BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Russia
Banks and Steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles 20 years of BankTrack – Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Nippon Steel’s coal focus a risk for investors

2025-05-08 | Tokyo
By: SteelWatch
Work partners:
SteelWatch
Contact:

Roger Smith, SteelWatch Asia Lead

Mikiko Ishii, Japan Campaign Officer, SteelWatch, +81 90 8381 4328

Nippon Steel Kimitsu Works, 2007. Photo: Takato Marui via Wikimedia (CC 2.0)
2025-05-08 | Tokyo
By: SteelWatch
Work partners:
SteelWatch
Contact:

Roger Smith, SteelWatch Asia Lead

Mikiko Ishii, Japan Campaign Officer, SteelWatch, +81 90 8381 4328

SteelWatch’s Nippon Steel Corporate Climate Assessment 2025 (1) shows that despite the company having many opportunities globally to pursue near-zero emissions iron and steelmaking, its leadership is stuck in an outdated coal-based production mentality that is unfit for the global company they want to build.

Nippon Steel currently consumes approximately 25 million tonnes of coal annually, and has investments in coal mines with a total annual production capacity of 69 million tonnes. Its recent acquisition of a 20% interest in the Blackwater coal mine adds an additional 10 million tonnes of annual supply capacity, which gives Nippon Steel a comparable coal footprint to pure coal companies, such as BHP Mitsubishi Alliance with its 60 million annual tonnes.

Nippon Steel’s existing 2030 decarbonisation target (-30%) was already significantly less than Japan’s national one (-46%) when it was set in 2021, and the national target has now been increased to a 60% cut in GHG emissions by 2035, rising to 73% by 2040 compared with 2013 levels. The company’s flagship Super COURSE50 technology is only expected to be able to reach 50% reductions in the 2040s at the earliest. This leaves the company falling well short of its climate responsibilities, and indicates that it intends to continue coal use indefinitely.

“With its focus on technology to only partially reduce emissions at coal-based production facilities, its increasingly large investments in Australian coal mines, and its promise to prolong blast furnace production at U. S. Steel plants during its acquisition bid, Nippon Steel is looking more and more like a coal company that also makes steel,” said Roger Smith, Asia Lead at SteelWatch. “Nippon Steel’s assurances that it is committed to decarbonisation will ring hollow until it aligns its climate targets with the 1.5C limit and announces transformative plans for a complete phase out of coal-based production. There is tremendous potential to replace coal by investing in green iron supply chains in regions with abundant renewable energy, such as Australia and Canada.”

Right now Nippon Steel is attempting to satisfy growing demand for green steel with accounting tricks, self-certifying coal-based steel as “green” (2). It has ignored shareholder calls for greater action on climate change (3), and is overdue on an update to its climate plans. More stringent interim targets and greater implementation of low-emissions technologies in the 2030s will be necessary to keep it in line with investor expectations and global competitors. (4)

Notes:

  1. SteelWatch’s 2025 Corporate Climate Assessment of Nippon Steel
    https://steelwatch.org/reports/nscca2025/
  2. Nippon Steel’s approach to low-emissions steel certification is “mass balance,” a method of allocating carbon reductions from production to products manufactured through high-emissions processes, labeling them as “green steel”. This risks delaying a genuine transition by devaluing steel actually produced using decarbonised processes and underscores the need for greater transparency and traceability in product-level emissions accounting.
    https://steelwatch.org/commentary/steelwatch-comment-on-proposed-revisions-to-japans-act-on-promoting-green-procurement/
  3. At Nippon Steel’s 100th annual general meeting in June 2024, its shareholders voted for the first time on three resolutions demanding a strengthening of the company’s climate strategy and policies. The following Proposals 1 and 2 were co-filed by the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) and the Corporate Action Japan (CAJ), while the Proposal 3 was co-filed by one of Europe’s largest asset managers, Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) and ACCR. The three proposals achieved the following results:
    1. Proposal 1: More ambitious emissions reduction targets – 21.48% support
      Nippon Steel to set and disclose short and medium-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets aligned to the goals of the Paris Agreement for scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions; along with disclosure of planned capex for decarbonisation investments.
    2. Proposal 2: Executive remuneration linked to emissions reductions – 23.01% support
      Link executive compensation to the achievement of the company’s GHG emissions reduction targets.
    3. Proposal 3: Improve climate-related lobbying disclosure – 27.98% support
      Disclose climate-related policy positions and lobbying activities, including direct lobbying and industry association memberships, and review of these for alignment with the Company’s goal of carbon neutrality by 2050.

Nippon Steel’s Board of Directors expressed opposition to the shareholder proposals, maintaining the stance that the company’s current efforts are adequate.

  1. SteelWatch Explainer: Why green iron trade will catalyse steel industry decarbonisation https://steelwatch.org/steelwatch-explainers/steelwatch-explainer-why-green-iron-trade-will-catalyse-steel-industry-decarbonisation/

This item was originally posted on SteelWatch's website here.

Banks

Bank of America

United States
Active

Goldman Sachs

United States
Active

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG)

Japan
Active

Mizuho Financial Group

Japan
Active

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group

Japan
Active
Dodgy Deals

Nippon Steel

Japan
Company
active
Iron and Steel Manufacturing | ...

Nippon Steel

Japan
There are no active company profiles for this item now.
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Russia Banks and Steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles 20 years of BankTrack – Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Visit us
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin
©2023 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted