BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Russia
Banks and Steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin Login
Home › BankTrack news ›
BankTrack News

Equator Principles requirements missing for most projects, finds new BankTrack study

Research into 37 projects financed 'under Equator' finds project-level grievance mechanisms or stakeholder engagement processes cannot be evidenced in 65% of cases
2020-08-11
By: BankTrack
Contact:

Hannah Greep, hannah@banktrack.org

Tracking the Equator Principles. Photo: BankTrack
2020-08-11
By: BankTrack
Contact:

Hannah Greep, hannah@banktrack.org

New research into implementation of the Equator Principles – banks' rules for financing large infrastructure projects, followed by 108 financial institutions – has found that the existence of a stakeholder engagement process or project-level complaints mechanisms cannot be evidenced in 24 out of 37 projects analysed (65%). In 16 cases (43%), neither a stakeholder engagement process nor a project-level complaints mechanism could be found. The projects analysed are focused in high-risk sectors such as oil, gas, hydropower and mining.

BankTrack’s new briefing paper, “Trust us, we’re Equator Banks”, details that in several instances, banks responded to the initial findings by insisting that stakeholder engagement or grievance processes are in place on the ground, but that the bank financing the project is unable to provide any references or evidence to support this, including for reasons of ‘client confidentiality’.

The research represents the first systematic evaluation of whether aspects of the Equator Principles are being followed. The results call into question the extent to which the Equator Principles are actually being adhered to on the ground.  

Following the results of this research, BankTrack is calling on the Equator Principles Association (EPA) to ensure that compliance with the Principles does not need to be taken on trust, and to ensure a Compliance Report is made publicly available by banks setting out how each of the ten principles have been implemented for each project financed under the Principles, with links to grievance processes and other key documents. Where EPFIs repeatedly do not show evidence of EP compliance, they should be de-listed.

BankTrack also continues to urge the EPA to create an initiative-level accountability mechanism which allows project affected communities, or their legitimate representatives, to raise instances of alleged non-compliance with the EPs by Equator banks. The low level of apparent compliance with the EPs shown by this research adds strength to the argument for such an initiative-level mechanism.

BankTrack’s Hannah Greep, the author of the briefing paper, commented: “The Equator Principles Association and signatory banks should not be asking its stakeholders to take Equator Principles compliance on trust, particularly given the record of disastrous projects like the Dakota Access Pipeline in the US and the Agua Zarca dam in Honduras being financed under the Principles. As the banks prepare to begin implementing the new version of the Principles, EP4, in October, we will need to see evidence that they are being implemented in full. It is in the interests of those banks that do follow their own rules not to allow free riders.”

Under the Equator Principles, all Category A and B projects (the highest risk categories) are required to have an ongoing process of effective stakeholder engagement with affected communities and other stakeholders. Under Principle 6, they require all Category A projects and “as appropriate” Category B Projects, to establish a project-level grievance mechanism which is designed to receive and facilitate resolution of concerns and grievances about the project’s environmental and social performance.

Banks

ABN AMRO

Netherlands
Active

Absa Group

South Africa
Active

ANZ

Australia
Active

Banco Sabadell

Spain
Active

Bancolombia

Colombia
Active

BBVA

Spain
Active

BNP Paribas

France
Active

CaixaBank

Spain
Active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)

Canada
Active

CIFI

Panama
Active

Citi

United States
Active

Crédit Agricole

France
Active

E.SUN Bank

Taiwan, Republic of China
Active

Export Development Canada

Canada
Active

FMO

Netherlands
Active

HSBC

United Kingdom
Active

ING

Netherlands
Active

Intesa Sanpaolo

Italy
Active

KfW IPEX-Bank

Germany
Active

Korea Development Bank (KDB)

South Korea
Active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG)

Japan
Active

National Australia Bank (NAB)

Australia
Active

Natixis

France
Active

Nedbank

South Africa
Active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)

Canada
Active

Société Générale

France
Active

Standard Bank

South Africa
Active

Standard Chartered

United Kingdom
Active

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group

Japan
Active

UniCredit

Italy
Active

Wells Fargo

United States
Active
Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Dominion Cove Point LNG

United States
Project
On record
LNG Terminal

Dominion Cove Point LNG

United States

Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP)

- international -
Project
On record
Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas | ...

Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP)

- international -
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Russia Banks and Steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin
©2023 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted