BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Russia
Banks and Steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Get in touch
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin Login
Home › Campaigns › Banks and Climate › Banks and fossil fuel financing ›
Campaign
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022 - Offshore oil and gas. Photo: Rainforest Action Network (RAN)

Banks and offshore oil and gas

By: BankTrack
Contact:

For any feedback or questions on this page please contact us at climate@banktrack.org

Banking on Climate Chaos 2022 - Offshore oil and gas. Photo: Rainforest Action Network (RAN)
By: BankTrack
Contact:

For any feedback or questions on this page please contact us at climate@banktrack.org

Why this campaign?

Go to offshore oil and gas policy table Go to offshore oil and gas exclusion table

Offshore oil and gas

Offshore oil and gas refers to all exploration taking place at sea. Oil and gas can be extracted by drilling a borehole below the seabed and transporting the oil or gas to onshore facilities by either a pipeline or via oil/LNG-carrying ships. Offshore oil and gas production is more challenging than land-based installations due to rough seas, a lack of pre-existing infrastructure, and the need to anchor the platform to the seabed or keep it in place using GPS systems, called dynamic positioning. Drilling at sea is also very expensive – up to many hundred millions of US dollars per well – and can only be profitable when the oil or gas price is high. Recent exploration has opened new areas for offshore oil and gas drilling in Guyana, Suriname, the Mediterranean, and South Africa. 

Drilling offshore for oil and gas is dangerous and several disasters have occured in the last decades, of which the blowout and oil spill of Deepwater Horizon in 2010 remains arguably the most dire example. But even when oil or gas spills do not occur, offshore operations have a negative impact. The drilling itself, its production water (which contains oil and suspended solids), and daily operations on the platform all negatively affect the environment. Finally, the costs of decommissioning an oil platform at the end of operations can cost up to a couple of hundred million US dollars per platform, which oil companies are often not willing to pay. As a consequence, companies often leave these platforms, or parts of them, to deteriorate.

Banks and offshore oil and gas

The severity of the climate crisis requires that banks must urgently take steps to disengage from financing all business activities and projects that continue the world's reliance on fossil fuels. Banks must therefore end support for all new offshore oil and gas projects and implement a full phase-out for financing offshore oil and gas, in line with the Paris climate agreement.

The biggest financiers of offshore oil and gas since the Paris Climate Agreement (2016-2021) are BNP Paribas (USD 36.5 billion), JPMorgan Chase (USD 35 billion) and Citi (USD 34.5 billion).

Bank policies on offshore oil and gas are assessed below. These assessments follow the methodology of our Banking on Climate Chaos 2022 report, published in March 2022. The details section in the table contains further detail on the exact scoring per bank, as well as an overview of relevant policies. 

See here for banks' exposure to the offshore oil and gas sector during 2016-2021.

 

Banks excluding finance for offshore oil and gas

A number of banks have already taken steps to fully or partially exclude offshore oil and gas projects or companies involved in offshore oil and gas operations from their investments. The table below lists banks that have taken such steps. 

Exclusion table offshore oil and gas

BankLast update
Country
Project
Company
Details
Crédit Mutuel
2021-03-24
FRA
-10
France
Profile
Project
Company
20210324
Last update: 2021-03-24
Explanation

Crédit Mutuel prohibits financing for the exploration, production, transport infrastructure of deep sea oil.

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

Danske Bank
2021-03-25
DNK
-1
Denmark
Profile
Project
Company
20210325
Last update: 2021-03-25
Explanation

Danske Bank does not provide financial services to companies that generate more than 5% of their revenues from ultra deep sea oil and gas exploration and production. The threshold applied is based on revenues, and a company may be exempted from this threshold if it "can demonstrate their commitment, and ability, to phase-out the use and production of fossil fuels in alignment with the 2015 Paris Agreement."

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

Relevant policies
2021-03-25 00:00:00

Position Statement on Fossil Fuels out of date

Bank policy
2021-03-25 00:00:00
private
Lloyds Banking Group
2021-03-24
GBR
-10
United Kingdom
Profile
Project
Company
20210324
Last update: 2021-03-24
Explanation

Lloyds Banking Group will not generally support businesses involved only in exploration, which is particularly salient offshore.

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

NatWest
2021-03-24
GBR
-10
United Kingdom
Profile
Project
3.5
Company
20210324
Last update: 2021-03-24
Explanation

NatWest does not finance projects involving exploration for new oil and gas reserves, which includes offshore exploration projects.

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

Relevant policies
2020-07-31 00:00:00

Oil & gas sector policy out of date

Bank policy
2020-07-31 00:00:00
private
Raiffeisen Bank International Group
2022-06-28
AUT
90
Austria
Profile
Project
Company
20220628
Last update: 2022-06-28
Explanation

Projects:

RBI prohibits financing for ultra-deepwater (>1.500 m) oil and gas extraction projects, as well as "pipelines and other infrastructure SOLELY related" to ultra-deepwater oil and gas.

Companies:

RBI Group requires new and existing clients to get <25% of their revenue from ultra-deepwater oil and gas. For existing clients above that threshold, they must have a plan to get below that threshold, to be evaluated annually and they must have an environmental management policy in place including a description how the organization minimizes the adverse impacts on water ecosystems associated with the sector activities (including destruction of natural land forms and the wildlife). The fulfilment will be evaluated annually. RBI Group will phase out companies producing more than 25% ultra-deepwater oil & gas until 2025 whenever RBI is aware of and has access to this information. RBI will make efforts to collect the respective information.

Relevant policies
2022-06-30 00:00:00

Exclusion Policy on Oil & Gas

Bank policy
2022-06-30 00:00:00
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (SEB)
2021-02-01
SWE
-10
Sweden
Profile
Project
Company
20210201
Last update: 2021-02-01
Explanation

SEB will not provide financial services to offshore related fossil assets (drilling rigs, seismic equipment and dedicated fossil extraction offshore support vessels) where revenue from these assets represents more than 5% of an owners' revenue.

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

Relevant policies
2021-02-23 00:00:00

Sector Policy on Fossil Fuels out of date

Bank policy
2021-02-23 00:00:00
private
UniCredit Group
2021-03-24
ITA
-11
Italy
Profile
Project
3.5
Company
20210324
Last update: 2021-03-24
Explanation

UniCredit prohibits financing for ultra-deepwater oil and gas extraction projects, as well as "pipelines and other infrastructure SOLELY related" to ultra-deepwater oil and gas.

UniCredit requires new and existing clients to get ≤25% of their revenue from ultra-deepwater oil and gas. For existing clients above that threshold, they must have a plan to get below that threshold, to be evaluated annually.

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

Relevant policies
2019-11-27 00:00:00

Arctic and Non-Conventional Oil & Gas Industry Sector Policy out of date

Bank policy
2019-11-27 00:00:00
private
US Bancorp
2021-03-24
USA
-10
United States
Profile
Project
Company
20210324
Last update: 2021-03-24
Explanation

U.S. Bank does not provide project financing of long-term infrastructure or industrial projects, which would include offshore oil and gas projects. This prohibition does not appear to cover all forms of direct financing for these projects.

See: Policy scores Excel sheet

Relevant policies
2020-02-11 00:00:00

Environmental responsibility policy

Bank policy
2020-02-11 00:00:00
Explanation

This table lists banks that have adopted a full ( ) or partial ( ) exclusion policy for offshore oil and gas projects and/or companies. Click on 'Details' for the rationale of this assessment for each bank.

 

Feedback welcome

Our policy assessments are always a work in progress and we very much welcome any feedback, especially from banks included in them. You can of course also contact us for more information on specific scores and the latest policy changes. Please get in touch at climate@banktrack.org.

Dodgy Deals
All
Projects
Companies

Jackdaw gas field

United Kingdom
Project
On record
Oil and Gas Extraction

Jackdaw gas field

United Kingdom | project | on record

Rosebank

United Kingdom
Project
On record
Oil and Gas Extraction

Rosebank

United Kingdom | project | on record
Resources
Documents
2021-03-24 00:00:00

Banking on Climate Chaos 2021

Fossil Fuel Finance Report
BankTrack publication
2021-03-24 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance & Sierra Club
2020-03-18 00:00:00

Banking on Climate Change - Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2020

BankTrack publication
2020-03-18 00:00:00 | Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
2020-03-18 00:00:00

Banking on Climate Change - Fossil Finance Report Card 2020 [Excel sheet]

Excel sheet with detailed bank policy scores
Other document
2020-03-18 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Rainforest Action Network, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
2019-03-20 00:00:00

Banking on Climate Change 2019

2019 Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card
BankTrack publication
2019-03-20 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Honor the Earth, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club
2017-09-25 00:00:00

Banks: High Carbon, Hidden Risks

NGO document
2017-09-25 00:00:00 | Rainforest Action Network
2017-06-21 00:00:00

Banking on Climate Change 2017

Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2017
BankTrack publication
2017-06-21 00:00:00 | Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Sierra Club, Oil Change International
2017-05-04 00:00:00

UBS Fossil Bank Briefing 2017

BankTrack publication
2017-05-04 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Greenpeace, Waterkeeper Alliance
2017-04-28 00:00:00

Credit Suisse Fossil Bank Briefing 2017

BankTrack publication
2017-04-28 00:00:00 | BankTrack and Greenpeace
2016-06-14 00:00:00

Shorting the Climate

Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2016
BankTrack publication
2016-06-14 00:00:00 | BankTrack, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club, Oil Change International
2012-02-01 00:00:00

Offshore Oil Drilling and Production Policy

Bank policy
2012-02-01 00:00:00 | WestLB
2007-12-12 00:00:00

A Challenging Climate

What international banks should do to combat climate change
BankTrack publication
2007-12-12 00:00:00 | BankTrack
News
BankTrack
Partners
Blog
External
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Spotlight: Brazil’s new private offshore production projects

2023-09-12
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Banks committed to net zero still funding North Sea oil expansion by Equinor

Over 60 organisations have written to Equinor's biggest bankers warning them not to fund the company's controversial Rosebank oil field due to climate risks.
2023-07-04 | BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Climate groups call on Shell’s bankers to stop Jackdaw gas field

UK government’s regulatory approval opens the door for Shell to move ahead with the Jackdaw field
2022-06-03 | BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Total’s deal with Suriname: the greenwashing of oil Block 58

Will this be the final red flag for the oil major’s financiers?
2021-11-24 | Maaike Beenes – BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Meet the banks funding the owners of the Cambo oil field

New research shines a spotlight on the banks backing Shell and Siccar Point Energy
2021-10-29 | #StopCambo
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

North Sea oil field development shows banks’ hypocrisy over climate

ClientEarth sends letter to 17 banks urging them to stop financing Shell and Siccar Point Energy, the companies pushing for the Cambo oil field
2021-09-14 | ClientEarth
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Banking on Climate Chaos 2021: World’s 60 largest banks have poured USD 3.8 trillion into fossil fuels since Paris Agreement

Even amidst the global economic downturn, fossil fuel financing numbers were higher in 2020 than 2016
2021-03-24 | Nijmegen | BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Banking on Climate Change – Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2020

New report reveals global banks funneled USD 2.7 trillion into fossil fuels Since Paris Climate Agreement, with financing on the rise each year 
2020-03-18 | Nijmegen | BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

UniCredit urged to do the final ‘right thing’ and drop the coal barons

2019-11-27 | Rome, Italy | BankTrack, ReCommon
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Banking on Climate Change – Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2019

World's top banks have poured $1.9 trillion into fossil fuel financing since the Paris Agreement was adopted, with financing on the rise each year
2019-03-20 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack, Honor the Earth, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Sierra Club
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Shell and Gazprom Scrap Dangerous Sub-Arctic Offshore Oil Drilling Platforms

2013-10-18 | Pacific Environment website
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

NGOs seek Sakhalin compensation from Shell, UK banks (Subscription required)

2012-08-01 | Sakhalin Island, Russia | Environmental-Finance
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

WestLB is the first bank to refuse finance to offshore oil rigs in the Arctic

2012-04-20 | Germany | Environmental-Finance
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Oil platform could put critically endangered whales at risk

2011-01-24 | Practical Fishkeeping
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Environmental groups condemn Japanese and French banks for financing Sakhalin II oil and gas project in Russia

2008-06-17 | Tokyo, San Fransisco, Moscow, Nijmegen | Pacific Environment
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Environmental Victory for Sakhalin II

Project sponsor announces it cannot get financing from US and UK Export Credit Agencies
2008-03-04 | London, Washington, Sakhalin | Pacific Environment
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Sakhalin II: new environmental violations brought to light

Banks once more warned for risks of being involved
2007-06-27 | United States of America | Pacific Environment
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Banks urged to back off from Sakhalin II

Sakhalin II crucial test for Equator Principles
2005-07-20 | Utrecht | Pacific Environment
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Russia Banks and Steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Get in touch
Successes Contact BankTrack
Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact us
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin
© BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted