Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Right-wing attack on sustainable finance is the latest form of climate denial
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
New report: Despite ‘net zero’ rhetoric, world’s biggest banks continued to pour billions into fossil fuel expansion in 2021
Annual Banking on Climate Chaos report follows the money and details massive bank support for the world’s worst climate-destroying corporations
Start
Banks

By: BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club & Urgewald
2022-03-30
San Francisco, Bemidji, Nijmegen, Oakland, Paris, Sassenberg, Washington DC

Contact:

Maaike Beenes, Campaign lead Banks and Climate at BankTrack

Laurel Sutherlin, Senior Communications Strategist at Rainforest Action Network


Share this page:

Banking on Climate Chaos 2022 - flag and report cover. Photo: Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
Go to:
Start
Related Banks

Released today, the 13th annual Banking on Climate Chaos report, the most comprehensive global analysis on fossil fuel banking to date, underscores the stark disparity between public climate commitments being made by the world’s largest banks, versus the reality of their largely business-as-usual financing to the fossil fuel industry.

The report documents that in the six years since the Paris Agreement was adopted, the world’s 60 largest private banks financed fossil fuels with US$ 4.6 trillion, with US$ 742 billion in 2021 alone. 2021 fossil fuel financing numbers remained above 2016 levels, when the Paris Agreement came into force. Of particular significance is the revelation that the 60 banks profiled in the report funneled US$ 185.5 billion just last year into the 100 companies doing the most to expand the fossil fuel sector.

Banking on Climate Chaos was authored by Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club, and Urgewald, and is endorsed by 500 organizations from 49 countries around the world.

The report shows that overall fossil fuel financing remains dominated by four U.S. banks, with JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America together accounting for one quarter of all fossil fuel financing identified over the last six years. JPMorgan Chase remains the world’s worst funder of climate chaos, while JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Mizuho, MUFG, and all five Canadian banks were among those that increased their fossil financing from 2020 to 2021. Barclays continues the be the largest European bank financier of the fossil fuel industry, followed by BNP Paribas and HSBC.

As global oil and gas markets are rocked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the data reveal JPMorgan Chase to be the biggest banker covered in this report for Russian state energy giant Gazprom, both in terms of 2016-2021 totals and when looking only at last year. JPMorgan Chase provided Gazprom with US$ 1.1 billion in fossil fuel financing in 2021.

The report includes a timeline that lays out how banks that joined the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA, part of the Global Financial Alliance for Net Zero, GFANZ) last year simultaneously financed some of the most egregious oil and gas expansion companies, potentially helping to lock the planet into decades of climate-warming emissions. Immediately following the April 2021 launch of the NZBA, many signatory and soon-to-be-signatory banks engaged in huge transactions completely counter to achieving “net zero,” including: May 2021: US$ 10 billion to Saudi Aramco (Citi, JPMorgan Chase), US$ 1.5 billion to Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. (Citi); June 2021: US$ 12.5 billion to QatarEnergy (Citi, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs); August 2021: US$ 10 billion to ExxonMobil (Citi, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley). Out of the 44 banks in this report currently committed to net-zero financed emissions by 2050, 28 still don’t have a meaningful no-expansion policy for any part of the fossil fuel industry.

The world’s leading climate scientists have concluded that existing reserves of fossil fuels contain more than enough carbon pollution to break our remaining ‘carbon budget’ and thrust the world past 2 degrees Celsius of warming — let alone the 1.5 degree aspirations of the Paris Agreement — and the climate catastrophe that entails.

The new Global Oil and Gas Exit List exposes the fact that upstream oil and gas expansion is remarkably concentrated: the top 20 companies are responsible for more than half of fossil fuel development and exploration. Today’s report shows that bank support for those companies is also remarkably concentrated: the top 10 bankers of those top 20 companies are responsible for 63% of the companies’ big-bank financing since Paris. Each of those top ten bankers is formally committed to net zero by 2050: JPMorgan Chase, Citi, Bank of America, BNP Paribas, HSBC, Barclays, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Crédit Agricole, Société Générale.

Fossil fuel sector trends

Alarmingly, tar sands saw a 51% increase in financing from 2020-2021 to US$ 23.3 billion, with the biggest jump coming from Canadian banks RBC and TD, with JPMorgan Chase still a major player. Fracking saw US$ 62.1 billion in financing last year, dominated by North American banks with Wells Fargo at the top. JPMorgan Chase, SMBC Group, and Intesa Sanpaolo were the top bankers of Arctic oil and gas last year, with $8.2 billion in funding to the sector in 2021. Morgan Stanley, RBC, and Goldman Sachs were 2021’s worst bankers of LNG, a sector that is looking to banks to help push through a slate of enormous infrastructure projects. Big banks funneled US$ 52.9 billion into offshore oil and gas last year, with U.S. banks Citi and JPMorgan Chase providing the most in 2021. Coal mining financing is led by the Chinese banks, with China Everbright Bank and China CITIC Bank as the worst in 2021. Big banks overall provided $17.4 billion to the sector last year.

In the next two months, all six Wall Street banks are expected to face shareholder resolutions calling on them to stop financing fossil fuel expansion and otherwise truly align their business practices with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

 

BOCC co-author quotes

Maaike Beenes, Campaign Lead Banks and Climate at BankTrack:

"Climate science has made it inescapably clear that there can be no expansion of fossil fuels if we are to limit global warming to 1.5˚C. But banks have continued to fund companies planning to open up new fossil fuel frontiers, including by financing disastrous projects like the East African Crude Oil Pipeline, expansion of fracking in Argentina's Vaca Muerta and the expansion of the Trans Mountain tar sands pipeline. Any serious 'Net Zero by 2050' commitment must also mean excluding all fossil fuel expansion projects and companies from financing."

Alison Kirsch, Research and Policy Manager at Rainforest Action Network:

“Any further expansion of fossil fuels risks locking humanity into generations of climate catastrophe, yet the top fossil clients of the world’s largest banks are still being showered with tens of billions of dollars even as they actively expand drilling, mining, fracking and other fossil fuel development unabated. With Wall Street banks leading the charge, these financial institutions are directly complicit in undermining a climate stable future for us all and must immediately end their support of any further fossil fuel infrastructure expansion.”

Mea Johnson, Divestment Campaign Coordinator, Indigenous Environmental Network:

"These banks are funding climate chaos by financing fossil fuel extraction to the tune of US$ 742 billion in 2021 alone. Indigenous peoples have long been leading the fight for the sacredness of the land, water and Earth. Mother Earth has always given us what we need to thrive. We will not back down until our natural balance is restored and anyone helping fund the extractive destruction of our communities will be held accountable."

Lucie Pinson, Director at Reclaim Finance:

"The data is clear: despite their net zero pledges and restrictions on fossil fuel financing, French banks BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Société Générale and Natixis are still massively supporting oil and gas expansion, at odds with what climate science requires. No surprises there: as recently revealed by the Oil and Gas Policy Tracker, the many flaws in their oil and gas policies enable the banks to support major expansionists such as Gazprom, TotalEnergies, Saudi Aramco and BP despite their toxic fossil fuel plans. The war on Ukraine is another stark reminder that oil and gas are at the root of both war and climate change. It’s high time banks close the policy gaps and turn off the taps."

Adele Shraiman, Campaign Representative for the Sierra Club's Fossil-Free Finance campaign:

"Despite their splashy climate pledges, big banks have largely continued with business-as-usual and actually increased their overall fossil fuel financing since the Paris Agreement. This report makes it clear that banks must clean up their act and stop funding the expansion of dirty fossil fuel projects like fracked gas exports, tar sands pipelines, and offshore drilling in order to align with what the science demands and what their own commitments require. As we look ahead to shareholder season, we'll be keeping up the pressure on the banks and their investors to take these critical reforms seriously and stop bankrolling the fossil fuel industry's reckless expansion plans."

Katrin Ganswindt, Head of Finance Research at Urgewald:

"On top of unleashing climate chaos around the globe, our continued reliance on fossil fuels is propping up some of the world's most heinous political regimes. Russia is waging a brutal war on Ukraine where it treats civilians as legitimate military targets. Saudi Arabia still maintains its violent stranglehold on Yemen, and at home, it put 81 men to death by beheading in a single day. Yet the rest of the world turns a blind eye and keeps sending such oppressive regimes bloody fossil fuel checks. We desperately need to direct global financial flows away from destructive fossil fuels and the cruel and corrupt governments that weaponize them against our environment and ourselves."

Go to:
Start
Related Banks

Related banks

Agricultural Bank of China China

active

ANZ Australia

active

Banco Santander Spain

active

Bank of America United States

active

Bank of China China

active

Bank of Communications China

active

Bank of Montreal (BMO) Canada

active

Barclays United Kingdom

active

BBVA Spain

active

BNP Paribas France

active

BPCE France

active

CaixaBank Spain

active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Canada

active

China CITIC Bank China

active

China Construction Bank China

active

China Everbright Bank China

active

China Merchants Bank China

active

China Minsheng Bank China

active

Citi United States

active

Commerzbank Germany

active

Commonwealth Bank Australia

active

Crédit Agricole France

active

Crédit Mutuel France

active

Credit Suisse Switzerland

active

Danske Bank Denmark

active

Deutsche Bank Germany

active

DZ Bank Germany

active

Goldman Sachs United States

active

HSBC United Kingdom

active

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) China

active

Industrial Bank China

active

ING Netherlands

active

Intesa Sanpaolo Italy

active

JPMorgan Chase United States

active

KB Financial Group South Korea

active

La Banque Postale France

active

Lloyds Banking Group United Kingdom

active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Japan

active

Mizuho Financial Group Japan

active

Morgan Stanley United States

active

National Australia Bank (NAB) Australia

active

NatWest Group United Kingdom

active

Nordea Finland

active

Ping An Bank China

active

PNC United States

active

Postal Savings Bank of China China

active

Rabobank Netherlands

active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Canada

active

Scotiabank Canada

active

Shanghai Pudong Development Bank China

active

Société Générale France

active

Standard Chartered United Kingdom

active

State Bank of India India

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Japan

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Japan

active

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank) Canada

active

UBS Switzerland

active

UniCredit Italy

active

Wells Fargo United States

active

Westpac Australia

active
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted