BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Russia
Banks and Steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin Login
Home › Partner blog ›
Partner News

Energy Transfer: Which banks continue to support the company behind DAPL?

2017-04-06
By: Alison Kirsch - Rainforest Action Network
Protest against Wells Fargo about DAPL. Photo: Rainforest Action Network
2017-04-06
By: Alison Kirsch - Rainforest Action Network

Just like a homeowner might refinance their mortgage, when a company refinances its debt, it can replace its agreement with the banks with a new deal that may prove more favorable to the company, or extend the length of the deal.

On March 24, 2017, Energy Transfer Equity (ETE) -- parent of the family of companies behind the disastrous Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) -- refinanced its credit agreement, essentially meaning a new credit agreement was signed.

So, this was a test for the big banks, to see if they’ve learned any lessons after all the criticism they got for funding DAPL and Energy Transfer. Did they start cutting ties with the company? Or did they get right back in line to keep funding egregious human rights abuses?

Five banks that were previously on Energy Transfer Equity’s revolving credit did the right thing, and chose not to support ETE’s new credit:

  • ABN Amro (Netherlands)
  • DNB (Norway)
  • ING (Netherlands)
  • Intesa Sanpaolo (Italy)
  • RBS (Scotland)

This means that ING is following through on its March 21 commitment to “stop doing any new business with the companies, not renewing credit facilities that expire, effectively ending the relationship.” Both ING and DNB have sold off their stakes in the project finance loan that actually built DAPL -- but this move shows that they understand the risks of staying involved with the companies.

On the other hand, four banks did the opposite -- where previously they weren’t on ETE’s line of credit, in March they decided to bankroll the company:

  • Bank of Nova Scotia (Canada)
  • CIBC (Canada)
  • Fifth Third Bank (U.S.)
  • TD Bank (Canada)

Public Pressure Works
DNB, ING, and Intesa Sanpaolo were all part of the 17 banks directly funding DAPL -- so their backing away from the company behind the project is a good indication that they felt the heat and learned their lesson.

TD Bank hasn’t learned the same lesson -- and in fact, TD and two of their Canadian peer banks are showing that they do not care about the track record of their clients. At the same time, TD is doubling down on projects that kill the climate and trample Indigenous rights by taking on a lead arranger role for Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain tar sands pipeline.

Meanwhile, banks like Citi, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo continue to fund Energy Transfer, without taking this opportunity to exit the relationship. With the intense criticism Citi and Wells Fargo got for funding DAPL, these banks have tried to reassure the public that they really do care about Indigenous human rights -- but they haven’t put their money where their mouth is.

That’s why we’re calling for a week of action targeting Citi, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and TD Bank -- not only for supporting the companies behind DAPL, but also for not learning their lesson -- as all of these banks are also bankrolling TransCanada, the company behind the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.

P.S. Here's the full list of banks that on March 24, 2017, committed USD 1.5 billion to Energy Transfer Equity:

Bank Country Amount
Bank of America United States USD 67,470,600
♦ Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Japan USD 67,470,600
• Bank of Nova Scotia Canada USD 67,470,600
Barclays United Kingdom USD 67,470,600
♦ BNP Paribas France USD 40,000,000
♦ Calyon Securities (Credit Argicole) France USD 65,500,000
• CIBC Canada USD 40,000,000
♦ Citibank United Stated USD 67,470,600
♦ Campass Bank (BBVA) Spain USD 65,500,000
Credit Suisse Switzerland USD 67,470,600
Deutsche Bank Germany USD 67,470,600
• Fifth Third Bank United States USD 67,470,600
Goldman Sachs United States USD 67,470,600
HSBC United Kingdom USD 30,000,000
JPMorgan Chase United States USD 67,470,600
♦ Mizuho Japan USD 67,470,600
Morgan Stanley United States USD 67,470,600
♦ Natixis France USD 67,470,600
PNC United States USD 40,000,000
Royal Bank of Canada Canada USD 67,470,600
♦ SMBC Japan USD 67,470,600
♦ Suntrust United States USD 40,000,000
♦ • Toronto Dominion (TD) Bank Canada USD 67,470,600
UBS Switzerland USD 67,470,600
♦ Wells Fargo United States USD 32,000,000

• Banks that made new commitments to Energy Transfer Equity in March 2017.

♦ Banks that directly funded the Dakota Access Pipeline. 

Note: RBS reported in November 2016 that they exited their relationship with Energy Transfer Equity in November 2015.

Banks

Bank of America

United States
Active

Barclays

United Kingdom
Active

BBVA

Spain
Active

BNP Paribas

France
Active

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)

Canada
Active

Citi

United States
Active

Crédit Agricole

France
Active

Deutsche Bank

Germany
Active

Goldman Sachs

United States
Active

HSBC

United Kingdom
Active

JPMorgan Chase

United States
Active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG)

Japan
Active

Mizuho Financial Group

Japan
Active

Morgan Stanley

United States
Active

Natixis

France
Active

PNC

United States
Active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)

Canada
Active

Scotiabank

Canada
Active

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group

Japan
Active

Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank)

Canada
Active

Truist Financial Corporation

United States
Active

UBS

Switzerland
Active

Wells Fargo

United States
Active

Credit Suisse

Switzerland
On record
Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Dakota Access Pipeline

United States
Project
On record
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

Dakota Access Pipeline

United States
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Russia Banks and Steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin
©2023 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted