BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Barclays, HSBC and Credit Suisse among worst offenders on oil sands finance

ShareAction says Barclays has participated in 11 loan and bond deals to oil sands companies since its net zero announcement in March
2020-10-29 | London
By: ShareAction
Contact:

Jeanne Martin
Senior Campaign Manager
ShareAction

High Risk, Low Reward. Photo: ShareAction
2020-10-29 | London
By: ShareAction
Contact:

Jeanne Martin
Senior Campaign Manager
ShareAction

New research from ShareAction shows that despite the urgent need to phase out carbon-intensive oil sands production, many European banks retain significant involvement in the sector and have “weak and ineffective policies” for phasing out oil sands finance.

Barclays, HSBC, and Credit Suisse are among the worst offenders, as the only European banks to have continued participating in debt financing deals with Canadian upstream players since the signing of the Paris Agreement. All three banks also fund TC Energy and Enbridge, the two companies building the controversial Keystone XL and Line 3 Replacement pipelines.

Barclays and Credit Suisse were found to have two of the weakest policies, with no corporate or asset-level exclusions on oil sands finance (see table).

9454
image004.jpg
center
.
Photo:

Barclays has described its exposure to oil sands as a “very small business” with just £20 million of revenue generated in 2019, representing approximately 0.1 per cent of its total revenue. But ShareAction said this “does not give an idea of the underlying credit risk nor the magnitude of the bank’s historical support to the oil sands sector… Barclays has provided USD 3.2 billion of oil sands financing since the signing of the Paris Agreement, a significant source of support for an otherwise failing sector. The rationale to maintain an exposure to a sector that represents a marginal part of its revenues is unclear considering the potential downside in terms of reputational risk, giving the impression the bank is picking up pennies in front of a steamroller." 

Xavier Lerin, senior banking analyst at ShareAction also highlighted the incompatibility of Barclays’ oil sands finance with its ambition to be a net zero bank, noting that:
Since its net zero announcement in March, Barclays has participated in 11 loan and bond deals to major tar sands companies, including infrastructure companies building out extra pipeline capacity.”

These 11 deals include a loan to Enbridge, which closed on 30 March 2020, the same day as Barclays set out its net zero ambition.

ShareAction’s analysis of other banks’ oil sands policies also revealed that a number of alleged asset-level exclusions are in fact merely restrictions. For example, asset-level exclusions at Deutsche Bank and HSBC only apply to new projects, allowing the banks to continue funding existing oil sands assets.

BNP Paribas have the most robust policy to limit oil sands investment according to the report. It has implemented corporate restrictions using thresholds relative to companies’ exposure to oil sands and its policy covers all the bank’s products and services (funding, advisory, ancillary) and includes its asset management arm.

However, as its exclusion policy only applies to companies with a substantial share of oil sands activity, it allows room for the bank to continue funding international integrated or diversified players with significant oil sands investments.

As a result, even ExxonMobil, with around seven per cent revenues and 16 per cent reserves from oil sands, slips through the net of even the most ambitious current oil sands policy. 

As such, ShareAction argues that robust oil sands policies must include:

• Immediate prohibition of project finance related to new oil sands, including related infrastructure such as pipelines, and of project finance related to the material expansion of existing projects;
• A timebound, measurable plan to phase out exposure to companies that are highly dependent on oil sands, including related infrastructure such as pipelines, and companies working to expand the oil sands infrastructure, including pipelines, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement;
• Exclusions for both expansions and new developments;
• Restrictions at both asset and corporate level, with restrictions on use of proceeds;
• Restrictions throughout the value chain (including upstream and infrastructure/transportation activities); and
• Restrictions applying to all financial services including advisory and asset management.

In cases where oil sands are a small percentage of a company’s total revenues and/or operating activities, such as in the case of diversified oil and gas companies, ShareAction argued that banks should ask their clients to publish credible transition plans by a specific date. These plans should outline how the client plans to exit the oil sands industry and close their remaining oil sands assets on a timeline aligned with the Paris climate goals.

Banks

Banco Santander

Spain
Active

Bank of America

United States
Active

Bank of Montreal (BMO)

Canada
Active

Barclays

United Kingdom
Active

BBVA

Spain
Active

BNP Paribas

France
Active

BPCE

France
Active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)

Canada
Active

Citi

United States
Active

Commerzbank

Germany
Active

Crédit Agricole

France
Active

Credit Suisse

Switzerland
Active

Deutsche Bank

Germany
Active

HSBC

United Kingdom
Active

ING

Netherlands
Active

Intesa Sanpaolo

Italy
Active

JPMorgan Chase

United States
Active

Natixis

France
Active

NatWest Group

United Kingdom
Active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)

Canada
Active

Scotiabank

Canada
Active

Société Générale

France
Active

Standard Chartered

United Kingdom
Active

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank)

Canada
Active

UBS

Switzerland
Active

UniCredit

Italy
Active
Dodgy Deals

Line 3 Replacement Pipeline

United States
Project
Active
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

Line 3 Replacement Pipeline

United States
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Keystone XL pipeline

United States
Project
On record
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

Keystone XL pipeline

United States
There are no active company profiles for this item now.

Enbridge

Canada
Company
on record
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil | ...

Enbridge

Canada

TC Energy

Canada
Company
on record
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil | Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas

TC Energy

Canada
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted