Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2021-02-24 00:00:00
Protect the climate but finance Total?
2021-02-16 00:00:00
Oil and gas financiers are staring down the barrel at $1 trillion in losses: time to rein in support for new pipelines
2021-02-11 00:00:00
Beefing up risk: the exposure of JBS’ financiers to financial, regulatory and reputational risks
2021-01-25 00:00:00
Why should banks support EU mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence?
2021-04-22 21:42:58
Three major French banks will not finance EACOP, according to French media
2020-09-24 12:53:20
Oscislowo open-pit coal mine cancelled
2020-09-08 13:07:41
Strengthened OECD guidance on responsible banking
2020-02-25 10:35:27
JPMorgan Chase Coal and Arctic Policy a step forward but fails to match its climate responsibility as the world’s #1 Fossil Bank
Connect
2021-03-24 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2021
2021-03-22 00:00:00
BankTrack Annual Report 2020
2021-02-01 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice
2020-11-30 00:00:00
Soft Commitments, Hard Lessons: an analysis of the Soft Commodities Compact
2020-11-24 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II
2020-11-18 00:00:00
Crude Risk: Risks to banks and investors from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Home › Blog
Energy Transfer: Which banks continue to support the company behind DAPL?
Start
Banks
Dodgy Deals

By: Alison Kirsch - Rainforest Action Network
2017-04-06

Share this page:

Protest against Wells Fargo about DAPL. Photo: Rainforest Action Network

Just like a homeowner might refinance their mortgage, when a company refinances its debt, it can replace its agreement with the banks with a new deal that may prove more favorable to the company, or extend the length of the deal.

On March 24, 2017, Energy Transfer Equity (ETE) -- parent of the family of companies behind the disastrous Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) -- refinanced its credit agreement, essentially meaning a new credit agreement was signed.

So, this was a test for the big banks, to see if they’ve learned any lessons after all the criticism they got for funding DAPL and Energy Transfer. Did they start cutting ties with the company? Or did they get right back in line to keep funding egregious human rights abuses?

Five banks that were previously on Energy Transfer Equity’s revolving credit did the right thing, and chose not to support ETE’s new credit:

  • ABN Amro (Netherlands)
  • DNB (Norway)
  • ING (Netherlands)
  • Intesa Sanpaolo (Italy)
  • RBS (Scotland)

This means that ING is following through on its March 21 commitment to “stop doing any new business with the companies, not renewing credit facilities that expire, effectively ending the relationship.” Both ING and DNB have sold off their stakes in the project finance loan that actually built DAPL -- but this move shows that they understand the risks of staying involved with the companies.

On the other hand, four banks did the opposite -- where previously they weren’t on ETE’s line of credit, in March they decided to bankroll the company:

  • Bank of Nova Scotia (Canada)
  • CIBC (Canada)
  • Fifth Third Bank (U.S.)
  • TD Bank (Canada)

Public Pressure Works
DNB, ING, and Intesa Sanpaolo were all part of the 17 banks directly funding DAPL -- so their backing away from the company behind the project is a good indication that they felt the heat and learned their lesson.

TD Bank hasn’t learned the same lesson -- and in fact, TD and two of their Canadian peer banks are showing that they do not care about the track record of their clients. At the same time, TD is doubling down on projects that kill the climate and trample Indigenous rights by taking on a lead arranger role for Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain tar sands pipeline.

Meanwhile, banks like Citi, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo continue to fund Energy Transfer, without taking this opportunity to exit the relationship. With the intense criticism Citi and Wells Fargo got for funding DAPL, these banks have tried to reassure the public that they really do care about Indigenous human rights -- but they haven’t put their money where their mouth is.

That’s why we’re calling for a week of action targeting Citi, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and TD Bank -- not only for supporting the companies behind DAPL, but also for not learning their lesson -- as all of these banks are also bankrolling TransCanada, the company behind the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.

P.S. Here's the full list of banks that on March 24, 2017, committed USD 1.5 billion to Energy Transfer Equity:

Bank Country Amount
Bank of America United States USD 67,470,600
♦ Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Japan USD 67,470,600
• Bank of Nova Scotia Canada USD 67,470,600
Barclays United Kingdom USD 67,470,600
♦ BNP Paribas France USD 40,000,000
♦ Calyon Securities (Credit Argicole) France USD 65,500,000
• CIBC Canada USD 40,000,000
♦ Citibank United Stated USD 67,470,600
♦ Campass Bank (BBVA) Spain USD 65,500,000
Credit Suisse Switzerland USD 67,470,600
Deutsche Bank Germany USD 67,470,600
• Fifth Third Bank United States USD 67,470,600
Goldman Sachs United States USD 67,470,600
HSBC United Kingdom USD 30,000,000
JPMorgan Chase United States USD 67,470,600
♦ Mizuho Japan USD 67,470,600
Morgan Stanley United States USD 67,470,600
♦ Natixis France USD 67,470,600
PNC United States USD 40,000,000
Royal Bank of Canada Canada USD 67,470,600
♦ SMBC Japan USD 67,470,600
♦ Suntrust United States USD 40,000,000
♦ • Toronto Dominion (TD) Bank Canada USD 67,470,600
UBS Switzerland USD 67,470,600
♦ Wells Fargo United States USD 32,000,000

• Banks that made new commitments to Energy Transfer Equity in March 2017.

♦ Banks that directly funded the Dakota Access Pipeline. 

Note: RBS reported in November 2016 that they exited their relationship with Energy Transfer Equitiy in November 2015.

Related banks

Bank of America United States

active

Barclays United Kingdom

active

BBVA Spain

active

BNP Paribas France

active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Canada

active

Citi United States

active

Crédit Agricole France

active

Credit Suisse Switzerland

active

Deutsche Bank Germany

active

Goldman Sachs United States

active

HSBC United Kingdom

active

JPMorgan Chase United States

active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Japan

active

Mizuho Financial Group Japan

active

Morgan Stanley United States

active

Natixis France

active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Canada

active

Scotiabank Canada

active

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Japan

active

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank) Canada

active

Truist Financial Corporation United States

active

UBS Switzerland

active

Wells Fargo United States

active

PNC United States

on record

Related Dodgy Deals

Projects

active

Dakota Access Pipeline United States

Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil
There are no projects active for this item now.
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted