BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
20 years of BankTrack – Our history
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-09-18 00:00:00
New report and blog: Barclays' bond with Adani
2023-08-23 00:00:00
Decarbonization: steel not making the cut
2023-07-27 00:00:00
Two months ago 62 organizations and 3 Goldman Environmental Prize winners wrote an Open Letter to the TNFD: No one responded
2023-07-13 00:00:00
The Sustainable Steel Principles: One step forward when leaps are needed
2023-09-15 17:34:10
The number of major banks refusing to support EACOP reaches 24
2023-07-31 14:30:01
Equator Principles recognise projects’ risk to climate for the first time
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
Connect
2023-09-18 00:00:00
Barclays' bond with Adani
2023-06-26 00:00:00
How should financiers align with the Global Biodiversity Framework? Five Key Principles
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
End Coal Finance
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Banks and steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack 20 years of BankTrack – Our history Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Cernavoda nuclear reactor too dangerous to build, says new report

Greenpeace calls on Romanian government to shelve the project
2009-03-10 | Bucharest
By: Greenpeace International
Contact:

Shawn-Patrick Stensil, Greenpeace Canada energy campaigner, 416 884 7053, shawn.patrick.stensil@greenpeace.org

Jan Haverkamp, Greenpeace EU policy campaigner, +32 477 790 416, jan.haverkamp@greenpeace.org (English)

Crisanta Lungu, Greenpeace energy campaigner, Romania, +40 720 544 000, crisanta.lungu@greenpeace.ro

 

2009-03-10 | Bucharest
By: Greenpeace International
Contact:

Shawn-Patrick Stensil, Greenpeace Canada energy campaigner, 416 884 7053, shawn.patrick.stensil@greenpeace.org

Jan Haverkamp, Greenpeace EU policy campaigner, +32 477 790 416, jan.haverkamp@greenpeace.org (English)

Crisanta Lungu, Greenpeace energy campaigner, Romania, +40 720 544 000, crisanta.lungu@greenpeace.ro

 

Greenpeace is calling on Romania to abandon its plans to build two new Candu-6 reactors at Cernovoda in response to a recently released Greenpeace commissioned report that finds the Canadian reactor design is unsafe and too dangerous to build according to modern safety standards.

“The Cernavoda reactors do not meet modern standards. The Romanian Government and the project companies must abandon their plans to proceed with the construction of Cernavoda 3 and 4," said Crisanta Lungu, an energy campaigner with Greenpeace in Romania.

The report, "The Risks of Operating Candu 6 Nuclear Power Plants" was presented to the press in Romania today during a press conference with videolinks to Canada and the USA. It warns that countries like Romania wanting to construct CANDU-6 reactors would have to forgo thorough safety reviews. These include standards intended to prevent catastrophic radiation releases from terrorist attacks or accidents.

The study, carried out by Dr. Gordon R. Thompson of the Institute for Resource and Security Studies in Massachusetts, USA, highlights a litany of problems with the CANDU-6 design, including:

  • The same design flaw that contributed to the Chernobyl explosion and to the world’s first nuclear accident in 1952 at AECL´s Chalk River laboratories. This design flaw does not meet modern safety standards.
  • The CANDU-6 would not resist a terrorist attack and would not meet post-9/11 safety standards.
  • The occurrence of external events like earthquakes, quite common in this part of Romania, are not taken sufficiently into account in risk calculations for CANDU-6 reactors.
  • Its emergency shut-down systems are untested and unproven. Confidence in the ability of these systems to operate in accident situations is low.
  • Its use of natural uranium and online fueling makes it attractive to countries hoping to acquire the capacity to divert plutonium from used fuel to build atomic weapons. India used a Canadian reactor to build an atomic bomb; AECL stated late last year it would like to sell additional reactors to India and is using possible construction of CANDU-6 reactors in Cernavoda as marketing argument for its international sales.

Based on Dr. Thompson’s findings, Greenpeace is recommending full risk assessments before the licensing and construction of the reactors is permitted and a formal request for such assessments to the Romanian government, Romanian Nuclear Regulatory Agency, the European Commission, the companies involved in the construction of Cernavoda 3 and 4.

"Because the CANDU-6 shares a fatal design flaw with the Chernobyl reactors, safety regulators in the Germany and the USA would never allow it to be built. If Romania continues the construction of Cernavoda 3 and 4, it clearly considers its population to be second class citizens that can be served with a second class nuclear power station," said Jan Haverkamp, nuclear energy expert for Greenpeace Europe.

Greenpeace notes that Canadian province of Ontario, the birthplace of the CANDU-6 design, abandoned its plan to build a new CANDU-6 in 2006 because of the design changes required for the CANDU-6 to meet modern standards. "In a post September 11th, post Chernobyl world, Canada should not export a reactor deemed too dangerous to build here at home," Shawn-Patrick Stensil, Greenpeace energy campaigner in Canada.

The report was written by Gordon Thompson, a nuclear expert and professor at Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. He was educated in Australia and the UK, in engineering and science, obtaining his doctorate from Oxford University in 1973.

Last month, Greenpeace Europe filed a complaint on with the European Commission over alleged illegal state aid for the construction of additional CANDU-6 reactors at Cernavoda.

 

NOTES TO THE EDITOR:

The project companies involved in the construction plans of Cernavoda 3 and 4 are the 100% state owned Romanian utility SN Nuclearelectrica A.S., GdF Suez / Electrabel from France, RWE from Germany, CEZ from the Czech Republic, ENEL from Italy, Iberdrola from Spain and Arcelor-Mital from India.

 

Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Cernavoda nuclear power plant (units 3 & 4)

Romania
Project
On record
Nuclear Electric Power Generation

Cernavoda nuclear power plant (units 3 & 4)

Romania
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 10540
    [item_id] => 309
    [item_table] => ci_companyprofiles
    [position] => 0
    [link_id] => 875073
    [_table] => ci_images
    [_type] => cover
    [_data] => 
    [_visible] => 1
    [tag] => 
    [title] => 
    [file] => engieheadofficeladefenseparis_crop.jpg
    [description] => Engie's head office at La Defense, Paris
    [ownership] => Google Earth/Streetview
    [filetype] => 
    [hidden] => 0
    [croporig] => 10539
    [cropdata] => {"x":0,"y":25.139534883720934,"w":1081,"h":608.0624999999924,"targ_w":1081,"targ_h":608.0624999999924,"r":4.189922480620155}
    [tags] => 
    [rights] => 0
    [updated_at] => 2021-12-14 11:34:25
    [created_at] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00
    [dimension] => 
    [mime] => 
    [16:9] => 1
    [210:297] => 0
    [border] => 0
)

ENGIE

France
Company
active
Coal Electric Power Generation | ...

ENGIE

France
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 8003
    [item_id] => 36
    [item_table] => ci_companyprofiles
    [position] => 0
    [link_id] => 874266
    [_table] => ci_images
    [_type] => cover
    [_data] => 
    [_visible] => 1
    [tag] => 
    [title] => 
    [file] => garzweiler_2_crop.jpg
    [description] => Garzweiler II, RWE's surface mine in North-Rhine-Westfalia
    [ownership] => Bert Kaufmann via Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
    [filetype] => 
    [hidden] => 0
    [croporig] => 8002
    [cropdata] => {"x":236.72093023256,"y":0,"w":6546.3565891474,"h":3682.3255813953,"targ_w":1500,"targ_h":843.74999999999,"r":26.302325581395}
    [tags] => 
    [rights] => 0
    [updated_at] => 2021-07-12 16:06:01
    [created_at] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00
    [dimension] => 
    [mime] => 
    [16:9] => 1
    [210:297] => 0
    [border] => 0
)

RWE

Germany
Company
active
Coal Electric Power Generation | ...

RWE

Germany
There are no active company profiles for this item now.
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 8673
    [item_id] => 464
    [item_table] => ci_companyprofiles
    [position] => 0
    [link_id] => 365232
    [_table] => ci_images
    [_type] => cover
    [_data] => 
    [_visible] => 1
    [tag] => 
    [title] => 
    [file] => streetview_crop.jpg
    [description] => 
    [ownership] => 
    [filetype] => 
    [hidden] => 0
    [croporig] => 8672
    [cropdata] => {"x":0,"y":0,"w":1091,"h":613.6874999999924,"targ_w":1091,"targ_h":613.6874999999924,"r":4.228682170542636}
    [tags] => 
    [rights] => 0
    [updated_at] => 2019-08-27 13:04:31
    [created_at] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00
    [dimension] => 
    [mime] => 
    [16:9] => 1
    [210:297] => 0
    [border] => 0
)

CEZ Group

Czech Republic
Company
on record
Coal Electric Power Generation | Coal Mining | Nuclear Electric Power Generation

CEZ Group

Czech Republic
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA End Coal Finance Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Banks and steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack 20 years of BankTrack – Our history Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2023 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted