Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
Crédit Agricole: dodgy coal deals reveal policy breach
In 2019, Crédit Agricole became the first major bank in the world to exclude coal developers and to request an exit plan from the sector from its coal clients. But three years later, new financial data reveals that the bank has failed to properly enforce its policy.
Start
Banks
Dodgy Deals

By: Reclaim Finance
2022-02-15

Share this page:

Photo: Reclaim Finance
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Despite its commitments, Crédit Agricole has continued to finance companies, such as Glencore and Marubeni, despite their coal mines and coal power plant developments around the world. This analysis reveals the need for the French government and regulators to monitor the concrete application of the policies adopted by the financial institutions, and apply sanctions in case of policy breaches.

Crédit Agricole, a pioneer bank on coal

In June 2019, Crédit Agricole became the first international bank to adopt a climate strategy worthy of the name, with pioneering restrictions on the coal industry. Crédit Agricole was the first major financial institution to address coal expansion, as well as require its clients to plan for a full coal phase out.

"The Group also undertakes to stop working with corporations currently developing or planning to develop new thermal coal capacities along the entire value chain (mining, production, utilities, and transport infrastructures)." Press release, June 13th, 2019 (in French).

NGOs across the world welcomed this policy, which has since become best practice at international level. But 2022 is time for a reality check: two years after the announcement of this policy, an in-depth scrutiny of Crédit Agricole transactions (1) shows that several of them are clearly in violation of the policy: Crédit Agricole has recently funded several companies which do not have a coal exit plan in line with the bank’s criteria and are still developing new coal plans.

What did Crédit Agricole commit to exactly?

A year after announcing its climate strategy, Crédit Agricole adopted sectoral coal policies detailing new restrictions by its corporate and investment banking activity in three sub-sectors: mining, power, and transport infrastructure. The policies detailed the phased implementation of the restrictions and provided for a “transitional phased approach over the period 2020-2021” for coal developers already in the bank’s portfolio:

  • starting in 2020, a close monitoring and analysis of each client’s direction of travel. If the analysis didn’t give enough evidence, the company was placed on a watchlist;
  • from 2021 onwards, the clients were all explicitly requested to adopt a coal phase-out plan, including the end of any further coal developments.

“For the continuation of financial services from 2021, the Bank expects its clients to develop and communicate to it an phasing out plan in line with the timetable recommended by climate science (2030 for EU and OECD countries and 2040 for the rest of the world), including a commitment not to develop new projects.”(Crédit Agricole sector policy, March 2020).

How did Crédit Agricole breach its coal policy

Our analysis reveals that in 2021, Crédit Agricole financially supported a number of coal developers, in clear violation of the criteria set out in its policies. For instance:

  • Glencore: Glencore still plans an expansion of 45 million tonnes of coal per annum in 9 mines in Australia and South Africa, making it the 9th largest coal mine developer in the world. Despite this, Crédit Agricole participated in February 2021 in a bond issue of over €1 billion and in March 2021 a general loan of over US$ 4.5 billion to the Swiss mining giant. Furthermore, Glencore, a company that claims to be on a transition path, does not plan to close its coal mines ahead of their due closure date, and plans to continue producing coal until after 2050.
  • Marubeni: Marubeni is still involved in the construction of 3 new coal-fired power plants, Nghi Son 2 in Vietnam, Cirebon 2 in Indonesia and Tokuyama East (TKE3) in Japan, for a total of 2,620 MW. Despite these well-known plans, Crédit Agricole has contributed in February 2021 to a loan of more than US$ 500 million to the Japanese giant. Ironically, Crédit Agricole withdrew from direct financing of the Cirebon 2 plant at the beginning of 2017, but continues to indirectly finance Marubeni four years later. If the Japanese trading house has committed to phasing out coal by 2050, this exit is 10 to 20 years too late compared with what climate science and Crédit Agricole require.
  • Itochu: the Japanese coal company is involved in the highly controversial 2,000 MW coal-fired power plant project in Batang, Indonesia. Nevertheless, Crédit Agricole contributed a general loan of US$ 500 million to Itochu in June 2021. Itochu has announced its exit from the coal sector by 2024 but the commitment does not include coal power plants, only coal mines. To make things worse, Itochu is only planning to sell its coal mine assets, instead of closing them.
  • En+/Rusal: This Russian aluminum producer is planning to increase coal production by 35 million tons per annum, in five coal mines in Russia. Yet, Crédit Agricole participated in a general loan of US$ 200 million in January 2021 (2).

When asked to comment on these problematic transactions, the bank told Reclaim Finance that it considered them in line with its policy and that it was “in constant dialogue with these customers to explain Crédit Agricole’s expectations and regularly discuss their climate strategy”. It indicates that the transitional phase for coal developers ended on December 31st, 2021, and therefore that its explicit request to companies to adopt an exit plan from the sector including the cessation of development “from 2021” “for the continuation of financial services” had to be understood… “from 2022”!

However, the fact that all these companies have in no way given up on these coal sector development projects, and that their exit strategy is still far from the imperatives dictated by climate science and by the bank’s own policy, should have been enough to place them in 2020 on the bank’s watchlist, “limiting the financial services made available to them to the financing of, and investment in, energy transition”. Given this did not happen, Reclaim Finance has therefore decided to revise the rating of Crédit Agricole CIB’s policy in the Coal Policy Tool. Crédit Agricole lost several points and its ‘star’ which qualified its coal policy as ‘robust’.

10672
220215_creditagricole_visual_coal_policy_tool.png
center
This table presents the coal scores of Crédit Agricole based on five criteria of the Coal Policy Tool..
Photo: Reclaim Finance

The urgent need for compliance and sanction mechanisms

This first scrutiny exercise raises a much broader and deeper issue: that of compliance mechanisms for all the financial institutions who have voluntarily adopted coal policies (3). Reclaim Finance will monitor the application of the coal policies of the other major French and then international financial players in the coming months. Whether Crédit Agricole’s violations are unique or just the tip of the iceberg, they underscore the need for regulation and sanction. In 2018, French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire announced at Climate Finance Day 2018 that he would force banks to exit coal if they did not actually do so.

“In the coming weeks, therefore, I will bring together banks, insurers and asset managers to make new commitments to definitively stop financing the activities most harmful to global warming, in particular coal. . The commitments must be precise, the commitments must be monitored and if ever these commitments, on a voluntary basis, defined together, are not respected, they will be made binding," Bruno Le Maire, Climate Finance Day 2018.

Three years later, it has become very clear that it is dangerous to rely solely on financial players’ good faith to adapt their policies and align with the international objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Reclaim Finance calls on the French government and presidential candidates to commit to regulating the practices of financial actors. In particular, the State must prohibit the financing of certain activities, ensure verification of the application of voluntary policies and sanction policy breaches.

Notes:

  1. Each year, Reclaim Finance and its partners collect extensive data on all financial transactions to companies listed on the Global Coal Exit List. Given that Crédit Agricole adopted its strategy in 2019 and applied its policy in March 2020, it is now possible to assess the implementation of criteria announced by the group and to ensure whether the bank has complied, breached, or played with the gray areas of the policy. Only the analysis of Crédit Agricole CIB’s transactions has been carried out so far, but Reclaim Finance intends to extend this approach to other financial players as their policies come into effect.
  2. In addition, En+ also plans new coal-fired power plants, but these will supply the group directly. According to Crédit Agricole, this falls under a special clause of the bank’s policy which provides for the analysis of this type of company “in a second stage”, without further details . No such clause exists for coal mine developers, however, and the January 2021 transaction therefore appears to be a violation.
  3. Increasingly, financial players are adopting complex policies, with gray areas that give room for interpretation and therefore arbitrariness, when they are not more simply riddled with exceptions.

From www.Reclaimfinance.org

Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related banks

Crédit Agricole France

active
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related Dodgy Deals

Companies

There are no companies active for this item now.
on record

En+ Group Russian Federation

Coal Electric Power Generation | Hydroelectric Power Generation
on record

Glencore Switzerland

Coal Mining
on record

Marubeni Japan

Coal Electric Power Generation | Mining | Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Mills
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted