Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Right-wing attack on sustainable finance is the latest form of climate denial
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
BankTrack welcomes Thun Group paper on banks and human rights
Call for access to remedy for victims bank-financed human rights abuses
Start
Banks

By: BankTrack
2013-10-11
Nijmegen

Contact:
Further information and interviews
Ryan Brightwell: +31 24 3249 220, ryan@banktrack.org
Andreas Missbach: +41 44 277 70 07, amissbach@evb.ch

 


Share this page:

Go to:
Start
Related Banks

Seven leading international banks, informally grouped together as the ‘Thun Group of Banks', last week presented a discussion paper for banks on the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

BankTrack welcomes the discussion paper as a significant step towards recognising the relevance of human rights to banks' core business, but regrets that the Thun Group has not addressed all relevant areas of the UN Guiding Principles. As such, it calls on the banking sector to finally recognise its responsibility to provide adequate complaint and remedy mechanisms to people suffering human rights abuses as a result of bank-financed activities.

This discussion paper from the Thun Group - which now includes Barclays, BBVA, Credit Suisse, ING Bank, RBS Group, UBS AG and UniCredit - is the result of two years of deliberations, and follows the universal adoption of the UN Guiding Principles by the Human Rights Council in 2011.

The paper significantly recognizes that the UN Guiding Principles apply to all parts of a bank's business, including asset management and personal banking as well as corporate and investment banking.  It also makes an important contribution as a guide to the banking sector for operationalizing the UN Principles, elaborating on policy and governance frameworks for banks, and providing guidance on the scope and content of due diligence procedures for different financial services.

Andreas Missbach of the Swiss NGO Berne Declaration, which launched the banksandhumanrights.ch website in 2010 to lobby Swiss banks to improve their human rights policy and practice, said: "We welcome the fact that the banks for the first time recognize the relevance of human rights in their core business, and are therefore discussing the necessary adjustments to their due diligence processes. It is now crucial that this discussion document translates into real implementation, with transparent reporting on progress."

Access to remedy missing

However, the paper is disappointingly limited in its scope, focusing only on Principles 16-21 as "those which are most relevant to banks' potential adverse impacts on human rights and tend to be most challenging to implement". No explanation is given as to why the paper omits principles clearly directed towards businesses, including those in section 3 of the Principles, ‘Access to Remedy'. The paper ignores principles calling on companies (including banks) to "establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted", and to "provide for or cooperate in" remediation where they have caused or contributed to human rights abuses (Principles 22 and 29).

"The discussion of financial institution responsibility to respect human rights is a welcome and necessary development. However, the discussion is empty without inclusion of the responsibility to ensure access to remedy," said Komala Ramachandra at Accountability Counsel, which assists communities around the world to defend their environmental and human rights. "Transparent, effective, and legitimate avenues for addressing and remediating human rights violations, are critical to building a meaningful system to avoid and address risks discussed in the paper,"

"BankTrack has long called for banks to establish mechanisms that would allow rights holders whose rights are violated by bank clients or bank financed projects access to remedy with the banks themselves", said Johan Frijns, BankTrack coordinator. "The Thun group seems to have deliberately left this crucial part of the human rights obligations of banks out of the discussion paper, a huge missed chance to assist banks in moving forward on this long neglected obligation."

ENDS

The statement and paper by the Thun Group of Banks can be found on the www.business-humanrights.org website.

In December 2013, BankTrack expanded on its criticisms of the Thun Group discussion paper in a more detailed response paper, here.

Notes for editors
The full text of the UN Guiding Principles is available here. BankTrack's submission on the drafting of the Principles, "Human Rights responsibilities of private sector banks", is here.
banksandhumanrights.ch
See page 5 of the Thun Group Discussion Paper

Go to:
Start
Related Banks

Related banks

Barclays United Kingdom

active

BBVA Spain

active

Credit Suisse Switzerland

active

ING Netherlands

active

NatWest Group United Kingdom

active

UBS Switzerland

active

UniCredit Italy

active
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted