Banks| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2021-02-24 00:00:00
Protect the climate but finance Total?
2021-02-16 00:00:00
Oil and gas financiers are staring down the barrel at $1 trillion in losses: time to rein in support for new pipelines
2021-02-11 00:00:00
Beefing up risk: the exposure of JBS’ financiers to financial, regulatory and reputational risks
2021-01-25 00:00:00
Why should banks support EU mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence?
2020-09-24 12:53:20
Oscislowo open-pit coal mine cancelled
2020-09-08 13:07:41
Strengthened OECD guidance on responsible banking
2020-02-25 10:35:27
JPMorgan Chase Coal and Arctic Policy a step forward but fails to match its climate responsibility as the world’s #1 Fossil Bank
2020-02-18 17:27:23
Civil society groups welcome Royal Bank of Scotland preparing to exit fossil fuels
Connect
2021-02-01 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice
2020-11-30 00:00:00
Soft Commitments, Hard Lessons: an analysis of the Soft Commodities Compact
2020-11-24 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II
2020-11-18 00:00:00
Crude Risk: Risks to banks and investors from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline
2020-09-16 00:00:00
Principles for Paris-Aligned Financial Institutions: Climate Impact, Fossil Fuels and Deforestation
2020-08-17 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part I
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Home › Projects
Gateway Pacific coal export terminal United States
About
Financiers
Companies
Impacts
Brief history
Documents
News
Links
Updates

On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date

Send feedback on this profile
Download as PDF
By: BankTrack
Created before Nov 2016
Last update: 2015-11-01 14:53:10

Contact:

Amanda Starbuck, Senior Campaigner, Rainforest Action Network


Share this page:

Photo: -
Sectors Construction
Location
Website http://www.gatewaypacificterminal.com/

About Gateway Pacific coal export terminal

The Gateway Pacific Terminal, expected to cost USD 655 million, is a proposed coal export terminal at Cherry Point, near Bellingham, Washington. If completed, the terminal would have capacity to export 54 million tons of coal annually.

The project is an export-import facility on 1,092 acres in Whatcom County, Washington. This project is organized by SSA Marine, the Northwest Company and will include shipping, stevedoring, and warehousing facilities. The Gateway is expected to act as a portal for the export of various commodities, including coal, to Asian markets. It is located at Cherry Point, 17 miles south of the Canadian border with naturally deep water to accommodate the large transnational transporting ships.

Latest developments

Army Corps halts Gateway Pacific Terminal permitting process

2016-05-09 00:00:00

Crow Tribe and Cloud Peak Energy are joining SSA Marine

2015-08-13 00:00:00

Impacts

Social and human rights impacts

Trains delivering coal to the terminal in Cherry Point would travel through cities and towns and would cause traffic disruptions, public spending on safety improvements, lost property values, disruption of business activity and pollution from both coal dust and diesel locomotive exhaust. At full capacity, the terminal could draw as many as nine loaded trains per day through Bellingham, Washington - and they would head back through the city after unloading.

Environmental and climate impacts

Demand for coal in the United States is falling and US coal mining companies are responding by finding markets for coal overseas. Exporting US coal to foreign markets essentially exports global warming emissions instead of keeping carbon-intensive coal in the ground

Governance

Updates

Army Corps halts Gateway Pacific Terminal permitting process

2016-05-09 00:00:00

Justice prevailed for the Lummi Nation, the Indigenous community who are closest to the place where Peabody Coal and SSA Marine wanted to put North America's largest new coal export terminal. This place is called Xwe'chi'eXen, also known as Cherry Point, in the state of Washington. After five years of grassroots opposition to this project, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, one of the regulatory bodies with decision-making power, announced a decision to deny permits for the Gateway Pacific Terminals proposal at Cherry Point. This decision was made at the request of the Lummi Nation for the Army Corps to uphold the US Federal Government's treaty obligations to the Lummi Nation. This project's impacts would cause significant harm to their treaty protected fishing rights. The agency decision can be found here.

Crow Tribe and Cloud Peak Energy are joining SSA Marine

2015-08-13 00:00:00

SSA Marine, the Crow Tribe of Indians and Cloud Peak Energy Inc. (NYSE: CLD) announced that the Crow Tribe and Cloud Peak Energy are joining SSA Marine as partners in the Gateway Pacific Terminal, located in the Northwest corner of Washington state.

Goldman Sachs sells coal terminal investment

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Goldman Sachs Infrastructure Partners sold off its remaining equity investment in Carrix, the parent company of Pacific International Terminals and SSA Marine that are behind a colossal coal export terminal proposal near Bellingham, Washington. The move comes after coal companies and their proponents have tabled or dropped three out of six proposed coal export terminals in the Pacific Northwest in the last two years. Read more.

In the summer of 2013, Goldman Sachs’s research arm released a report titled “The Window for Thermal Coal Investment Is Closing,” forecasting that China’s demand for coal will peak within the next few years as the country’s growth rate slows and environmental regulations are increased. This means the high international coal prices that coal export proposals in the United States would be dependent on are extremely unlikely to materialize. With the bank’s own researchers casting doubt on the long-term viability of coal exports and the project facing sustained local opposition, Goldman Sachs may have wisely concluded that the time was right to get out of the business of coal exports.

Notification of state law violation

2011-08-08 00:00:00

The Washington Department of Ecology notified Pacific International Terminals Inc. that it violated state law at the site of the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal near Cherry Point in Whatcom County when it cleared land and built roads without a state stormwater permit for construction sites. Pacific international was directed to submit the required applications by Aug 15, 2011. The Department of Ecology is also currently investigating whether the work at the site violated wetland-protection requirements. Construction projects larger than one acre must have coverage under Ecology's Construction Stormwater General Permit. The road-building so far covers nine acres.

If SSA Marine's permits that were filed in February 2011 are approved by state and federal regulators, SSA Marine will next be required to obtain a lease from the Washington Department of Natural Resources.

Financiers

Related companies

Peabody Energy United States

SSA Marine United States

News

| |
Type:
Year:
blog
external news
our news

U.S. Denies Permit for Coal Terminal in Washington State

2016-05-09 | The New York Times
blog
external news
our news

Oregon Says Coal Export Project Will Need To Lease More Land

2014-03-20 | Daily Astorian
blog
external news
our news

Goldman Sachs pulls coal investment as skies darken for US coal exports

2014-01-10 | Greenpeace Energy Desk
blog
external news
our news

Goldman Sachs sacks coal terminal investment

Coal sector loosing appeal to Wall Street investors
2014-01-07 | San Fransisco | Rainforest Action Network
blog
external news
our news

Coal exporter disturbed Native American archaeological site near Bellingham

2013-11-25 | Portland Tribune
blog
external news
our news

Bad news for Big Coal in Whatcom County

2013-11-05 | Seatle Pi
blog
external news
our news

Peabody Energy, Gateway Pacific, and the Asian Coal Bubble

2013-10-22 | Sightline Institute
blog
external news
our news

King Coal's Last Stand

2013-10-04 | Vice
blog
external news
our news

Gateway Pacific Terminal site work lacked state permit

2011-08-05 | ECY
blog
external news
our news

Coal export madness spreading to Oregon

2011-06-21 | United States | Scott Parkin, RAN
blog
external news
our news

Rail terminal in Bellingham could mean more coal, freight trains through county

2011-05-20 | United States | Heraldnet
blog
external news
our news

Coalition reacts to planned mega-coal export operation at Cherry Point

Groups raise major concerns about impact on public health, environment, and economy
2011-03-04 | United States | Washington Environmental Council
blog
external news
our news

Peabody's plans heighten environmental opposition to Washington coal port

2011-03-02 | Washington | Platts
blog
external news
our news

Gateway Pacific Terminal begins environmental review process

2011-03-01 | United States | BBJ Today

Documents

Type:
Year:
ngo documents
2011-11-15 00:00:00

Bank of America: Risking Public Health and the Climate

2011-11-15 00:00:00 | Rainforest Action Network
company documents
2011-04-12 00:00:00

Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) Form

2011-04-12 00:00:00 | Pacific International Terminals, Inc.

Links

Gateway Pacific Terminal

Project website
http://www.gatewaypacificterminal.com/

Brief history

The environmental review process for the Gateway Pacific Terminal began on February 28, 2011 when SSA Marine applied for state and federal permits for the USD 500 million terminal. If approved, the terminal would begin construction in early 2013 and operations in 2015.

On March 1, 2011, SSA Marine announced it had entered into an agreement with Peabody Energy to export up to 24 million metric tons of coal per year through the Gateway Pacific Terminal. The development of this terminal would allow Peabody Energy to export coal mined in Montana and Wyoming's Powder River Basin to Asian markets.

Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted