their farmland despite the price not being set yet. Furthermore, it is reported that some families that had been relocated for the construction of the Vung Ang I coal power plant were not informed that they would have to be relocated once more for the Vung Ang II coal power plant.

Other issues around consultation were already identified in the Environmental Impact Assessment that was signed off in 2011. Read more about these issues here.


Environmental and climate impacts

Climate change The Vietnamese government has demanded serious efforts to reduce global warming. In 2016 it announced that it would drop plans for further coal-fired power plants. The Vietnam Sustainable Energy Alliance (VSEA) has, in cooperation with the WWF, published a study according to which Vietnam can supply 100% of its electricity demand from renewable energy, proving that there is no need for the plant in the first instance.

Besides the fact that this coal power plant contradicts government demands and is not needed, its construction and operation will cause a worsening of climate change. All fossil fuel expansion is incompatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement and significantly decreases our chances of staying below 1.5°C of global warming.

Air pollution The Vung Ang II coal power plant will cause severe impacts on air quality once in operation. Major air pollutants from the plant include sulphur-dioxide (SO2), nitrogen-oxide (NOx) and fine particulate matter (PM). According to Market Forces, the emissions caused by these pollutants are much higher than limits for new coal plants in other countries.

In addition to smoke, the plant will create a huge amount of coal ash. The disposal of this ash poses significant threats to the environment, such as the contamination of ground and surface water.

Water use is another environmental concern. The Vung Ang II coal power plant will use sea water for cooling, after which the heated water will be discharged back into the sea. This discharged water is usually between 5 and 11°C hotter than its original temperature. This “thermal water” threatens aquatic ecosystems, affecting the livelihoods of communities as well as the local ecology.

International standards According to the Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (ELAW), the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment that was signed off in 2018 does not align with international standards. In April 2020, ELAW found that the 2018 report:

  1. Failed to examine alternatives that prevent or minimise adverse environmental impacts of the proposed thermal power plant;
  2. Used the wrong choice of an air pollutant dispersion model that renders meaningless predictions of air quality impacts;
  3. Applied weaker emission standards for the project than those used internationally;
  4. Allowed continued wet handling of ash contrary to international guidelines; 
  5. Allowed discharge of thermal effluent in excess of international guidelines; and
  6. Erroneously dismissed potentially significant impacts to marine species.

Already in 2016, Deputy Minister of Natural Resources and Environment Nguyen Manh Hien stated that the methodology of drafting Environmental Impact Assessments is often inaccurate and has in the past led to environmental disasters and pollution. The Minister for Resources and Environment, Hong Ha, said that the "regulation on EIA has proved infeasible, making it hard to have high-quality EIA reports."

Financiers

The Vung Ang II coal power plant requires an investment of USD 2.5 billion. According to IJGlobal, the project has a debt-equity ratio of 80:20.

According to IJGlobal's latest update (October 23, 2020), the group of banks listed below provided a USD 1,740 million loan for the development of the Vung Ang II project. BNP Paribas is cited as financial advisor to the term loan.

In December 2020, JBIC stated that it would co-finance the loan with USD 636 million.

Institution type
Finance type
Year

Inititally, the banks lining up to provide financing for this project included MUFG, Mizuho, SMBC, Sumitomo Trust, DBS, OCBC Bank and Standard Chartered.

BNP Paribas acted as financial advisor to these potential lenders. It was reported that this mandate, dating back to 2009 and ending in November 2017, would not be prolonged due to BNP Paribas' new coal policy (which also makes that BNP Paribas will not finance this Dodgy Deal). Reportedly, the bank was replaced by Mizuho in 2018.

In November 2019, OCBC Bank was reported to have moved away from this Dodgy Deal. The other Singaporean bank, DBS, also withdrew from the project.

In December 2019, Standard Chartered withdrew its financial support for this Dodgy Deal. In 2018, Standard Chartered stated that it would no longer finance new coal-fired power plants anywhere in the world, unless a commitment was already made to a project. One of these projects was Vung Ang II. In 2019 the bank confirmed it would withdraw from this project, thereby closing the loopholes in its 2018 policy.

Companies

The Vung Ang II coal power plant is owned by the Vung Ang II Thermal Coal Power Company (VAPCO), which is a special purpose vehicle (SPV), currently 100% owned by OneEnergy. OneEnergy is a 50:50 joint venture between CLP Holdings and Mitsubishi Corp.

As of May 2020, the companies owning the Vung Ang II coal power plant are Mitsubishi Corporation (40%), KEPCO (40%) and Chugoku (20%). These three companies together provide the equity needed for the project (USD 500 million).

Chugoku Electric Power

Japan
Website

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO)

South Korea
Profile
Website

Mitsubishi

Japan
Website
No companies

CLP Holdings was initially also involved in the development of Vung Ang II. In December 2019, CLP withdrew from the project as it announced it will no longer finance new coal-fired power plants. CLP Holdings was replaced with KEPCO, who acquired its 40% stake in Vung Ang II.

News
BankTrack
Partners
Blog
External
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

The Equator Principles are not stopping banks from funding fossil fuels

Following their new report, Hannah Greep from BankTrack discusses how The Equator Principles are failing the climate.
BankTrack quoted
2021-11-23 | Economy, Land and Climate Insight
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Equator Banks involved in financing at least 200 fossil fuel projects since Paris

BankTrack research sheds new light on finance for fossil fuels by Equator banks
2021-10-26 | BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Ahead of shareholder vote, activists stage global actions urging Japanese megabank MUFG to end climate-destructive financing

2021-06-23 | Tokyo | BankTrack, 350.org Japan, Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD), Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

HSBC, Barclays challenged over bond linked to Vietnamese coal project

2021-02-24 | Reuters
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Greta Thunberg joins Asian charge against Vietnam coal plant

2021-02-01 | Tokyo | Nikkei Asia
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Japan Funds Coal Plant In Vietnam, Risking Green Backlash

2020-12-30 | Bloomberg Green
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Mitsubishi Corp. faces investor backlash over Vietnam coal plant

2020-12-30 | Nikkei Asia
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Kepco greenlights controversial Vung Ang 2 coal power plant project

2020-10-05 | The Korea Herald
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Samsung targeted by NGOs for proposal to build coal power station in Vietnam

2020-08-12 | Eco Business
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Will Vietnam’s new energy policy mark a turning point for coal?

2020-07-22 | Eco-Business
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

International petition: Japan must not support Vung Ang 2 coal power plant in Vietnam

127 organizations from more than 40 countries and regions sign petition to Japanese public and private sectors
2020-05-26 | 350.org Japan, Friends of the Earth Japan, Kiko Network, The Asian Peoples
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Additional lenders considering Vung Ang 2

2020-05-04 | Copyright 2020 IJGlobal, all rights reserved
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Environment minister opposes Vietnam coal-fired project involving Japan firm

2020-01-22 | The Mainichi
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Leading NGOs urge Vietnam to scrap new coal-fired power projects

2020-01-02 | VN Express
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Standard Chartered's coal deals undermine leadership of Equator Principles

2019-11-18 | Market Forces, BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

OCBC is now coal-free: Singapore bank drops out of final coal project

2019-11-01
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

OCBC is now coal-free: Singapore bank drops out of final coal project

2019-11-01 | Eco Business
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

DBS gambles on coal, as scrutiny arrives at its AGM

2019-04-25 | Market Forces
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Standard Chartered tries to have it both ways on coal

2019-01-21 | Asia Times
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Major banks are failing Vietnam by violating Equator Principles commitments in financing coal power projects

2018-10-11 | Market Forces
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

One step beyond coal - New policy move from Standard Chartered welcomed

2018-09-25 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

HSBC and Standard Chartered accused of “rank hypocrisy” for financing of highly polluting coal projects whilst publicly supporting Paris Climate Agreement

Two major British banks are helping to finance coal-fired power stations that will emit more carbon dioxide than the annual emissions of 69% of the world’s countries, a new Global Witness report reveals
2018-07-23 | London | Global Witness
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Coal turns up heat on Standard Chartered

2018-07-23 | The Times
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

MPI refuses to license Vung Ang 2 thermal power

2018-07-07 | Vietnam Investment Review
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

OneEnergy proposed as sole investor of Vung Ang 2 thermal power plant

2018-06-05 | Vietnam Investment Review
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Singaporean banks blowing smoke on climate

2018-01-10 | Melbourne | Market Forces
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Banks mandated on Vietnam Vung Ang 2 coal-fired

2017-01-23 | IJGlobal
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Mitsubishi-led group awarded contract for $2.2bn thermal plant in central Vietnam

2017-01-17 | Tuoi Tre News
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Southeast Asia’s coal boom could cause 70,000 deaths per year by 2030, report says

2017-01-16 | Mongabay
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

The blacklist: Vietnam names and shames projects with high pollution risks

2016-10-21 | Vnexpress.net
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Comment: Vietnam’s coal decision is the Paris Agreement in action

2016-01-15 | Unearthed
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Vietnam, OneEnergy to build $1.2 bln power plant

2007-08-31 | Reuters
Resources
Documents
Images
Links
2020-03-31 00:00:00

Why investors should divest from Mitsubishi Corporation

NGO document
2020-03-31 00:00:00 | No Coal, Go Green! Project
2018-11-08 00:00:00

Letter from Standard Chartered to BankTrack on new coal policy and Fossil Banks, No Thanks! demands

Correspondence
2018-11-08 00:00:00 | Standard Chartered
2016-06-30 00:00:00

Synthesis Report on Socio-environmental Impacts of Coal and Coal-red Power Plants in Vietnam

NGO document
2016-06-30 00:00:00 | GreenID, CleanED, Vietnam Sustainable Energy Alliance
2017-03-15 00:00:00

Burden of Disease from Rising Coal-Fired Power Plant Emissions in Southeast Asia

NGO document
2017-03-15 00:00:00 | Environmental Science & Technology

Vung Ang II thermal power plant

2017-03-15
Vung Ang 1 thermal power plant in Ha Tinh A corner of Vung Ang 2 thermal power plant The Vung Ang 2 thermal power plant

The risk of pollution from coal-fired power

The development of coal-fired power is still an important solution to meet the needs of energy in the future. The problem here is sustainable development.

Unclear laws contribute to environmental crisis

Vietnam is facing great environmental challenges due to a widespread disregard of the law, poor-quality environmental impact assessments, and overlapping regulations in the laws on Environmental Protection and Investment.

Market Forces webpage on Vung Ang II

Vung Ang II profile on Global Energy Monitor

Updates

2020

2020-12-30 00:00:00 | Japan funds Vung Ang II, despite climate vows

On December 30, 2020, Bloomberg Green reported that Japan has approved a plan to help finance the Vung Ang II coal power plant. The Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) will provide USD 636 million for the construction of the project. The total amount of project finance is co-financed with private banks and the Export-Import Bank of Korea (see also the ''financiers'' section of this profile). This decision goes against Japan's pledge for net-zero emissions by 2050 and stricter conditions when investing in coal projects abroad.

2020-10-05 00:00:00 | Kepco proceeds with Vung Ang 2 coal power project

On October 5, Korea Power Corp. (Kepco) decided to proceed with the Vung Ang 2 coal power plant project in Vietnam. Kepco’s approval comes amid global pressure from environmental and investment groups calling for the company to halt the project.

2020-05-26 00:00:00 | 127 organisation urge Japan to withdraw from Vung Ang II

On May 26, Japanese NGOs submitted a petition for the cancellation of Vung Ang II to the Japanese public and private sectors. The petition was signed by 127 organisation from more than 40 countries. The recipients included the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), three megabanks that are considering financing the project (MUFG, Mizuho and SMBC), Mitsubishi Corporation, and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Read more here.

2020-04-30 00:00:00 | ELAW finds significant problems with Vung Ang II's Environmental Impact Assessment

In April 2020, the Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (ELAW) published their evaluation of the 2018 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for Vung Ang II. In this evaluation, ELAW found that the EIA does not align with international standards as it:

  1. Failed to examine alternatives that prevent or minimise adverse environmental impacts of the proposed thermal power plant;
  2. Used the wrong choice of an air pollutant dispersion model that renders meaningless predictions of air quality impacts;
  3. Applied weaker emission standards for the project than those used internationally;
  4. Allowed continued wet handling of ash contrary to international guidelines;
  5. Allowed discharge of thermal effluent in excess of international guidelines; and
  6. Erroneously dismissed potentially significant impacts to marine species.

Read the complete evaluation here.

2020-02-14 00:00:00 | New commission dates

The National Steering Committee on power development reported that Unit 1 is scheduled to be commissioned in Q1 2024 and Unit 2 in Q2 2025.

2019

2019-12-19 00:00:00 | CLP Holdings quits coal

In December 2019, CLP Holdings announced that it will no longer invest in new coal-fired power plants and that it will progressively phase out all remaining coal assets by 2050. With this move, CLP is pulling out of all proposed coal-fired power projects it was already involved in, including Vung Ang II and Vinh Tan III.

2019-10-29 00:00:00 | NGOs call on JBIC not to finance the Vung Ang 2 coal-fired power plant in Vietnam

In October 2019, more then 30 NGOs sent a letter to the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) demanding that the bank withdraw from financing Vung Ang II. Find more information and the letter here.

2019-06-04 00:00:00 | Completion date delayed

In June 2019, the Ministry of Industry and Trade reported that the completion date for Unit 1 is delayed to 2023 and the completion date for Unit 2 is delayed to 2024.

2019-03-29 00:00:00 | Vung Ang II is going to use ultrasupercritical technology

In March 2019, OneEnergy reported that the Vung Ang II coal power plant is going to use ultrasupercritical technology, instead of supercritical technology.

2018

2018-07-11 00:00:00 | Ministry of Planning and Investment refuses to grant an investment registration certificate

In June 2018, it was reported that REE transferred its entire holding in VAPCO to OneEnergy. This led VAPCO to apply for authorisation for OneEnergy to become the sole owner of Vung Ang II. In July 2018, the Ministry of Planning and Investment refused to grant an investment registration certificate to OneEnergy to develop the power plant. This decision was based on Decree 63/2018 which says that authorities shall not issue investment certificates for projects executed under the public-prive partnership model. Besides that, the Ministry found several issues in OneEnergy's dossier. Several conditions appeared not to have been met. First of all, the environmental impact assessment for the project was approved by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment over two years ago, which means that the assessment is no longer valid. Furthermore, OneEnergy requested an area of 94.6 hectares for the project, while only 86 hectares had been approved by the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Lastly, it was found that OneEnergy does not meet the requirements regarding investment and equity capital. The equity needed is set at USD 555.5 million, 25.4% of the total investment. However, in 2018 the equity was only USD 26.37 million.

These findings led the Ministry of Planning and Investment to ask the Ministry of Industry and Trade and OneEnergy to consider the opinions from relevant ministries and agencies and then develop the project in compliance with regulations.

 

2016

2016-10-21 00:00:00 | The blacklist: Vietnam names and shames projects with high pollution risks

Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade has announced projects which it considers are potentially risky to the environment. In a statement, the ministry listed 28 plants which need “special monitoring”, with nearly half of them being coal-fired power projects invested by state power utility Electricity of Vietnam (EVN) and national oil and gas group PetroVietnam. One of the plants in the list, the 1,200MW Vinh Tan II project, grabbed headlines last year due to the environmental pollution it caused (source Vnexpress.net).

Send feedback on this profile
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted