Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Right-wing attack on sustainable finance is the latest form of climate denial
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
Equator Banks fail communities on consultation and grievance mechanisms, new study finds
BankTrack research into nine projects financed ‘under Equator’ finds routine failures to conduct proper community consultation and a lack of effective project-level grievance mechanisms
Start
Banks
Dodgy Deals

By: BankTrack
2020-11-24
Nijmegen

Contact:

Hannah Greep, hannah@banktrack.org


Share this page:

"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II. Photo: BankTrack
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Communities affected by projects financed under the Equator Principles, banks’ own rules for financing large infrastructure projects, report that consultation is unsatisfactory and they are unable to seek redress through effective accountability mechanisms. This is despite the Principles requiring that effective stakeholder engagement and project-level grievance mechanisms are put in place. These issues are reflected in the findings of BankTrack’s new briefing paper, “Trust Us, We’re Equator Banks” Part II, published today. Although banks began implementing a new version of the Equator Principles, “EP4”, in October, the new Principles do not address these shortcomings.  

The paper investigates nine projects financed under the Equator Principles since 2016, in high-risk sectors such as mining, hydropower, coal, oil and gas. It finds that the banks financing the projects failed to ensure adequate assessment documentation was provided to affected stakeholders for seven out of the nine projects analysed, although this is a requirement of the Principles. In addition, it found that although the Equator Principles require project-level grievance mechanisms to be put in place so that project-affected communities can raise complaints and seek resolution, in many cases these mechanisms are not actually being used. Reasons include distrust in project sponsors and a lack of awareness of the mechanism.

For example, local communities impacted by the Nachtigal Hydropower project in Cameroon have been unable to access full environmental and social impact studies, including resettlement and compensation actions plans. In addition, communities reported that consultation meetings were often threatening environments where individuals felt unable to raise their concerns. Although the company has implemented a project-level grievance mechanism, local communities did not know that it existed. 

This briefing paper is the second instalment in an effort to systematically evaluate for the first time whether key aspects of the Equator Principles are being followed. It follows an earlier paper which analysed 37 projects and found no evidence of stakeholder engagement processes or project-level grievance mechanisms in 65% of cases. The results highlight a number of problems regarding compliance with the Principles on the ground. 

Based on the findings of the two research papers, BankTrack has made six recommendations for how the Equator Principles Association (EPA) and Equator Principles Financial Institutions (EPFIs) can address the issues identified and improve overall compliance with the Principles on the ground, without resorting to a new update of the Principles: 

  1. Require consent from clients for project name disclosure as part of loan agreements

  2. Publish a Compliance Report to show how projects are meeting EP requirements

  3. Invest in ensuring clients do stakeholder engagement well

  4. Ensure project-level grievance mechanisms are not just in place, but effective

  5. Establish an initiative-level Accountability Mechanism for the Equator Principles

  6. De-list EPFIs that persistently fail to comply with the EP

Hannah Greep, coordinator of BankTrack’s Equator Principles campaign and author of the briefing paper, commented: “Communities that are confronted by plans for large infrastructure projects that potentially negatively impact their lands, rights and livelihoods should be able to rely on the Equator Principles to ensure that they are being adequately consulted on how such projects are designed and how impacts will be mitigated. Similarly, when things go wrong, which they inevitably sometimes do, the Principles are meant to ensure that their grievances are properly addressed and resolved. 

"Yet our research shows that the Equator Principles are, in most cases, not working for communities. More needs to be done by the Equator Principles Association and signatory banks to ensure the Principles are a framework that effectively manages social and environmental risk, and that works for financial institutions, affected communities and the planet alike.”

See the full briefing paper here.

Note for editors:

In the Equator Principles, Principle 5 requires all Category A and B projects (The highest risk categories) to have an ongoing process of effective stakeholder engagement with affected communities and other stakeholders. Under Principle 6, they require all Category A projects and “as appropriate” Category B projects, to establish a project-level grievance mechanism which is designed to receive and facilitate resolution of concerns and grievances about the project’s environmental and social performance. 

 
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related banks

ABN AMRO Netherlands

active

Banco Sabadell Spain

active

Banco Santander Spain

active

Bank of America United States

active

Bank of Montreal (BMO) Canada

active

BBVA Spain

active

BNP Paribas France

active

CaixaBank Spain

active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Canada

active

Citi United States

active

Commonwealth Bank Australia

active

Crédit Agricole France

active

Credit Suisse Switzerland

active

DNB Norway

active

FMO Netherlands

active

HSBC United Kingdom

active

ING Netherlands

active

Intesa Sanpaolo Italy

active

JPMorgan Chase United States

active

KfW IPEX-Bank Germany

active

Korea Development Bank (KDB) South Korea

active

Lloyds Banking Group United Kingdom

active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Japan

active

Mizuho Financial Group Japan

active

National Australia Bank (NAB) Australia

active

Natixis France

active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Canada

active

Scotiabank Canada

active

Société Générale France

active

Standard Bank South Africa

active

Standard Chartered United Kingdom

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Japan

active

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank) Canada

active

UniCredit Italy

active

Wells Fargo United States

active
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related Dodgy Deals

Projects

active

Nachtigal hydropower plant Cameroon

Hydroelectric Power Generation
There are no projects active for this item now.
on record

Cirebon 2 coal power plant Indonesia

Coal Electric Power Generation
on record

Dakota Access Pipeline United States

Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil
on record

Dominion Cove Point LNG United States

LNG Terminal
on record

Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) - international -

Oil and Gas Extraction | Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted