BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › BankTrack news ›
BankTrack News

BankTrack’s Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022 to be published in November

52 large global banks received draft assessment of their human rights policies
2022-07-21 | The Hague, Netherlands
By: Giulia Barbos – BankTrack
Contact:

Giulia Barbos, Human Rights Researcher & Campaigner at BankTrack

The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark 2019; cover image. Photo: BankTrack
2022-07-21 | The Hague, Netherlands
By: Giulia Barbos – BankTrack
Contact:

Giulia Barbos, Human Rights Researcher & Campaigner at BankTrack

BankTrack’s Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022 is on track to be published in November 2022, with the first draft analysis of the human rights policies of 52 of the largest commercial banks around the world just concluded. BankTrack has now shared the draft scores with all banks covered in the benchmark, offering them the opportunity to provide feedback on their scores in the coming weeks.

The 2022 benchmark will be the fourth time BankTrack has assessed global banks on their alignment with the United Nations’ human rights rules for business, the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). It also follows the publication of regional human rights benchmarks for banks headquartered in Africa and Asia, published in 2021 and 2022 respectively.

The UNGPs were unanimously endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council in June 2011 and provide the global authoritative standard on the human rights responsibilities of business. Last year, on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the UNGPs, the UN published two reports, the first taking stock of the first decade, and the second setting out a roadmap for the next decade of business and human rights.

The stocktaking report noted that “movement is slow among financial sector actors”, and that “while there are signs of some progress among some actors, others are hardly moving.” BankTrack’s last Global Human Rights Benchmark, published in 2019, was cited as one of the studies evidencing this slow progress.

In setting out its roadmap for the next decade, the UN highlighted the need to raise the ambition and increase the pace of realising business respect for human rights. It also set out specific goals aimed at the financial sector.

Financial institutions – including private sector commercial banks, institutional investors, development finance institutions, and other sources of financial capital – should:

  • Adopt human rights policies and embed human rights due diligence and develop grievance management approaches in line with the UNGPs in their own governance frameworks and in the investment decision-making process.
  • Engage investees in constructive dialogue to promote: (1) the adoption of human rights policies, governance, due diligence and effective grievance mechanisms and (2) the provision of remedy for victims of human rights abuse where the investee has caused or contributed to adverse human rights impacts.
  • Publicly disclose how the institution is addressing salient human rights risks and impacts connected with investment activities.

From the UNGPs+10 Roadmap.

BankTrack’s 2022 Global Human Rights Benchmark will show whether the speed of progress has picked up following the disappointing 2019 results, and whether banks have made progress on the significant gaps that previous research identified. These include ensuring affected people are consulted in human rights due diligence; reporting on specific impacts identified and the banks’ efforts to address them; and providing access to remedy for those affected by bank finance, for example through a grievance mechanism.

Banks will be assessed against 14 criteria across four categories assessing their human rights policies; due diligence processes; their reporting on human rights impacts; and approach to remedying adverse impacts. They will receive a full score (1), half score (0.5) or no score (0) for each category, leading to a total score of between 0 and 14.

In addition, banks will be assessed on their responses to specific allegations of human rights violations, where community groups and their allies have written to banks seeking action. These “response tracking” scores are already embedded into BankTrack’s bank profiles.

An overview of the assessment criteria and a list of the banks to be assessed is published here.

Bank representatives from the 52 banks in scope which have not heard from us are kindly invited to contact Giulia Barbos at giulia@banktrack.org.

Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted