BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Russia
Banks and Steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

New study: Financing for industrial livestock undermines U.S. banks’ climate commitments

Bank of America, Citigroup, and JPMorgan Chase responsible for more than half of the $134 billion in financing examined in the report
2024-04-10 | Washington D.C.
By: Friends of the Earth & Profundo
Contact:

TJ Helmstetter,

 tjhelmstetter@foe.org

Bull in the climate shop report's front cover. Photo: FoE, Profundo
2024-04-10 | Washington D.C.
By: Friends of the Earth & Profundo
Contact:

TJ Helmstetter,

 tjhelmstetter@foe.org

A new study conducted by the Netherlands-based research group Profundo and U.S.-based environmental organization Friends of the Earth examines U.S. banks’ financing of meat, dairy, and feed corporations and the sizable climate impact of that financing.

Between 2016 and 2023, 58 U.S. banks provided $134 billion in lending and underwriting to meat, dairy, animal feed, food processing, and agri-commodity corporations, the report finds. More than half of the financing examined in the report comes from just three major banks: Bank of America (NYSE: BSE), Citigroup (NYSE: C), and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).

The study, titled Bull in the Climate Shop: Industrial Livestock Financing Sabotages Major U.S. Banks’ Climate Commitments, finds that U.S. banks’ lending to meat, dairy and feed corporations results in approximately 11% of the greenhouse gas emissions linked to the banks’ financing. However, these corporations represent just a tiny fraction (0.25%) of the banks’ portfolios — a 44X difference. In other words, this financing presents an outsized impediment to banks meeting their climate commitments.

“Banks have committed to pathways to net zero, but they are ignoring a huge ‘cow-shaped hole’ in their plans,” said Monique Mikhail, lead author of the study and the director of Friends of the Earth’s Agriculture & Climate Finance program. “Big Meat & Dairy exerts a vastly disproportionate impact on the banks’ total emissions, putting their own stated climate commitments at risk.”

“Our research finds that by eliminating their financing of high-emitting corporations involved in meat, dairy, and feed production — a relatively small change in how they allocate their capital — these big banks can affect a sharp emissions reduction,” said Ward Warmerdam, another author of the study and the Senior Financial Researcher at Profundo. “According to our research, defunding industrial livestock production is one of the most climate-positive choices these banks could make.”

The report recommends that U.S. banks:

  • Halt all new financing that enables the expansion of industrial livestock production.
  • Require meat, dairy, and feed clients to disclose third-party verified 1.5°C targets and action plans that align with IPCC or an equivalent science-based sectoral pathway.

Key findings from the study include:

  • Financing of meat, dairy, animal feed, food processing, and agri-commodity corporations has an outsized impact on the Big Three banks’ financed emissions, accounting for just 0.25% of the banks’ total loans outstanding but roughly 11% of reported financed emissions — a 44X difference.
    • Industrial livestock production generates massive GHG emissions: Together, the 56 largest corporations involved in meat, dairy, and/or feed production reviewed for this study generate more carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions (CO2e) each year than the entire nation of Japan, the world’s eighth largest emitter.
    • U.S. bank financing to corporations involved in industrial livestock production has significant climate impacts: U.S. banks financed and facilitated 63.1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions (CO2e) in 2022 via their lending and underwriting to meat, dairy, animal feed, food processing, and agri-commodity corporations.
      • This is roughly the same amount of COe emitted by 14 million cars driven in one year (the same number of cars registered in the state of California).
  • Bank of America, Citigroup, and JPMorgan Chase’s lending and underwriting have led to 24.4 million metric tons of CO2e emissions.
  • Methane impact is worse for warming than CO2: Up to 70% of the 58 U.S. banks’ total meat and dairy related financed and facilitated emissions are methane (using GWP20), which has 80X the warming potential of carbon dioxide. This means reducing methane will have an outsized impact on portfolio emissions.
  • Researchers calculated that meat and dairy corporations’ actual emissions may be up to 4X higher than reported figures.
    • Meat, dairy and feed corporations omit or understate their emissions by millions of tons a year, masking their impact on U.S. banks’ Scope 3 totals.
    • More than half of the corporations assessed in the study do not report emissions at all, and only 22% disclose Scope 3 (value chain) emissions. Scope 3 emissions account for up to 90% of agribusiness corporations’ total carbon footprint.
  • Meat giants, food processing corporations, and agri-commodity traders that supply animal feed are the highest emitters among the Big Three U.S. banks’ livestock value chain clients:
    • Cargill, ADM (NYSE: ADM), Bunge (NYSE: BG) and Nestlé (NSRGY) account for the bulk of financed emissions (Bank of America, 76%; Citigroup, 92%, and JPMorgan Chase, 86%).
    • Bank of America’s underwriting of JBS alone accounted for 87% of its facilitated methane emissions from meat and dairy corporations.

Methodology:

Drawing on information from financial databases, company reports, company publications, company register filings, and media and analyst reports, researchers identified the largest 56 companies by production volume across six industrial livestock subsectors (beef, dairy, pork, poultry, animal feed, and soy trade) and the lending and underwriting services provided to these companies by U.S. banks during the period January 2016 to March 2023.

You can read the full study Bull in the Climate Shop: Industrial Livestock Financing Sabotages Major U.S. Banks Climate Commitments here.

Banks

Bank of America

United States
Active

BNY Mellon

United States
Active

Citi

United States
Active

Goldman Sachs

United States
Active

JPMorgan Chase

United States
Active

Morgan Stanley

United States
Active

PNC

United States
Active

Truist Financial Corporation

United States
Active

U.S. Bancorp

United States
Active

Wells Fargo

United States
Active
Dodgy Deals

JBS

Brazil
Company
active
Industrial Livestock Production | ...

JBS

Brazil
There are no active company profiles for this item now.

Bunge

United States
Company
on record
Agriculture for Palm Oil | ...

Bunge

United States

Cargill

United States
Company
on record
Agriculture for Palm Oil | ...

Cargill

United States

Louis Dreyfus Company

Netherlands
Company
on record
Agriculture for Industrial Crops | ...

Louis Dreyfus Company

Netherlands

Marfrig

Brazil
Company
on record
Industrial Livestock Production | ...

Marfrig

Brazil

Minerva Foods

Brazil
Company
on record
Industrial Livestock Production | ...

Minerva Foods

Brazil

Tyson Foods

United States
Company
on record
Industrial Livestock Production

Tyson Foods

United States
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Russia Banks and Steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin
©2023 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted