BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
20 years of BankTrack – Our history
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-09-18 00:00:00
New report and blog: Barclays' bond with Adani
2023-08-23 00:00:00
Decarbonization: steel not making the cut
2023-07-27 00:00:00
Two months ago 62 organizations and 3 Goldman Environmental Prize winners wrote an Open Letter to the TNFD: No one responded
2023-07-13 00:00:00
The Sustainable Steel Principles: One step forward when leaps are needed
2023-09-15 17:34:10
The number of major banks refusing to support EACOP reaches 24
2023-07-31 14:30:01
Equator Principles recognise projects’ risk to climate for the first time
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
Connect
2023-09-18 00:00:00
Barclays' bond with Adani
2023-06-26 00:00:00
How should financiers align with the Global Biodiversity Framework? Five Key Principles
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
End Coal Finance
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Banks and steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack 20 years of BankTrack – Our history Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › BankTrack blog ›
BankTrack News

Rampal financing still in the balance as double standards mount

2016-12-21
By: Greig Aitken – BankTrack
Contact:

Greig Aitken, BankTrack Coal campaigner

2016-12-21
By: Greig Aitken – BankTrack
Contact:

Greig Aitken, BankTrack Coal campaigner

As 2016 draws to a close, the controversial Rampal coal plant in Bangladesh remains unfinanced. To date there has been no financial closure on a $1.6 billion credit from India Ex-Im, India’s export credit agency. The delayed investment has been looming for some time now for a project widely regarded as being foisted by India on its neighbour – and, in particular, on the world renowned Sundarbans mangrove forest and its fragile ecosystems.

Rampal is being challenged and severely tested on various fronts. Following a UNESCO report in October detailing the irreversible damage to the waterways, inhabitants, wildlife and rich biodiversity of the Sundarbans which the project would deliver if realised, there has been no indication that the Bangladeshi government or companies involved are willing to back down in the face of the unequivocal UNESCO recommendation that the proposed coal plant should be ‘cancelled and relocated’. Not surprisingly, high level lobbying aimed at breaking UNESCO’s resolve on the Sundarbans is said to be well under way.

Bangladeshis, meanwhile, took to the streets at the end of November, with the latest anti-Rampal protest attracting thousands of people to the capital Dhaka. Country-wide resistance to the coal plant is growing, and an escalation of these protests is planned for early in the new year.   

While the Bangladeshi government continues to stick to its line that there is no alternative to Rampal’s coal-fired power supply, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) also pitched in to the debate in November with the publication of a 64 page report which provides just such an alternative scenario: a cheaper, cleaner and faster-to-implement alternative electricity plan for Bangladesh based on the country’s huge energy efficiency and solar energy potential. 

According to Tim Buckley, IEEFA’s director of Energy Finance Studies for Australasia, a stronger focus on Bangladesh’s already flourishing solar home system program would “rapidly eradicate energy poverty and facilitate health and education improvements where they are most needed in rural Bangladesh.”

India’s double standards…

Yet it has long been clear that Indian coal interests are giving the Bangladeshi government no alternative but to stick to this ‘no alternative’ position. This has become all the more galling following the encouraging signals contained in last week’s widely reported draft National Electricity Plan from the Indian government which anticipates no need for new coal plants in India up to 2027, other than those already under construction. A big, 100 gigawatt doubling of India’s clean energy capacity is now being viewed in New Delhi as the way to go.

Will Bangladeshis, then, just have to swallow India’s coal double standards and all the threats that go with them, including the delivery of four million tonnes of coal every year via some highly precarious waterways? Recall that Rampal, a joint venture involving India’s state-owned National Thermal Power Corporation and sited only 14 kilometres from the Sundarbans reserve forest, would not be doable in India as a result of its 1972 Wildlife Protection Act which rules out such projects within a 15 kilometre exclusion zone around national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserve forests. 

Much still depends on that $1.6 billion India Ex-Im financing, some of which will have to be raised on the bond markets. As BankTrack and more than 50 organisations recently pointed out to a clutch of western banks with a history of assisting India Ex-Im with its bond issues, any further such bond arranging will be tantamount to ‘enabling’ Rampal.

It’s clear that banks involved in bond arranging can have influence over how the money is spent. For example, India Ex-Im itself, in an October 2016 article in Responsible Investor (behind paywall), claimed the projects to be financed by its first ‘green bond’ issue “were identified based on the advice of the joint lead managers” – i.e. banks. In this case the lead managers were Bank of America Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan Chase, two of the banks we have just warned about the serious reputational risk that will result from further bond issue involvement with India Ex-Im.

Green bonds, intended to help finance pro-environment projects, may require more policing and ‘advice’ than standard bonds, but banks which involve themselves in these capital-raising processes for clients would do well at all times to bring their influence to bear on clients in order to ensure that the financing of egregious projects does not result from capital raising which they facilitate for a healthy fee. And UNESCO has judged – in strong terms – that Rampal will be an egregious project.

…now being matched by big bank double standards?

Another of the banks we have addressed is Standard Chartered. Following an anonymous tip-off, Standard Chartered has confirmed to us that it has already opted to support Rampal by insuring one of the project’s construction companies via a $45 million ‘performance guarantee’.

This is a highly negligent undertaking for a bank which is supposed to abide by its own risk management declarations and restrict the provision of financial services to clients in the fossil fuel power generation sector who would have a significant impact on UNESCO World Heritage sites or protected wetlands (such as the Sundarbans).

The bank has said it “will not provide further financial facilities related to Rampal”, but it is unclear if this extends to assisting Ex-Im India with bond issues. Standard Chartered and other potential supporters of Ex-Im bonds are now on notice, and we hope they can make their influence felt on the Indian institution: UNESCO’s Rampal warning is for real. If things don’t turn out as planned on Rampal (and here’s hoping they don’t), Standard Chartered may have to pay out on that performance guarantee. And that could well be a hit worth taking, given what’s at stake in the Sundarbans – including bank reputations.

Banks

Bank of America

United States
Active

Barclays

United Kingdom
Active

Citi

United States
Active

JPMorgan Chase

United States
Active

Standard Chartered

United Kingdom
Active
Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Rampal coal power plant

Bangladesh
Project
On record
Coal Electric Power Generation

Rampal coal power plant

Bangladesh
There are no active company profiles for this item now.

National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC)

India
Company
on record
Coal Electric Power Generation | Coal Mining | Hydroelectric Power Generation | Wind Electric Power Generation

National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC)

India
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA End Coal Finance Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Banks and steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack 20 years of BankTrack – Our history Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2023 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted