BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Europe’s largest banks falling short on climate and biodiversity action

New ShareAction research uncovers urgent need for UK and European banking sector to close loopholes in climate and biodiversity strategies
2022-12-12
By: ShareAction
Contact:

ShareAction press office, +44 20 7183 4184

The cover of the 'In Debt to the Planet' report. Photo: ShareAction
2022-12-12
By: ShareAction
Contact:

ShareAction press office, +44 20 7183 4184

ShareAction, the UK’s leading responsible investment NGO, has today issued a major report into Europe’s top 25 banks and their approaches to tackling climate change and protecting the world’s natural habitats. 

The report, In Debt to the Planet, identifies some improvements in banks’ climate and biodiversity strategies since ShareAction’s last survey in 2020, but reveals that Europe’s top banks still have a long way to go to meet internationally agreed standards to deal with the global climate crisis, cut carbon emissions, and safeguard the planet’s vital ecosystems. 

Despite all 25 banks committing their businesses to be net-zero by 2050, ShareAction’s analysis shows banks are still not doing enough to avert the climate crisis and urgently need to improve many of their practices.

Some of the key findings of ‘In Debt to the Planet’ include:

  • Banks’ lack of transparency is leading to underreporting of banks’ support for high-carbon sectors.

  • Most banks now have at least one decarbonisation target in place – however banks’ targets often fail to capture the bulk of banks’ financing to high-carbon sectors and do not always lead to absolute reductions of emissions.

  • Fossil fuel policies are full of loopholes that make them unfit for alignment with 1.5C goal. Despite over three-quarters of banks now having committed to phase out from coal, banks’ thermal coal policies include gaps that allow them to continue financing coal clients. In oil and gas, the banks progress has been much slower.

  • The vast majority of banks lack adequate biodiversity strategies and are failing to include biodiversity in their risk analysis when assessing potential clients and projects.

  • Banks’ green finance strategies leave too much room for ‘greenwashing’.

Commenting on the findings, Peter Uhlenbruch, Director of Financial Sector Standards at ShareAction, said:

“Despite important steps forward, the leadership of Europe’s top banks are not moving fast enough to drive the change needed to protect people and the planet.

“ShareAction has written to the CEOs of each of the banks with a set of tailored recommendations about how they can close loopholes in their climate and biodiversity strategies. 

"Without robust decarbonisation targets underpinned by credible fossil fuel policies, these banks cannot fulfil their commitments to align their businesses with net-zero and prevent the worst impacts of the climate crisis.”

“The banks are paying far too little attention to the threat of biodiversity loss. Bank executives and their boards need to step up and take responsibility for the impact their activities are having on the ecosystems of the world’s oceans, forests and wildlife.” 

“Banks have made promises to investors and the public – it’s time they deliver on those commitments.”

As in previous years ShareAction’s report ranks the banks in order of their environmental policies across the following topics: climate and biodiversity governance, climate risks, climate opportunities, biodiversity strategy, and policy engagement and collaboration with stakeholders. French bank BNP Paribas performed slightly better than others but with a score of only 63 per cent still has a long way to go. The worst performer was DZ Bank from Germany. The best performing UK banks in the report were Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group, followed by HSBC and NatWest.

Table 1: Ranking of Europe’s 25 largest banks based on their performance on key climate and biodiversity metrics   

Bank

Country

Grade

Overall

Biodiversity

Climate

BNP Paribas

France

B+

63%

68%

60%

Societe Generale

France

B

56%

57%

56%

Crédit Agricole

France

B

51%

42%

55%

ING

Netherlands

B

51%

56%

48%

Barclays

UK

B

50%

38%

55%

Lloyds Banking Group

UK

B

50%

40%

54%

Santander

Spain

B−

48%

36%

54%

HSBC

UK

B−

47%

45%

48%

La Banque Postale

France

B−

46%

20%

59%

Rabobank

Netherlands

B−

46%

49%

45%

BPCE

France

B−

46%

40%

49%

NatWest

UK

B−

46%

27%

55%

Credit Suisse

Switzerland

C+

44%

50%

41%

CaixaBank

Spain

C+

43%

39%

45%

UniCredit

Italy

C+

43%

26%

51%

Intesa Sanpaolo

Italy

C+

42%

30%

48%

Deutsche Bank

Germany

C+

42%

43%

41%

Standard Chartered

UK

C

40%

25%

47%

UBS

Switzerland

C−

38%

41%

37%

Nordea

Finland

C−

36%

14%

47%

Crédit Mutuel

France

C−

36%

12%

48%

BBVA

Spain

C−

36%

26%

40%

Commerzbank

Germany

C−

33%

20%

40%

Danske Bank

Denmark

C−

33%

19%

40%

DZ Bank

Germany

D+

29%

14%

36%

 


Key issues uncovered by the research:

Climate targets and fossil fuel policies need urgent attention

  • Although over 80 per cent of banks surveyed have taken the initial step of setting at least one sector-specific target to reduce emissions, crucial gaps remain.

  • When setting sectoral targets, only Barclays includes capital markets activities. As ShareAction uncovered earlier this year, more than half of the financing provided by Europe’s top 25 banks to top oil and gas expanders was in the form of capital markets activities. 

  • Most banks’ targets are intensity-based. Banks must urgently complement these with commitments to halve emissions across their financing activities, making sure that absolute emission cuts are achieved in the real economy.

  • Banks have strengthened their fossil fuel policies over the last two years – but many restrictions have loopholes. This has the effect of minimising their impact. 

  • The average fossil fuel policy scored 43 per cent, with particularly slow progress on oil and gas policies. While the number of banks announcing asset financing restrictions on new oil and gas fields has doubled in eight months, banks are reluctant to introduce any restrictions for new oil and gas at the corporate level. This is despite the stark warning from the International Energy Agency that there is no room for coal expansion and new oil and gas fields if the world is to reach net zero by 2050.

ShareAction is recommending that banks set targets that will guarantee a reduction in absolute emissions for the real economy. These must be backed by effective fossil fuel policies, such as La Banque Postale’s requirement for companies to publish credible transition plans to phase out oil and gas by 2030 and Crédit Mutuel’s comprehensive coal phase out policy.

Banks are only just waking up to the biodiversity crisis

Average performance on biodiversity lagged behind climate across all banks surveyed, with a mean score of 35 per cent compared to 48 per cent for climate. Very few banks currently integrate biodiversity into key risk management processes, and target setting aimed at protecting and restoring biodiversity is almost non-existent, with limited integration of biodiversity in sector policies. This is unlikely to change in the short-term as biodiversity was not a board-level priority for most banks. 

Suspicions of greenwashing abound around banks’ green finance claims

Almost all banks have set a green finance target and claim they are channelling billions towards the low-carbon transition. Yet there’s little clarity on what green finance targets and volumes include and some of these figures seem to be artificially inflated.  Some of the banks' green finance pledges pale in comparison with their historical levels of fossil fuel financing, according to our estimates. We also find that many banks are willing to provide green or transition financing to companies operating in high-carbon sectors without clear requirements that these companies align with robust net-zero roadmaps.

Notes to editors

ShareAction’s 2020 ranking is online and available here.

In November ShareAction published a detailed assessment of the 43 largest banks in the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) who are the biggest financers of fossil fuels, which found that a third had set inadequate decarbonisation targets that undermined their net zero commitments.

ShareAction’s new Cop15 briefing sets out actions the financial sector can take to address biodiversity loss.

Methodology: The survey features the 25 largest European banks (excluding Russia), selected based on their total assets according to the S&P 2022 list of the world’s largest banks. This resulted in the inclusion of all the banks in ShareAction’s 2020 survey aside from ABN AMRO, plus six additional banks: BPCE, CaixaBank, Crédit Mutuel, DZ Bank, La Banque Postale, Rabobank. Differences in methodology between this survey and the 2020 survey mean that the scores are not directly comparable. 

Data was collected between June and August 2022, with an extension until 31 October 2022 for net zero targets. The survey includes questions on biodiversity for the first time and examined both the risks faced by banks and the impacts that their financing has on the climate and our ecosystems. The questionnaire had four parts: climate and biodiversity governance, climate strategy (climate risk and negative impact, and climate opportunities and positive impact), biodiversity strategy, and engagement and collaboration.

 

Originally published by ShareAction here.

Banks

Banco Santander

Spain
Active

Barclays

United Kingdom
Active

BBVA

Spain
Active

BNP Paribas

France
Active

BPCE

France
Active

CaixaBank

Spain
Active

Commerzbank

Germany
Active

Crédit Agricole

France
Active

Crédit Mutuel

France
Active

Credit Suisse

Switzerland
Active

Danske Bank

Denmark
Active

Deutsche Bank

Germany
Active

DZ Bank

Germany
Active

HSBC

United Kingdom
Active

ING

Netherlands
Active

Intesa Sanpaolo

Italy
Active

La Banque Postale

France
Active

Lloyds Banking Group

United Kingdom
Active

NatWest Group

United Kingdom
Active

Nordea

Finland
Active

Rabobank

Netherlands
Active

Société Générale

France
Active

Standard Chartered

United Kingdom
Active

UBS

Switzerland
Active

UniCredit

Italy
Active
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted