BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Russia
Banks and Steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Get in touch
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Global LNG fleet’s annual CO₂e emissions soar past 12 billion tonnes while orderbooks shrug off overcapacity warning

LNG shipping giants continue to ramp up vessel orders despite stranded asset risks, potential decades of carbon lock-in, and a mounting emissions toll
2025-05-13 | Seoul
By: Solutions for Our Climate
Contact:

Antonette Tagnipez,
Communications Officer, 
SFOC,
antonette.tagnipez@forourclimate.org

Briefing: Why LNG Carriers Are a Climate and Financial Risk. Photo: SFOC
2025-05-13 | Seoul
By: Solutions for Our Climate
Contact:

Antonette Tagnipez,
Communications Officer, 
SFOC,
antonette.tagnipez@forourclimate.org

A new report by Solutions for Our Climate (SFOC) reveals that the global fleet of liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers is responsible for enabling approximately 12.7 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions every year, rivaling China’s total annual emissions of 15.9 billion tonnes. The sector’s massive climate footprint is incompatible with the 1.5°C pathway, yet industry players continue to expand their fleets, hurtling towards an overcapacity crisis that threatens both global climate targets and financial stability. 

13803
c12a6344646c4f57863aca90f5913df8.png
center
Figure 1: GHG Emissions Comparison: China 2023 vs LNG Carriers vs US 2023 (Source: China and US country emission data from Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) .
Photo: SFOC

Emissions cover-ups and methane leaks debunk “clean bridge fuel” claims 

The estimated footprint attributed to LNG carriers covers both direct emissions from vessel operations and the far larger enabled emissions across the LNG lifecycle, including stages from extraction, liquefaction and maritime transportation to regasification and final combustion. 

While shipping companies typically disclose operational emissions, they fail to report the much larger lifecycle emissions of the LNG they transport. This creates a significant accountability gap in global greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories.  

Methane leakage accounts for a significant share of total LNG emissions yet remains a major blind spot in industry reporting. Methane, a GHG 80 times more potent than CO₂, can leak throughout the LNG lifecycle, from extraction and liquefaction to potential slips during maritime transport. The emissions from these leaks are widely underreported and undermine the industry’s longstanding claim that LNG is a cleaner “bridge fuel.” When overall emissions are fully accounted for, LNG, in fact, emits more  CO₂ than coal. 

The LNG carrier boom: driven by few, backed by billions  

Despite growing climate concerns and slowing demand projections, the LNG shipping industry is rapidly expanding. The global fleet has tripled to 1,032 vessels since 2014, with an additional 324 under construction and expected to operate for at least 30 years. This surge in orders raises concerns about potential stranded assets and an oversaturated freight market. 

13804
7a921d83e7e04cdcb575b5a3283a5b32.png
center
Figure 2: LNG Carrier Fleet Growth from 2014 to 2025. (Source: Clarkson Data) .
Photo: SFOC

Greece now leads in global LNG ship ownership with 195 carriers, enabling roughly 2.4 billion tonnes of CO₂ emissions annually through the LNG they transport. Japan and China follow with 175 and 112 carriers, respectively. 

Qatar’s Nakilat remains the world’s largest LNG shipowner with 79 vessels, followed closely by Japan’s Mitsui O.S.K. Lines and NYK Lines, Greece’s Angelicoussis Group, and Norway’s Knutsen OAS Shipping. South Korean shipyards (Hanwha Ocean, Hyundai Heavy Industries, and Samsung Heavy Industries) are at the forefront of this building spree, responsible for the construction of nearly 80% of new LNG carriers. 

Big banks and public institutions fueling LNG shipping expansion 

Over the past five years, US$335 billion has been funneled into LNG maritime financing through 175 transactions. Almost 40% of this amount has been funded by just 10 banks, including Mitsubishi UFJ, Mizuho, and JPMorgan Chase. 

13805
0dbfa465628d4b8ba7074e8b1dd30800.png
center
Table 1: Top 10 Banks’ Maritime LNG Related Financing (2019-2024). Source: Stand.earth (2024). Banking on a climate shipwreck.
Photo: SFOC

Strikingly, general-purpose corporate loans (US$65.6B) have surpassed project-specific financing, suggesting that LNG expansion is being propped up through unrestricted capital flows rather than strategic energy investments.  

The South Korean government has emerged as a major public financier, with public support peaking at US$12 billion in 2022. Over the past decade, South Korea has provided US$44.1 billion in public support across 652 financing instances, raising questions about the credibility of its pledge to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and achieve carbon neutrality. 

Rachel Eunbi Shin, SFOC Gas Team Consultant, said: “There’s a clear contradiction – major banks spending billions to finance LNG carriers while simultaneously pledging to reach net zero by 2050. Many of these same institutions have policies not funding upstream and downstream LNG facilities but still fund the ships that transport this fossil fuel. With freight rates at historic lows due to oversupply, building more LNG carriers isn’t just climate-destructive – it’s economically senseless. The International Maritime Organization just approved its Net-Zero Framework at MEPC 83 in April, mandating GHG reductions and fuel levies starting in 2028. The solution to reduce shipping emissions couldn’t be clearer: stop building ships we don’t need.” 

This press release was first published by SFOC here.

Banks

Banco Santander

Spain
Active

Bank of America

United States
Active

Citi

United States
Active

Goldman Sachs

United States
Active

HSBC

United Kingdom
Active

JPMorgan Chase

United States
Active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG)

Japan
Active

Mizuho Financial Group

Japan
Active

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)

Canada
Active

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group

Japan
Active
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Russia Banks and Steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Get in touch
Successes Contact BankTrack
Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact us
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin
© BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted