Banks| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2021-02-24 00:00:00
Protect the climate but finance Total?
2021-02-16 00:00:00
Oil and gas financiers are staring down the barrel at $1 trillion in losses: time to rein in support for new pipelines
2021-02-11 00:00:00
Beefing up risk: the exposure of JBS’ financiers to financial, regulatory and reputational risks
2021-01-25 00:00:00
Why should banks support EU mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence?
2020-09-24 12:53:20
Oscislowo open-pit coal mine cancelled
2020-09-08 13:07:41
Strengthened OECD guidance on responsible banking
2020-02-25 10:35:27
JPMorgan Chase Coal and Arctic Policy a step forward but fails to match its climate responsibility as the world’s #1 Fossil Bank
2020-02-18 17:27:23
Civil society groups welcome Royal Bank of Scotland preparing to exit fossil fuels
Connect
2021-02-01 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice
2020-11-30 00:00:00
Soft Commitments, Hard Lessons: an analysis of the Soft Commodities Compact
2020-11-24 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II
2020-11-18 00:00:00
Crude Risk: Risks to banks and investors from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline
2020-09-16 00:00:00
Principles for Paris-Aligned Financial Institutions: Climate Impact, Fossil Fuels and Deforestation
2020-08-17 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part I
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Home › Projects
Cernavoda nuclear power plant (units 3 & 4) Romania
About
Financiers
Companies
Impacts
Brief history
Documents
News
Media
Updates

On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date

Send feedback on this profile
Download as PDF
By: BankTrack
Created before Nov 2016
Last update: 2016-10-06 23:32:29

Contact:

Jan Haverkamp, Greenpeace International, Czech Republic


Share this page:

Sectors Nuclear Electric Power Generation
Location

About Cernavoda nuclear power plant (units 3 & 4)

The plans to build Romania's Cernavoda nuclear power plant are old - they were part of an energy policy devised by the dictator Nicolae Ceaucescu who was deposed in 1989 and wanted to build five reactors. The Cernavoda 3 and 4 reactors are based on the Canadian CANDU6 design which, according to the Western European Nuclear Regulators Association, has not changed since 1979. There are big question marks over the reactor's safety which shares the same design flaw as the reactor which caused the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.

Construction on reactors 2, 3, 4, and 5 was halted at Cernavoda in 1991 to concentrate on reactor 1, which was commissioned in 1996 almost 20 years after negotiations first started, costing the state $2.2 billion. Cernavoda 2, commissioned in October 2007, was the last nuclear power station to start operation in Europe. Cernavoda 3 and 4 are not expected to start operation until 2014 and 2015 at the earliest.

Nuclearelectrica, the state run owner and operator, says the project will cost about 4 billion euros. As with nearly all nuclear reactor projects, that estimate will almost certainly rise and quickly. The Romanian government is aware of the financial risks involved. In order to keep the six strategic investors happy, it has put extensive state aid into the project. The Government has made a guarantee of EUR 220 million, an EUR 350 million subsidy for 855 tons of heavy water, and contributed EUR 800 million from the National Development Fund. CEE Bankwatch and Greenpeace have complained about this state aid to the European Commission.

After all this, the two new reactors will not even be used to supply electricity to Romanian consumers. They will instead export electricity to neighbouring countries.

Latest developments

2009-06-28 05:10:28

What must happen

Banks should refuse to provide capital for this project or for Electronuclear or any of the strategic investors, as the project does not work with state of the art nuclear technology (a 2nd generation reactor design), has unacceptable effects on the environment (e.g. tritium emissions), and goes counter the development of a sustainable energy policy for Romania.

Impacts

Social and human rights impacts

Cernavoda is a small town of slightly more than 20,000 residents in the southeast of Romania located on the Danube River, not far from the Black Sea. Cernavoda 1 and 2 produce approximately 18% of Romania's electricity. Water from the Danube is used for cooling the reactor. Traces of tritium, a radioactve isotope of hydrogen, have been found in the water that is released back into the river from the reactor.

Recommendations have been made to relocate pregnant women and mothers with very young children, and local residents have been advised not to eat produce grown in local gardens.

During the Environmental Impact Assessment of Cernavoda 3 and 4, Greenpeace organised a presentation of a report by Dr. Ian Fairlie into tritium emissions from the existing reactors. During the presentation in the town hall in Cernavoda, the state owned operator Nuclearelectrica disrupted the meeting and used intrusive surveillance on Dr. Fairlie and the Greenpeace team. All attendants at the meeting were registered by taking in their ID cards at the entrance of the town hall. Local human rights activists criticised the resulting lack of opportunity for local inhabitants to discuss the findings presented by Dr. Fairlie freely. Romanian law clearly assigns responsibility for the safe operation of the reactors to the operator, Nuclearelectrica.

Clearly, pregnant women and children up to 4 years old are more vulnerable to the high tritium emissions of CANDU 6 reactors. This risk of exposure will become even higher should the two new planned reactors come on stream.

Environmental and climate impacts

The level of tritium emitted from the CANDU6 reactors will increase to unacceptable levels if reactor 3 and 4 are permitted to upgrade. On average 60% of tritium releases occur in the Danube and 75% in the atmosphere.

The power station is located in an area that is seismic active (the Vrancha breach) which has seen heavy earthquakes in recent history. An earthquake in 1977 destroyed much of the Romanian capital Bucharest and caused damage in the area surrounding of Cernavoda. The CANDU 6 reactor also lacks sufficient protection against terrorist attack.

Other impacts

The Romanian Government is aware of the financial risks involved in this project. In order to convince the six strategic investors, they decided to put extensive state aid into the project, but did not sufficiently realise this will be in breach with European state aid regulations.

The Government decided to grant a government guarantee for 220 Million Euro, a subsidy for 855 tons of heavy water for the sum of 350 Million Euro and 800 Million Euro from the National Development Fund, from which 20 Million Euro is to be allocated in 2009. CEE Bankwatch and Greenpeace have complained about this state aid to the European Commission.

Governance

Updates

2009-06-28 05:10:28

The Environmental Impact Assessment of the Cernavoda 3,4 is currently in its final stages.

The Romanian government is looking for possible financial models for the project. A government decision including government loan guarantees, subsidies for heavy water and direct investment from the government budget structural funds had to be reconsidered, as they would constitute illegal state aid.

Financiers

unknown which banks will finance

Related companies

AECL Canada

ArcelorMittal Luxembourg

CEZ Group Czech Republic show profile

Coal Mining | Nuclear Electric Power Generation | Coal Electric Power Generation

Electrabel Belgium

ENEL Italy

EnergoNuclear S.A. Romania

Nuclearelectrica Romania

News

| |
Type:
Year:
blog
external news
our news

Romania seeks Chinese boost for nuke plant

2011-08-19 | Beijing | upi.com
blog
external news
our news

Crisis Throws Romania’s Nuclear Project into Doubt

2011-01-26 | Romania | Balkan Insight
blog
external news
our news

BankTrack calls on banks to stop funding nuclear power

New website exposes nuclear secrets of commercial banks
2010-05-26 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack
blog
external news
our news

Cernavoda nuclear reactor too dangerous to build, says new report

Greenpeace calls on Romanian government to shelve the project
2009-03-10 | Bucharest | Greenpeace International
blog
external news
our news

Greenpeace files illegal state aid complaint for construction of nuclear plants in Romania and Bulgaria

2009-02-25 | Brussels | Friends of the Earth Europe
blog
external news
our news

Greenpeace study warns Cernavoda inhabitants of tritium dangers from nuclear power plant

Environmental group demands the Romanian Government to look at sustainable alternatives to nuclear power
2007-10-31 | Bucharest | Greenpeace International

Documents

Type:
Year:
ngo documents
2011-01-26 00:00:00

Briefing: RWE and Cernavoda

2011-01-26 00:00:00 | Heffa Schücking, urgewald
ngo documents
2009-03-10 00:00:00

Greenpeace recommendations on Cernavoda

2009-03-10 00:00:00 | Greenpeace International
correspondence
2009-02-20 00:00:00

Letter from Greenpeace International to EU commission Directorate General Competition on Cernavoda

2009-02-20 00:00:00 | Greenpeace International
ngo documents
2008-11-01 00:00:00

Risks of Operating Candu 6 Nuclear Power Plants: Gentilly Unit 2 Refurbishment and its Global Implications

2008-11-01 00:00:00 | Greenpeace International
ngo documents
2007-09-25 00:00:00

Cernavodă 3 şi 4: Evaluarea Impactului asupra Mediului: Raport pentru Greenpeace

2007-09-25 00:00:00 | Dr. Ian Fairlie
ngo documents
2007-09-10 00:00:00

Cernavoda 3 and 4: Environment Impact Analysis: Report for Greenpeace

2007-09-10 00:00:00 | Dr Ian Fairlie
ngo documents
2007-07-06 00:00:00

Tritium Hazard Report: Pollution and Radiation Risk from Canadian Nuclear Facilities, Toronto (2007) Greenpeace Canada

2007-07-06 00:00:00 | Greenpeace International

Media




Brief history

The Cernavoda nuclear power plant stems from the 1980s energy plans of communist dictator Nicolae Ceaucescu, who wanted to make his country completely energy independent from others. These plans included the big dam project of the Iron Gate II, big dam projects in the Danube at Turnu Magurele and Silistra, large hydro projects in the Carpathian mountains and ambitious wind energy plans in the Danube Delta. Of these, only several hydro projects in the Carpaths and the Iron Gate II project in the Danube were finished.

After the revolution of 1990, the Cernavoda project was halted, but shortly afterward, construction of unit 1 continued, coming on-line on 11 July 1996. After this, construction of Cernavoda 2 was also restarted, which came on line on 7 August 2007.

In the early 2000s, plans to finish construction of units 3 and 4 resurfaced.

Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted