Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Right-wing attack on sustainable finance is the latest form of climate denial
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
Equator Principles requirements missing for most projects, finds new BankTrack study
Research into 37 projects financed 'under Equator' finds project-level grievance mechanisms or stakeholder engagement processes cannot be evidenced in 65% of cases
Start
Banks
Dodgy Deals

By: BankTrack
2020-08-11

Contact:

Hannah Greep, hannah@banktrack.org


Share this page:

Tracking the Equator Principles. Photo: BankTrack
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

New research into implementation of the Equator Principles – banks' rules for financing large infrastructure projects, followed by 108 financial institutions – has found that the existence of a stakeholder engagement process or project-level complaints mechanisms cannot be evidenced in 24 out of 37 projects analysed (65%). In 16 cases (43%), neither a stakeholder engagement process nor a project-level complaints mechanism could be found. The projects analysed are focused in high-risk sectors such as oil, gas, hydropower and mining.

BankTrack’s new briefing paper, “Trust us, we’re Equator Banks”, details that in several instances, banks responded to the initial findings by insisting that stakeholder engagement or grievance processes are in place on the ground, but that the bank financing the project is unable to provide any references or evidence to support this, including for reasons of ‘client confidentiality’.

The research represents the first systematic evaluation of whether aspects of the Equator Principles are being followed. The results call into question the extent to which the Equator Principles are actually being adhered to on the ground.  

Following the results of this research, BankTrack is calling on the Equator Principles Association (EPA) to ensure that compliance with the Principles does not need to be taken on trust, and to ensure a Compliance Report is made publicly available by banks setting out how each of the ten principles have been implemented for each project financed under the Principles, with links to grievance processes and other key documents. Where EPFIs repeatedly do not show evidence of EP compliance, they should be de-listed.

BankTrack also continues to urge the EPA to create an initiative-level accountability mechanism which allows project affected communities, or their legitimate representatives, to raise instances of alleged non-compliance with the EPs by Equator banks. The low level of apparent compliance with the EPs shown by this research adds strength to the argument for such an initiative-level mechanism.

BankTrack’s Hannah Greep, the author of the briefing paper, commented: “The Equator Principles Association and signatory banks should not be asking its stakeholders to take Equator Principles compliance on trust, particularly given the record of disastrous projects like the Dakota Access Pipeline in the US and the Agua Zarca dam in Honduras being financed under the Principles. As the banks prepare to begin implementing the new version of the Principles, EP4, in October, we will need to see evidence that they are being implemented in full. It is in the interests of those banks that do follow their own rules not to allow free riders.”

Under the Equator Principles, all Category A and B projects (the highest risk categories) are required to have an ongoing process of effective stakeholder engagement with affected communities and other stakeholders. Under Principle 6, they require all Category A projects and “as appropriate” Category B Projects, to establish a project-level grievance mechanism which is designed to receive and facilitate resolution of concerns and grievances about the project’s environmental and social performance.

Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related banks

ABN AMRO Netherlands

active

Absa Group South Africa

active

ANZ Australia

active

Banco Sabadell Spain

active

Bancolombia Colombia

active

BBVA Spain

active

BNP Paribas France

active

CaixaBank Spain

active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Canada

active

CIFI Panama

active

Citi United States

active

Crédit Agricole France

active

E.SUN Bank Taiwan, Republic of China

active

Export Development Canada Canada

active

FMO Netherlands

active

HSBC United Kingdom

active

ING Netherlands

active

Intesa Sanpaolo Italy

active

KfW IPEX-Bank Germany

active

Korea Development Bank (KDB) South Korea

active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Japan

active

National Australia Bank (NAB) Australia

active

Natixis France

active

Nedbank South Africa

active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Canada

active

Société Générale France

active

Standard Bank South Africa

active

Standard Chartered United Kingdom

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Japan

active

UniCredit Italy

active

Wells Fargo United States

active
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related Dodgy Deals

Projects

There are no projects active for this item now.
on record

Dominion Cove Point LNG United States

LNG Terminal
on record

Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) - international -

Oil and Gas Extraction | Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted