Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › Blog
Gulf Coast communities fighting the massive buildout of fracked gas exports
A Banking on Climate Chaos 2022 case study
Start
Banks
Dodgy Deals

By: BankTrack, Rainforest Action Network & Sierra Club
2022-04-05

Share this page:

Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass LNG Export terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana . Photo: Photo: Julie Dermansky, flight provided by SouthWings
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

The Gulf Coast is the region in the southern United States which borders the Gulf of Mexico. For generations, the oil and gas industry has polluted the air, land, and water, undermining the health and safety of Gulf Coast communities, repressing efforts by local activists to resist further development, and cementing the stranglehold of extractive industry in the region. Across the Gulf Coast, communities — disproportionately communities of color — face the additional and increasing burdens of climate-driven natural disasters, like hurricanes and flooding, which are exacerbated by the emissions from those same dirty fossil fuel industries.

Building on years of growth in the region, fossil fuel companies have continued their destruction in communities along the Gulf Coast. Nearly 20 new and expanded export facilities are currently proposed to liquefy and ship fracked gas (known as LNG) from Texas and Louisiana to foreign markets. Today, there are seven fully operational LNG export facilities in the United States. If the fossil fuel companies get their way, that number will increase to 33 in the next few years, with 25 located in the Gulf of Mexico alone.

These new projects pose a severe threat to Gulf Coast communities who already bear the burden of decades of industrial pollution and environmental racism. These projects would exacerbate the negative health impacts that frontline communities face, exposing them to more toxic pollutants and degrading air and water quality in surrounding areas.

Expanding gas export facilities in the Gulf would make it nearly impossible to avert the worst consequences of the climate crisis. In fact, if the 18 proposed new or expanded gas export facilities in the Gulf Coast were to be completed, they would add nearly 1.5 billion metric tons of greenhouse gasses per year. This is equivalent to the annual emissions from over 320 million cars or over 370 coal plants.

The Gulf Coast is home to many threatened and endangered species including ocelots and the Rice’s whale. New and expanded gas export projects would threaten habitat for these species and many others by destroying acres of sensitive marshes, critical wetlands, and coastal prairies. This destruction would also threaten the livelihoods of communities dependent on tourism.

Despite the clear dangers, and commitments by major banks to reduce financed emissions, many have continued to pour money into the expansion of gas export projects, directly enabling the pollution of communities and destruction of ecosystems along the Gulf Coast. The six largest US banks alone — JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs — have poured US$ billion into LNG from 2016-2021. By far the worst among them in this sector is Morgan Stanley, which is the world’s largest banker of LNG, and has poured US$ 13 billion into LNG projects and companies since 2016, 55% more than the second-place bank.

Photo: Rebekah Hinojosa, Sierra Club

But Gulf Coast communities have been fighting back. From the Rio Grande Valley in Texas to Lake Charles, Louisiana and so many other places along the Gulf Coast, frontline leaders have organized their communities to resist these projects every step of the way. Despite powerful opposition from fossil fuel companies and their financial backers, Gulf Coast communities will not allow their homes to become sacrifice zones.

In March, 120 organizations sent letters to the six biggest American banks urging them to stop lending and support for new and expanded gas export facilities, citing environmental justice and climate concerns as well as rising home heating costs for American communities being driven by the rise in exports. You can make your voice heard too: Tell America’s largest banks not to fund dangerous new fracked gas exports.

Featured in Banking on Climate Chaos 2022

Published in March 2022, the Banking on Climate Chaos report assesses big banks' financing for fossil fuels. The report features a selection of case studies that highlight how this financing harms local communities, who are fighting back. The case studies tell the story of how these projects put the health and safety of local communities at risk, noting the top companies and just a few of the banks in this report’s scope that are supporting each destructive project. Learn more about these case studies directly from the impacted communities here.

Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related banks

Bank of America United States

active

Citi United States

active

Goldman Sachs United States

active

JPMorgan Chase United States

active

Morgan Stanley United States

active

Wells Fargo United States

active
Go to:
Start
Related Banks
Related Dodgy Deals

Related Dodgy Deals

Projects

active

Rio Grande LNG Terminal United States

LNG Terminal
There are no projects active for this item now.
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted