Agricultural Bank of ChinaChina

Active

This profile is actively maintained
Created before Nov 2016
Last update: 2021-01-21 00:00:00
Send feedback on this profile
Download as PDF
Share this page:

About Agricultural Bank of China

The predecessor of the Agricultural Bank of China was the Agricultural Cooperative Bank, established in 1951. Since the late 1970s, the bank has evolved from a state-owned specialized bank to a wholly state-owned commercial bank and subsequently to a state-controlled commercial bank. The bank was restructured into a joint stock limited liability company in January 2009. In July 2010, the bank was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. At the launch of the listing, the bank had the world's largest initial public offering (IPO) at that time. It's ranked fifht in Forbes Global 2000 list of the world's biggest public companies.

Website http://www.abchina.com/en/
Headquarters
No.69, Jianguomen, NeiAvenue, Dongcheng District
100005 Beijing
China
CEO/chair Gu Shu, Zhang Qingsong and Zhang Xuguang
Executive Directors
Supervisor
China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC)
Annual reports Annual report 2019
CSR report 2019
Ownership
listed on Hong Kong Stock Exchange & Shanghai Stock Exchange

The main shareholder of Agricultural Bank of China is Huijin Investment, a state-owned investment company, which holds 40.03% of the shares.

Complaints and grievances

Agricultural Bank of China does not operate a complaints channel for individuals and communities that may be adversely affected by its finance.

The bank’s Customer Service Center can be contacted at 95599@abchina.com.

Related Dodgy Deals

Agricultural Bank Of China has been linked to the following "Dodgy Deals", e.g. as a current or past financier or through an expression of interest. Find out more about dodgy deals here. See the project or company profile for more details on the nature of the bank's link to the Dodgy Deal.

Dodgy Deals map

All
|
Projects
|
Companies
Targets
|
Active profiles
|
On record profiles

Policy Assessments

Banks, climate and energy

Bank policy scores on fossil fuel financing

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

A bank can obtain a total of 200 policy points for its fossil fuel policies; 120 possible points for oil and gas policies and 80 possible points for coal policies. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 50 points
50.5 - 100 points
100.5 - 150 points
150.5 - 200 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on fossil fuel expansion

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The scores for a bank's policies restricting expansion of fossil fuels - in each area, prohibitions against financing projects and/or companies expanding that area - are aggregated into a fossil fuel expansion policy score.

The point-based policy ranking for fossil fuel expansion consists of the following distribution:

  • Coal mining: 14 points​
  • Coal power: 14 points
  • Other coal: 7 points
  • Tar sands: 7 points
  • Arctic oil and gas: 7 points
  • Offshore oil and gas: 7 points
  • Fracked oil and gas: 7 points
  • LNG: 7 points
  • Other oil and gas: 12 points

A bank can obtain a total of 82 policy points for its fossil fuel expansion policy. Based on this score, banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 20.5 points
21 - 41 points
41.5 - 61.5 points
62 - 82 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on oil and gas financing

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

For tar sands, Arctic oil and gas, fracked oil and gas, offshore oil and gas and LNG, 18 possible policy points can be obtained. For other/conventional oil and gas, 30 policy points can be obtained. In total, a bank can score a total of 120 policy points for its oil and gas policies. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 30 points
30.5 - 60 points
60.5 - 90 points
90.5 - 120 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on tar sands

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking above assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for tar sands projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1), moderate exclusion (2), strong exclusion (3)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand tar sands.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), strong exclusion (4)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for tar sands.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in tar sands above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), moderate exclusion threshold (4), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 18 policy points for its tar sands policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 4.5 points
5 - 9 points
9.5 - 13.5 points
14 - 18 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on Arctic oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for Arctic oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1), moderate exclusion (2), strong exclusion (3)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand Arctic oil and gas. 

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), strong exclusion (4)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for Arctic oil and gas.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in Arctic oil and gas above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), moderate exclusion threshold (4), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 18 policy points for its Arctic oil and gas policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 4.5 points
5 - 9 points
9.5 - 13.5 points
14 - 18 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on offshore oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for offshore oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1), strong exclusion (3)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand offshore oil and gas.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), strong exclusion (4)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for offshore oil and gas.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in offshore oil and gas above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 18 policy points for its offshore oil and gas policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 4.5 points
5 - 9 points
9.5 - 13.5 points
14 - 18 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on fracked oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for fracked oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1), moderate exclusion (2), strong exclusion (3)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand oil and gas fracking.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), strong exclusion (4)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for oil and gas fracking.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in oil and gas fracking above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), moderate exclusion threshold (4), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 18 policy points for its fracking policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 4.5 points
5 - 9 points
9.5 - 13.5 points
14 - 18 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on LNG

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for LNG projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1), strong exclusion (3)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand LNG.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), strong exclusion (4)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for LNG.

  • None (0), reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (3), strong phase-out (5)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in LNG above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (5), full exclusion (6)

A bank can obtain a total of 18 policy points for its LNG policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 4.5 points
5 - 9 points
9.5 - 13.5 points
14 - 18 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on other/conventional oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for other/conventional oil and gas projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1.5), strong exclusion (5)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand other/conventional oil and gas. 

  • None (0), weak exclusion (3), strong exclusion (7)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for other/conventional oil and gas.

  • None (0), financing reduction (1.5), weak phase-out (6), strong phase-out (8)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in other/conventional oil and gas above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence/Equator Principles commitment (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (3), strong exclusion threshold (7), full exclusion (10)

A bank can obtain a total of 30 policy points for its other/conventional oil and gas policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 7.5 points
8 - 15 points
15.5 - 22.5 points
23 - 30 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal financing

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

For both coal mining and coal power, 32 possible policy points can be obtained, while for other coal,16 possible policy points can be obtained. So a bank can obtain a total of 80 policy points for its coal policies. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 20 points
20.5 - 40 points
40.5 - 60 points
60.5 - 80 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal mining

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for coal mining projects.

  • None (0), mountaintop removal mining exclusion (0.5), weak exclusion (2), moderate exclusion (4), strong exclusion (6)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand coal mining.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (4), strong exclusion (8)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for coal mining.

  • None (0), exposure reduction (1.5), financing reduction (3), weak phase-out (4), moderate phase-out (6), strong phase-out (8)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in coal mining above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (3), moderate exclusion threshold (5), strong exclusion threshold (8), full exclusion (10)

A bank can obtain a total of 32 policy points for its coal mining policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 8 points
8.5 - 16 points
16.5 - 24 points
24.5 - 32 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal power

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for coal power projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), moderate exclusion (4), strong exclusion (6)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand coal power.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (4), strong exclusion (8)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for coal power.

  • None (0), proportional reduction (1), exposure reduction (1.5), financing reduction (3), weak phase-out (4), moderate phase-out (6), strong phase-out (8)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in coal power above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (3), moderate exclusion threshold (5), strong exclusion threshold (8), full exclusion (10)

A bank can obtain a total of 32 policy points for its coal power policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards, followers, front runners or leaders.

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 8 points
8.5 - 16 points
16.5 - 24 points
24.5 - 32 points
For more details see this page.

Bank policy scores on coal infrastructure

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
2021-03-24
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation

The point-based policy ranking assesses bank policies in four ways:

1) Restriction on direct financing for coal infrastructure projects.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (1), strong exclusion (3)

2) Restriction on financing for companies that expand coal infrastructure.

  • None (0), weak exclusion (2), strong exclusion (4)

3) The bank’s commitment to phase-out financing for coal infrastructure.

  • None (0), exposure reduction (1), weak phase-out (2), strong phase-out (4)

4) The bank’s commitment to exclude companies active in coal infrastructure above a certain threshold.

  • None (0), enhanced due diligence (0.5), weak exclusion threshold (2), strong exclusion threshold (4), full exclusion (5)

A bank can obtain a total of 16 policy points for its coal infrastructure policy. Based on this score banks are then classified as laggards (0-4 points), followers (4.5-8 points), front runners (8.5-12 points) or leaders (12.5-16 points)

Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 4 points
4.5 - 8 points
8.5 - 12 points
12.5 - 16 points
For more details see this page.

Banks and human rights

Human Rights Benchmark Africa 2021

BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Agricultural Bank of China
CHN
0
Laggard
Explanation
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 3.5 points
4 - 5.5 points
6 - 8.5 points
9 - 14 points
For more details see this page.

News

| |
Type:
Year:
blog
external news
our news

China is world’s second largest financier of deforestation-linked commodities

New study finds significant risk associated with nearly 15 billion USD in loans and underwriting by Chinese financial institutions
2021-05-04 | BankTrack, Forests & Finance, Profundo, Rainforest Action Network
blog
external news
our news

Banking on Climate Chaos 2021: World’s 60 largest banks have poured USD 3.8 trillion into fossil fuels since Paris Agreement

Even amidst the global economic downturn, fossil fuel financing numbers were higher in 2020 than 2016
2021-03-24 | Nijmegen | BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
blog
external news
our news

Over 260 organisations call on banks not to finance Total’s East African Crude Oil Pipeline

With a final investment decision nearing, African and International organisations warn banks against joining $2.5 billion loan for a “manifestly irresponsible” project • New stopeacop.net campaign website launched.
2021-03-01 | International | BankTrack, 350.org Africa, AFIEGO, Inclusive Development International, IUCN NL
blog
external news
our news

Cambodia: Communities impacted by Lower Sesan 2 Hydropower Project seek IFC dispute resolution process; Companies' responses

2021-02-22 | BHRRC
blog
external news
our news

More than 20 Turkish BGOs demand withdrawal of finance by Chinese banks to the Hunutlu coal-fired power plant

2020-06-09 | Climate action network Europe
blog
external news
our news

Will China continue to bank on coal?

2020-06-01 | Dry Cargo International
blog
external news
our news

265 Civil society groups call on Chinese actors to ensure that Covid-19 financial relief does not bail out harmful projects

2020-05-01 | BankTrack, Inclusive Development International
blog
external news
our news

Global finance sector failing to apply conservation criteria to pulp and paper funding

2020-03-21 | New York/Amsterdam | Environmental Paper Network
blog
external news
our news

Banking on Climate Change – Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2020

New report reveals global banks funneled USD 2.7 trillion into fossil fuels Since Paris Climate Agreement, with financing on the rise each year 
2020-03-18 | Nijmegen | BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
blog
external news
our news

4 out of 5 banks failing on human rights, new BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark shows

Lloyds, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Société Générale among the poorest performers in BankTrack ranking, alongside Canadian and Chinese banks
2019-11-26 | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

BankTrack 2019 Human Rights Benchmark: criteria and scope announced

2019-06-25 | Nijmegen | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

Global Banks, Led by JPMorgan Chase, Invested $1.9 Trillion in Fossil Fuels Since Paris Climate Pact

2019-03-20 | Desmogblog.com
blog
external news
our news

Banking on Climate Change – Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2019

World's top banks have poured $1.9 trillion into fossil fuel financing since the Paris Agreement was adopted, with financing on the rise each year
2019-03-20 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack, Honor the Earth, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club
blog
external news
our news

Banks massively financing fossil fuels unclear about future of ... fossil fuels

Few banks acknowledge relation between fossil fuels and climate breakdown
2018-12-20 | Nijmegen
blog
external news
our news

Report finds major banks ramped up fossil fuel financing to $115 billion in 2017

Despite 2017 being the costliest year on record for weather disasters, new report reveals that banks increased extreme fossil fuel financing last year, led by a more than doubling in lending to tar sands companies and pipelines.
2018-03-28 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack, Honor the Earth, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club
blog
external news
our news

Investing in a Green Belt and Road? Assessing the Implementation of China’s Green Credit Guidelines Abroad

The Chinese government has become an unexpected leader in pushing for new green credit policies, but are Chinese banks doing their part to keep the belt and road initiative green?
2017-12-13 | Friends of the Earth US
blog
external news
our news

Financiers of pulp and paper industry projects will cause environmental and social harm, says new report

2017-08-01 | Mandy Haggith – Environmental Paper Network
blog
external news
our news

Call for banks to divest from APRIL

Social conflict and environmental destruction are rife in its operations
2014-12-10 | Nijmegen | BankTrack, Mandy Haggith – Environmental Paper Network
blog
external news
our news

Banks not yet living up to UN human rights principles, finds BankTrack

New research finds inadequate reporting on human rights impacts, and failure to establish mechanisms to allow complaints.
2014-12-02 | Geneva | BANKTRACK
blog
external news
our news

'Record year' for bank coal financing as latest UN climate warning looms

2014-10-29 | Nijmegen | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

Australian coal projects could be ineligible to receive Chinese finance

2013-07-24 | Melbourne | Market Forces
blog
external news
our news

Time to volunteer

2010-08-03 | China Dialogue
blog
external news
our news

Agricultural Bank of China's IPO plan approved

2010-06-09 | Xinhua | China Daily
blog
external news
our news

Chinese banks need to catch up on environmental policies

International banks must take responsibility in advocating for better standards
2007-05-09 | San Fransisco, Utrecht | Friends of the Earth US

Documents

Type:
Year:
our publications

Chinese banks’ forest-risk financing: financial flows and client risks

2021-05-06 00:00:00 | Rainforest Action Network, TuKIndonesia, BankTrack, China Environmental Paper Network, Jikalahari
our publications

Banking on Climate Chaos 2021

Fossil Fuel Finance Report
2021-03-24 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance & Sierra Club
ngo documents

Open Letter from over 260 civil society organisations to banks on EACOP

2021-02-25 00:00:00 | 263 CSOs
ngo documents

Who is who in the Chinese lending institutional landscape

2020-10-28 00:00:00 | Urgewald
annual reports

Annual report 2019

2020-05-19 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

CSR report 2019

2020-04-03 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
our publications

Banking on Climate Change - Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2020

2020-03-18 00:00:00 | Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
correspondence

Letter from BankTrack to Agricultural Bank of China on the bank's progress on its fossil fuel finance since COP24

2019-12-10 00:00:00 | BankTrack
csr policies

Sustainability Finance Framework

2019-08-31 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China - Singapore Branch
annual reports

CSR report 2018

2019-03-31 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

Annual report 2018

2019-03-29 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
csr policies

Modern Slavery Statement 2018

2018-11-22 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
correspondence

Letter from BankTrack and 120 organisations to Agricultural Bank of China on Demands FBNT campaign

2018-10-16 00:00:00 | BankTrack and 120 organisations
annual reports

Annual Report 2017

2018-05-09 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

CSR report 2017

2018-05-09 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
correspondence

Letter from 30 Indonesian NGOs to PT RAPP financiers on current situation of PT RAPP (APRIL's main supplier)

2017-11-24 00:00:00 | 30 Indonesian NGOs
annual reports

CSR report 2016

2017-03-31 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

Annual report 2016

2017-03-31 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
our publications

Green Paper, Red lines

Chinese version
2016-09-01 00:00:00 | BankTrack
annual reports

Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2015

2016-07-26 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

Annual Report 2015

2016-06-30 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
our publications

Banking with Principles? Second Edition June 2016

Benchmarking Banks against the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
2016-06-30 00:00:00 | BankTrack
our publications

Green Paper, Red Lines

Requirements for pulp and paper industry finance
2016-06-02 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Environmental Paper Network
csr policies

Green Bond Management Statement

2015-09-28 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
our publications

The end of coal?

2015 Coal Finance Report Card
2015-05-04 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club
annual reports

Corporate Social responsibility Report 2014

2015-05-01 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

Annual Report 2014

2015-03-24 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
correspondence

Letter from EPN to Banks investing in April on APRIL

2014-12-10 00:00:00 | EPN
our publications

Banking with Principles?

Benchmarking Banks against the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
2014-12-02 00:00:00 | BankTrack
our publications

Going out, but going green?

Assessing the implementation of China's Green Credit Guidelines
2014-11-25 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Friends of the Earth US
our publications

Banking on Coal 2014

2014-10-29 00:00:00 | BankTrack
annual reports

Agricultural Bank of China Limited Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2013

2014-07-02 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

2013 Annual Report

2014-05-01 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
ngo documents

Green Credit Footprint of Chinese banks (2008-2012)

-Chinese version-
2013-11-25 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
annual reports

2012 CSR Report

2013-01-01 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
annual reports

Annual Report 2012

2013-01-01 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
ngo documents

Environmental report on Chinese banks 2011

-English summary-
2012-11-26 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
correspondence

Letter from BankTrack et al. to various financial institutions on APP

2012-11-06 00:00:00 | BankTrack et al.
ngo documents

Worldwide investments in Cluster munitions, a shared responsibility

2012-06-20 00:00:00 | IKV Pax Christi & FairFin
ngo documents

Environmental Report on Chinese Banks (2011)

-Chinese version-
2012-04-18 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
ngo documents

Executive Summary of Environmental Report on Chinese Banks (2011)

2012-03-28 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
bank documents

Notice of the CBRC on Issuing the Green Credit Guidelines

2012-02-24 00:00:00 | China Banking Regulatory Commission
correspondence

民间环保组织就陆良化工铬污染事件致16家中资上市银行的公开信（Chinese）

2011-08-29 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
correspondence

An Open Letter from a Coalition of Environmental NGOs to 16 Chinese banks Regarding the Chromium Pollution Incident in Luliang(English)

2011-08-29 00:00:00 | Green Watershed
ngo documents

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #12 -English-

2011-06-24 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
other documents

Agricultural Bank of China Cluster Munitions Investments

2011-05-25 00:00:00 | Netwerk Vlaanderen & IKV Pax Christi
csr policies

Statement on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing

2011-01-05 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
ngo documents

China Sustainable Finance Newsletter #10 -English-

2010-11-29 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
ngo documents

China Sustainable Finance newsletter #9 -English-

2010-09-01 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US
other documents

Credit where its due (2)

2010-07-26 00:00:00 | Adina Matisoff, Foe US
other documents

Credit where its due (1)

2010-07-26 00:00:00 | Friends of the Earth US

Links

EPN assessment of policies against 14 minimum criteria - Agricultural Bank of China

Environmental Paper Network (EPN) evaluated the policies of 68 major financiers of the pulp and paper industry against 14 absolute minimum criteria that all financial institutions should require their clients, investments and business partners to respect in order to reduce social and environmental risks.

https://environmentalpaper.org/agricultural-bank-of-china/

Policies

Voluntary initiatives

Agricultural Bank of China has committed itself to the following voluntary standards:

Investment policies

The Agricultural Bank of China has no publicly available investment policies, nor has it a web page on corporate social responsibility. The bank only lists its most recent annual CSR reports.

Year:
csr policies

Sustainability Finance Framework

2019-08-31 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China - Singapore Branch
csr policies

Modern Slavery Statement 2018

2018-11-22 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
csr policies

Green Bond Management Statement

2015-09-28 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China
csr policies

Statement on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing

2011-01-05 00:00:00 | Agricultural Bank of China

Good moves

Year: