BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

SMBC misses critical opportunity to be a climate leader

SMBC’s new climate policy falls well short of Mizuho’s
2020-04-20 | Tokyo
By: Rainforest Action Network
Contact:

Emma Rae Lierley

Communications Manager, Forests

425-281-1989 emma@ran.org

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation head offices.. Photo: 撮影。via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)
2020-04-20 | Tokyo
By: Rainforest Action Network
Contact:

Emma Rae Lierley

Communications Manager, Forests

425-281-1989 emma@ran.org

Tokyo – Today, Japan’s third-largest bank – Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC) announced half-hearted revisions to its ESG financing policies, affecting its financing of coal, oil & gas, and deforestation. The announcement comes one day after Japan’s second-largest bank – Mizuho Financial Group announced its own suite of policies to impressively bolster its climate risk management.  While these banks’ policies are still insufficient to meet Paris Agreement goals, they mark a sea change from two years ago. All eyes are now on the leadership of Japan’s largest bank – Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG, TYO: 8306), which until now had the strongest climate policy among the three banks and is expected to announce its own policy revisions within the next month.

“With this policy, SMBC missed a critical opportunity to be a climate leader in Japan. By signing the UN Principles for Responsible Banking, SMBC pledged to align its financing with the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals, but it is far from accomplishing that. SMBC needs to immediately go back to the drawing board,” said Hana Heineken, Senior Responsible Finance Campaigner at Rainforest Action Network. 

Japan is the third-largest economy in the world and its three largest banks are among the top twenty largest global banks by assets, with MUFG at #5 in the world. Japanese banks have historically lagged behind their peers in Europe, the US, and even financial centers like Singapore, which have progressively tightened their financing policies on fossil fuels and deforestation-driving commodities, most notably coal and palm oil. Last year, all three Japanese banks endorsed the UN Principles for Responsible Banking, creating a wide gap between their sustainability commitments and practice. The Japanese banks’ financial tentacles have global reach, including controversial new coal plants in Vietnam and Indonesia, forest fires and exploitative palm oil plantations in Indonesia, and conflict-ridden tar sands pipelines in the US. (Note 1)  In March of this year, MUFG and Mizuho were named the 6th and 9th largest financiers of fossil fuels in the world, while all three banks, led by SMBC, are some of the largest financiers of deforestation in Southeast Asia. 

SMBC’s policy is weaker than Mizuho’s in many respects. For example, its policy on financing commodities like palm oil, pulp & paper, and timber lack a No Deforestation, No Peatland, No Exploitation (NDPE) policy or requirement for Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), which is necessary for achieving the SDGs. (Note 2) SMBC makes no commitment to phase out coal financing and instead pledges only to stop financing new coal plants “in principle,” while lauding ultrasupercritical coal plants as “environmentally friendly.” (Note 3) SMBC’s new prohibition on mountaintop removal coal mining projects and recognition of social and environmental risks in the oil & gas sectors mark some progress, but is devoid of climate-related restrictions. 

MUFG’s highly anticipated policy revision will be met with disappointment if it does not exceed Mizuho’s new standards. As the largest bank in Japan, with significant banking operations around the world, MUFG has a unique responsibility to institute the strongest climate policy among these three banks and even match its global peers. 

 

Note to Editors:

  1. Other examples of controversial projects and companies linked to SMBC include the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), Sumitomo Corporation, and a coal export terminal in California. 
  2. For more information on NDPE, see PRI Statement on Sustainable Palm Oil
  3. For a further critique of SMBC’s coal policy, see Joint NGO Statement

The article is published at: https://www.ran.org/press-releases/smbc-misses-critical-opportunity-to-be-a-climate-leader/

See also: https://sekitan.jp/jbic/en/2020/04/16/3972 

 

 

Banks

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group

Japan
Active
Dodgy Deals

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda
Project
Target
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)

Uganda
There are no active project profiles for this item now.
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted