BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
International Bank Campaigners Gathering
Donate
2023-05-25 00:00:00
Philippines communities are fighting back against gas & LNG build-out in the Verde Island Passage
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
Connect
2023-05-03 00:00:00
A Rotten Business: How Barclays became the go-to bank for JBS, one of the world's most destructive meat corporations
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
2023-03-29 00:00:00
BankTrack Annual Report 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
End Coal Finance
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Intesa Sanpaolo shareholders’ meeting

Climate commitments are vague and weak. Investors ask for an urgent change of course
2022-04-28
By: ReCommon
Intesa Sanpaolo AGM. Photo: ReCommon
2022-04-28
By: ReCommon

On the occasion of the Shareholders’ Meeting of Intesa Sanpaolo, ReCommon highlights the high exposure of the top Italian bank to the fossil fuels sector and disclose a letter signed by a group of investors urging Intesa’s top management to raise the level of ambition of its commitments on climate and the environment.

This year’s shareholders’ meeting, that will be held behind closed doors for the third year in a row even though the group’s statute provides for telematic participation methods that are not granted, is an important opportunity for shareholders to urge the bank to raise its climate ambition.

In this sense, a group of investors sent a letter to the CEO of Intesa Sanpaolo, Carlo Messina, expressing concern about the banking group’s high exposure to the fossil fuels industry, despite the first commitments taken by the bank on coal and unconventional oil&gas.

Signatories of the letter are Ecofi Investissement and Bank fur Kirche und Caritas, both members of Shareholders for Change and ACTIAM, Dutch asset manager with assets amounting to EUR 20 billion who recently announced its divestment from TotalEnergies, expressing concern about the involvement of the French company in the devastating East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project.

In 2021 alone, Intesa Sanpaolo granted US$ 6.4 billion* to coal, oil and gas. On the coal sector, the financial exposure is mainly driven by the subscription of bonds (increased sixfold between 2020 and 2021) where the proceeds are linked to generic purposes, most often the core business of fossil fuels companies. Financing also includes US$ 136 million to the Sasol (South Africa) and, above all, US$ 226 million to RWE (Germany), the most polluting company in Europe. On oil&gas, between 2016 and 2021 Intesa Sanpaolo granted US$ 5.5 billion to six of the eight fossil fuels companies listed in the three main rankings of Urgewald’s Global Oil and Gas Exit List: Chevron, Exxon, Equinor, Gazprom, Shell and Total. As for investments in the fossil fuel business, as of 1 January 2022 they amounted to EUR 4 billion.

This high and growing exposure to the fossil fuels business is the result of climate commitments that are vague, weak, and limited. In light of these factors, the group of investors has written to Intesa’s top management with the request to bolster its coal policy – in order to include all financial services and provide for a phase out date from the entire coal sector, not only coal mining – and to expand the applicability of its policy on non-conventional oil&gas, primarily by excluding the possibility of financing onshore projects in the Arctic, such as those of the Russian company Novatek, which Intesa Sanpaolo financed (Yamal LNG, 2016) and committed to finance (Arctic LNG-2, 2021).

"This year too it was not possible to attend in presence the Shareholders’ ‘Meeting and urge the bank’s management to improve its climate commitments", comment Daniela Finamore and Simone Ogno of ReCommon. "Little ambition, too many gaps and loopholes allow Intesa to continue to support, in an increasing way, the fossil fuels industry. For this reason, Intesa is considered the No.1 fossil bank in Italy. Even those who invest in the banking group are asking for an urgent change of course that is in line with the urgency required by the climate crisis".

*The data, as of 01.01.2022, have been processed by ReCommon on the basis of financial research conducted by Profundo.

 

From www.ReCommon.org

Banks

Intesa Sanpaolo

Italy
Active
Dodgy Deals

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda
Project
Target
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

ExxonMobil

United States
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction

ExxonMobil

United States

Gazprom

Russian Federation
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction

Gazprom

Russian Federation

RWE

Germany
Company
active
Coal Electric Power Generation | ...

RWE

Germany

Shell

United Kingdom
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction | ...

Shell

United Kingdom

TotalEnergies

France
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction | ...

TotalEnergies

France
There are no active company profiles for this item now.
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel End Coal Finance Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted