BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › BankTrack news ›
BankTrack News

Climate activists challenge Standard Bank’s plans to fund fossil fuel expansion in Africa

At the bank's AGM, 99.7% of shareholders support climate resolution by Just Share and Aeon Investment Management
2022-06-01
By: BankTrack, Africa Institute for Energy Governance, Bank on our Future, Friends of the Earth Mozambique, Greenfaith International, Just Share & Laudato Si
Contact:

Ryan Brightwell, Human Rights Campaign Lead, BankTrack, +31 6 346 431 16

Annette Gibbs, Communications Manager, Just Share, +2782 467 1295

Protest outside Standard Bank's AGM in May 2022. Photo: Extinction Rebellion South Africa and Extinction Rebellion Gauteng
2022-06-01
By: BankTrack, Africa Institute for Energy Governance, Bank on our Future, Friends of the Earth Mozambique, Greenfaith International, Just Share & Laudato Si
Contact:

Ryan Brightwell, Human Rights Campaign Lead, BankTrack, +31 6 346 431 16

Annette Gibbs, Communications Manager, Just Share, +2782 467 1295

At Standard Bank’s annual general meeting (AGM) on 31 May, climate activists from Africa and abroad gathered (virtually) to demand answers from the bank on its involvement in the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), gas extraction in Mozambique, and its support for fossil fuel expansion on the continent. 

For the fourth year in a row, the board and executives were inundated with questions from members of the global #StopEACOP campaign about the bank’s reckless approach to climate risk in Africa. At the same time, activists from 350Africa, EarthLife Africa, and XR South Africa protested outside Standard Bank’s headquarters, demanding an end to fossil fuel financing, and an immediate commitment to withdraw its involvement in EACOP. 

Also at the AGM, 99.7% of shareholders voted in favour of a resolution filed by Just Share and Aeon Investment Management. The resolution requested that the bank calculate and disclose the financed greenhouse gas emissions from its exposure to oil and gas, and set targets for reducing that exposure in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. 

Standard Bank states that it supports the Paris Agreement. However, this support appears to focus exclusively on only one element of the Paris Agreement: “the principle of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in light of different national circumstances”. 

This principle recognises that developed nations have contributed most to anthropogenic climate change, and that they should make the fastest and most dramatic cuts to carbon emissions. Developing nations require resources and support from developed nations to achieve their own just transitions, and may require longer to do so. 

Standard Bank, however, contends that this principle means that Africa must continue to exploit fossil fuels, because these are necessary to “support access to reliable energy that supports economic growth and poverty alleviation”. This position is not in line with climate science, nor with the reality of fossil fuel extraction in Africa. The financial benefits of this extraction are overwhelmingly exported to developed nations, while Africans bear the brunt of the devastating social and environmental impacts. 

The EACOP is a case in point: a 1443km heated crude oil pipeline that will transport oil extracted by TotalEnergies in Uganda (including from inside the Murchison Falls National Park), through multiple areas of sensitive and irreplaceable biodiversity, displacing thousands of local people from their land, to the Port of Tanga in Tanzania, where it will be exported to foreign markets.

Another example is the bank’s financial backing of liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects in Mozambique’s war-ridden gas region. Despite the various gas investment projects, Mozambique remains one of the poorest, least-developed and most heavily-indebted countries in the world. Annual growth rates have progressively fallen, and external debt as a proportion of GDP has trebled. Since most of the domestic gas allocation will be sold overseas, new gas production will not directly support increased energy access in Mozambique. As Ilham Rawoot of Justiça Ambiental (JA!)/Friends of the Earth Mozambique points out, “although many other financiers are doing a full reassessment of their involvement in these LNG projects, Standard Bank continues to fund them. Despite the claims that gas production would improve Mozambican government revenues, support wider economic development, and address energy needs, Mozambicans are poorer than they were a decade ago and the country will be left with stranded assets and no resources to support an alternative development pathway.”

As Diana Nabiruma, from the Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO) recently told the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, “which oil-producing community in Africa is rich? Are the communities in the Niger Delta rich? Are the people in the Central African Republic rich? Who are you trying to fool?”

Activist shareholders representing civil society organisations AFIEGO, the Laudato Si Movement, BankTrack, 350Africa, JA!/Friends of the Earth Mozambique, Just Share, and the Centre for Environmental Rights asked detailed and specific questions at the AGM. 

Nevertheless, Standard Bank’s CEO, Sim Tshabalala, its Chairman, Thulani Gcabashe, and other executives repeatedly deflected these questions by referring to the Group’s Climate Change Policy, which it states “is based on the imperative of the just transition for Africa and the principle of common but differentiated responsibility for countries at differentiated levels of development codified in the Paris Agreement”. 

In a rare direct response, Tshabalala committed to ensuring that the Social and Environmental Consultant’s report into the EACOP project, commissioned by Standard Bank, would be made publicly available, but declined to say whether the final report had raised any “red flags”. The Consultant, named as Golder Associates, has now provided its final report to the lenders and it is under review. 

Ryan Brightwell, Human Rights Campaign Lead at BankTrack commented, "Standard Bank repeatedly stressed at its AGM that it has not made a decision about whether to finance EACOP. But the bank has been acting as a financial advisor to the project for four years, so it is helping to facilitate it. Standard Bank is already involved and implicated in the severe social, environmental and climate impacts this oil pipeline will cause and the human rights impacts it has already led to. It is time for the bank to stop prevaricating, step away from EACOP for good, and instead dedicate its resources to supporting an alternative, clean development path for East Africa.”

More than 20 banks, including most of TotalEnergies’ largest bankers, have made it publicly known that they will not join the project loan.

Banks

Standard Bank

South Africa
Active
Dodgy Deals

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda
Project
Target
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda

Mozambique LNG

Mozambique
Project
Target
Oil and Gas Extraction | ...

Mozambique LNG

Mozambique
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

TotalEnergies

France
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction | ...

TotalEnergies

France
There are no active company profiles for this item now.
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted