BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Dodgy Deals ›
Dodgy Deal
Amasra coal mine and power plantTurkey

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

climate@banktrack.org

Last update: 2020-11-30 00:00:00
Panorama of the ancient town of Amasra, Bartin province, Turkey. Photo: CC-BY-SA-3.0 by Nevit Dilmen

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

climate@banktrack.org

Last update: 2020-11-30 00:00:00
Why this profile?

Why this profile?

The Amasra coal mine and power plant project is planned on the Black Sea coast where the majority of local residents' economic activity is based on small-scale farming and fishing. At the same time, hundreds of hectares of forest land belonging to the Küre Mountains National Park, one of 9 conservation hotspots in Turkey, will be allocated for the coal power plant project.

What must happen

The project's impacts on the local ecology, economy and community are expected to be severe and long-lasting. They include the clearing of forests, impacts on local livelihoods based on small-scale farming and fishing, and the coal plant’s contribution to climate change. Banks and financial institutions should avoid financing the coal power plant and the mine. The Turkish authorities should reject the Environmental Impact Assessment of the coal power plant project.

About
Sectors Coal Mining , Coal Electric Power Generation
Location
Status
Planning
Design
Agreement
Construction
Operation
Closure
Decommission
Website https://www.hemaenerji.com/amasra-tas-komuru-projesi/proje-hakkinda

The Amasra coal mine and power plant is an energy project on the Black Sea coast next to the town of Amasra in Turkey's Bartın province. The power plant is a proposed 1,320 MW 'ultra-supercritical' coal plant project, consisting of two units of 660 MW each that would use hard coal (anthracite) as a feedstock. It is planned by Hema Enerji, a subsidiary of Turkey’s Hattat Holdings Energy Group.

The project plans have changed several times since the initial agreement in 2005 because of problems with attracting financiers and partners, difficulties in aligning the project with environmental regulations and the huge opposition of local movements. Over the last 13 years, local communities in Amasra and beyond have fought against the coal power plant.

According to plans from the project sponsor, the nearby Amasra B coal mine should extract the coal required to fuel the coal plant. Hema has rented the 56 million tonnes of hard coal reserves from the state for 20 years for mining, targeting the extraction of 10 million tonnes per year, but has not extracted any coal from the mine since 2005. The expansion of Tarlaağzı harbour is included in the coal plant project’s EIA, which implies that the company intends to import coal for the power plant.

Impacts

Social and human rights impacts

Community impacts

According to the Western Black Sea Development Agency, the coal power plant threatens the local economy. Small-scale farming, fishing and tourism are major sources of income in the surrounding villages of Gömü, Tarlaağzı and Amasra.

Pollution from the plant

Pollution due to mining and the power plant would increase emissions of carcinogenic particles and, hence, threaten the health and livelihoods of locals. Amasra’s geographical location makes it subject to an inversion effect, a meteorological deviation that captures emitted particles and fine dust and allows them to settle on the town of Amasra. As Professor Erdoğan Atmış has explained, "Air cannot rise in Amasra due to the temperature difference between land and sea surfaces. The fog layer descends and stays suspended in the air if there is a mountain. If you emit carbon dioxide or sulphur in a place like this, it will mix into the atmosphere, come down and settle. This is a serious, lethal danger." The plant emissions would further affect small-scale farming, e.g. strawberry farming and hazelnut harvesting. Ash and toxic elements will settle on fields and contaminate the plants.

Impact on fish stocks

The coal plant's cooling water would be taken from the same source where drinking water for the local villages is withdrawn. Bartın Municipality, which is responsible for the distribution of drinking water, has won a court case against the company on the grounds of ineligibility to use the same water source for cooling the plant. The heated water from the coal plant's turbines would then be expelled into the Black Sea where it would endanger aquatic life. This inflow of heated water from the power plant would affect local fish stocks and is thus raising the fears of local fishermen whose income depends on fishing. Moreover, the fishermen use the small fishing port in Tarlaağzı which faces restructuring in order to give way to the planned harbour. In the project EIA, Hema admits that "the water quality of the port is likely to be affected by the construction activities and ongoing activities during the hard coal mine project" (EIA, page 22).

Impacts on tourism

The increasing importance of tourism for the region would be undermined by the coal plant. Beaches would have to be destroyed to make way for the harbour. The town of Amasra is temporarily on the UNESCO World Heritage list because parts of the ancient town date back to the Byzantine age. It is visited by 250,000 people every year. Turkey's Tourism Strategy 2023 has proposed the region around the plant to become an eco-tourism region and, in the 2007-13 Tourism Action Plan, the region was placed in the "Ecotourism Focused Development Zone".

The operations of the plant, the mine, the port and associated transportation would also involve noise pollution that could have negative impacts on the health of locals as well as Amasra's appeal as a tourist location. As trucks would have to continue transportation throughout the night, "the noise levels are expected to exceed both national and IFC standards" (EIA, page 23).

Further impacts

Until the port starts to operate, the EIA states that coal would be transported by lorries via main roads which pass small villages and schools. These may be affected by the pollution resulting from such transportation.

Most parts of the required areas have already been purchased by Hema, but 11 parcels of land remain to be expropriated. Further resettlements of local villages will result from the plant's construction.

While the investors are placing emphasis on the potential economic benefits which could accrue from the project, such as the standard implied 'benefit' of an increase in job opportunities for locals, the investors' proposed actions suggest something different: the project is based primarily on foreign supplies of technology, capital, employees, partners and even imported coal. The overwhelming negative consequences for the local economy which the plant would involve can not be compensated for or offest by any 'short-term' benefits it may (or may not) bring.

Nine mine workers have died underground during the first 12 years of the mining project.

Agriculture, fishing and tourism - the main economic activities for local communities - will be heavily impacted. 

The rights of local inhabitants to a healthy environment are threatened with more than 40,000 trees already cut for the passing electricity circuit, and more will be cut to realise the construction.

Amasra, as is the case for the rest of the Black Sea coast in Turkey, is prone to floods. Contributing to the warming of the climate will exacerbate these risks for local people.


Environmental and climate impacts

Forest impacts

To make room for the power plant project (including the mine, industrial facilities and power lines), large areas of forest land would have to be felled. The land to be allocated for the power plant alone would require 380 hectares of natural forest to be cleared, next to the Küre Mountains national park. Other associated facilities would require additional hundreds of hectares of forest land to be cleared.

Hurriyet Daily News reported in 2014 that most sections of the transmission line, which would connect the plant to the national grid, would pass through forest ecosystems. The authorities have already begun cutting down trees, thereby damaging sensitive parts of the ecosystem.

Air impacts

Coal power plants emit large amounts of greenhouse gases which cause climate change. Furthermore, they also emit gases and fine dust that can penetrate the lungs and cause respiratory diseases. To date, the project sponsor has not disclosed an appropriate desulphurisation system to filter out nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and dioxide, and fine dust and ash. Without these filters, toxic particles would fall around the plant and increase health issues for local residents.

Water impacts

Cooling water for the plant would be extracted from the same source where drinking water for local villages comes from. Bartın Municipality has won a court case against the company on the grounds of ineligibility to use the same source for the cooling of the plant, as Bartın Municipality is in charge of distributing drinking water from the water source.

Waste concerns

The project EIA report is not clear about what will be done with the coal launder facility’s dangerous waste. The previously established practice of dumping waste from coal facilities in ash dams in the middle of forests in the Aegean region of Turkey gives major cause for concern regarding the proposed Amasra project and its intended approach to coal ash disposal.


Other impacts

Legal forms of intervention and opposition by local residents against the evaluation of the EIA are being ignored, including the 42,000 collected signatures from the region’s inhabitants opposing the project.

Financiers

In March 2010, it was announced that the total investment would amount to EUR 2 billion. In 2013, a contract of USD 2.4 billion was signed between Turkish Hattat Holding and China-based Harbin Electric International to build a coal-based power plant in northwestern Turkey.

There was some interest from Credit Suisse in early 2017, as communicated to local groups, but no such interest has been confirmed.

Companies

Project sponsor

HEMA Enerji

Turkey
Website
No companies

Other companies

Datong Coal Mine Group

China
Website
Datong Coal Mine is responsible for drilling wells.

Harbin Electric

China
Website
In 2013, Chinese Harbin Electric International (HEI) entered a contract worth $2.4 billion for the construction of the power plant. As HEI is a state-owned company, the 'Guidelines for Environmental Protection in Foreign Investment and Co-operation' issued by the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China apply to this project, as to which low-carbon and environment-friendly technology shall mark foreign investments.

Hattat Holding

Turkey
Website

SRK Consulting

- international -
Website
In coordination with SRK, in 2009 Hema analysed the geographical conditions and the drafted bankable feasibility report showed potential reserves of 265 million tonnes.
No companies
News
BankTrack
Partners
Blog
External
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Turkish coal-fired plant expansion stalls, with 70 GW shelved since 2009

2019-08-23 | Platts
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Turkey will offer 500 coal mines to investors

2019-05-27 | Ahvalnews.com
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Amasra thermal power plant process restarts with Public Participation Meeting

2019-05-08 | Medyascope
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Another setback for coal industry globally: Hema Power Plant rejected by the Supreme Administrative Court in Amasra, Bartin – Turkey

2019-02-22 | 350.org
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

It’s been 12 years, 180 trees, and Amasra will not yield

2017-12-28 | 350.org
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Credit Suisse and UBS finally move on coal – but they’re still in climate cloud cuckoo land

2017-04-25 | Yann Louvel – BankTrack
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Amasra: Çeşm-i Cihan, Çeşm-i Termik olmasın

2017-02-27 | 350 Turkey
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

‘Greenpeace is always creating trouble in the Black Sea’

2016-11-12 | hurriyetdailynews
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Bartın Platformu, Amasra’da Termik Santral Projesine Karşı Dava Açtı

2016-11-08 | 140 Journos
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Is it too late to stop Turkey's coal rush?

2015-08-06 | The Guardian
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Turkey’s ordeal with trees: Top 10 mass deforestation sites

2014-12-02 | hurriyetdailynews
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

43,000 trees set to be felled near Black Sea port for new coal plant

2014-11-24 | hurriyetdailynews
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Activists collect over 40,000 signatures against construction of coal plant in Black Sea port

2014-06-25 | hurriyetdailynews
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Amasra Residents Protest Coal on Land, Sea

2014-06-06 | bianet.org
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Erdogan's Turkey embarks on massive 'dash for coal'

2013-11-05 | The Ecologist
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Turkish firm to build coal-fired power plant

2013-06-05 | Hurriyet
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Turkish and Chinese companies ink USD 2.4 billion coal-based power plant deal

2013-05-15 | Invest.gov
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Turkey’s Hema signs deal to build coal-fired plant

2012-02-23 | Argus Media
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Public OutCry in District of Amasra of Bartin Province on Black Sea coast of Turkey

2010-10-25
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Deputy general manager of Datong Coal Mine Group visits AMASRA Coal Mine

2010-06-29 | DT Coalmine
Resources
Documents
Videos
Links
2016-04-30 00:00:00

Coal report - Turkey's coal policies related to climate change, economy and health

Other document
2016-04-30 00:00:00 | Istanbul Policy Center
2018-12-27 00:00:00

Turkey’s 21st Century Coal Rush

Other document
2018-12-27 00:00:00 | Global Business Reports
2014-03-15 00:00:00

Turkish energy market and coal investments

NGO document
2014-03-15 00:00:00 | Greenpeace
2014-12-31 00:00:00

Silent Killers : Why Turkey Must Replace Coal Power Projects With Green Energy

NGO document
2014-12-31 00:00:00 | Greenpeace

Local people blocking a public participation meeting

2019-09-03 11:03:54

Summary of different court cases and legal history (Turkish)

Amasra’da kömürlü termik santrale yer yok!

Amasra Power Station on SourceWatch

Amasra Mine on Sourcewatch

Graph of coal plants in Turkey

Case studies: Amasra coal power plant, Turkey

Turkey and coal

Overview of Turkey and coal, by Global Energy Monitor.

Updates

2020

2020-06-18 00:00:00 | Council of State cancels plan change

In June 2020 the Council of State canceled the approval for Environmental Plan Change for the HEMA coal power plant project. The Environmental plan was changed after the EIA approval for the plant. With the change in the environmental plan, the area coal plant was planned to build is moved to an area which is a forest area in the EIA report. This plan change is canceled by the Council of State. (Birgun.net).

2019

2019-08-20 00:00:00 | Cancellation of EIA decision for HEMA coal preparation plant

Following the rejection of the HEMA coal power plant project in February (see below), the Zonguldak Administrative Court has overturned an 'EIA positive' decision for the coal preparation plant at the facility. This follows an appeal from the Bartın Platform. See news update (in Turkish).

2019-05-07 00:00:00 | New EIA application from HEMA

Hattat Energy and Mining Company (HEMA) once again applied for an EIA for the cumulative project, including all the parts that had different EIAs and the port. The Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urban Planning announced a public participation meeting for May 10, 2019. Around 200 local people prevented the meeting from taking place with non-violent protests. 

2019-02-22 00:00:00 | Hema Power Plant rejected by the Supreme Administrative Court in Amasra, Bartin

The Supreme Administrative Court of Amasra, Bartin in Turkey has decided to overturn the decision of the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, and to reject the construction of the Hema Thermal Power Plant. The project was owned by the Turkish company Hattat Holding and was supposed to be built in the region of Amasra, Bartin – a city that figures in the list of UNESCO’s Temporary World Heritage (350.org).

2018

2018-04-16 00:00:00 | Legal hearing of Bartın Platformu's lawsuit against the project

Legal hearing of Bartın Platformu's lawsuit against the project, the one with the record number of pleads (2,019 individuals). 

2018-03-10 00:00:00 | 148 mine workers are fired

148 mine workers were fired by the mining subcontractor of Hema, the workers started resistance action outside the company premises. The subcontractor company claimed that Hema (Hattat Holding) hadn't paid their fees so they had to fire the workers; in response, Hema claimed that their contract was already over and had nothing to do with their debt. Hema also said that the new contracting company should be able to accommodate these workers. However, the workers told Bartın Platformu that they were still unable to extract any coal from the gallery, and that they have been directly paid by Hema in the last couple of months, rather than the subcontractor. Moreover, following the agreement between Hattat and Eren Holdings signed in 2017, the mining activities in Amasra should have been accelerated now as the plan on paper was to extract local hard coal to transport to Eren's Zonguldak power plants to be burned, whereas now all miners are fired and Hema still could not manage to extract even 1 ton of coal which is absurd, according to Bartın Platformu. News in Turkish: Gazete Duvar, Bartin info.   

2017

2017-12-26 00:00:00 | Villagers wake up to their olive trees being cut

Hema's employees clear fell olive groves, the company was fined for their violation of the special regulation on olive groves, and the 180 olive trees they cut. The local communities resisted on the ground since the moment they heard about the clearfelling. More details: 350.org/amasra.

2017-11-06 00:00:00 | Sponsors sign a protocol to use local coal instead of imported coal

Hattat and Eren Holding companies signed a protocol with the presence of the Minister of Energy, Berat Albayrak. Both Eren and Hattat are among the companies on coal expansion course listed by urgewald in the top 120 coal plant developers of the Global Coal Exit List. Acccording to the protocol, Eren Holding's Zonguldak power plants which currently operate on imported hard coal, will use the local hard coal extracted by Hattat Holding (Hema) in Amasra. This fits in with Turkey's political push towards local coal and away from imported coal, due to the country's external debt and current account deficit. The problem raised by Bartın Platformu, is that Hema has been trying to extract coal for the last 12 years, and they haven't managed to do so despite the existence of their galleries; so it remains unclear how it will now supply 7 mn tons of coal/year to Zonguldak. Moreover, there's no means of transportation between Amasra and Zonguldak as such. In parallel, the new subsidy schemes for local coal in Turkey gives incentives to the coal sector to use local coal, in spite of the fact that there's no transparent monitoring system in place to report whether a plant burns local or imported coal. News pieces in Turkish and English: Daily Sabah ; Argus Media ; Bartin Halk Gazetesi ; Hurriyet ; CAN Europe (see the first article in the newsletter on the latest capacity mechanisms scheme).

Send feedback on this profile
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted