Banks| Dodgy Deals| Map| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2020-12-22 00:00:00
Blog: In 2020, the Equator Principles struggle to remain relevant
2020-12-14 00:00:00
The battle to stop Line 3 is heating up on the ground and across the US
2020-12-14 00:00:00
Corporate accountability and the just transition: Frameworks for holding corporations accountable for climate change
2020-12-12 00:00:00
Five years since the Paris Agreement, are banks' 2050 pledges enough to reign in fossil fuel finance?
2020-09-24 12:53:20
Oscislowo open-pit coal mine cancelled
2020-09-08 13:07:41
Strengthened OECD guidance on responsible banking
2020-02-25 10:35:27
JPMorgan Chase Coal and Arctic Policy a step forward but fails to match its climate responsibility as the world’s #1 Fossil Bank
2020-02-18 17:27:23
Civil society groups welcome Royal Bank of Scotland preparing to exit fossil fuels
Connect
2020-11-30 00:00:00
Soft Commitments, Hard Lessons: an analysis of the Soft Commodities Compact
2020-11-24 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II
2020-11-18 00:00:00
Crude Risk: Risks to banks and investors from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline
2020-09-16 00:00:00
Principles for Paris-Aligned Financial Institutions: Climate Impact, Fossil Fuels and Deforestation
2020-08-17 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part I
2020-03-18 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Change - Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2020
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Home › News
Swiss bank fined $536mln for Burma ties -
Democratic Voice of Burma
Start
Banks

2009-12-17
Norway

Share this page:

Normal 0 21

A Swiss banking giant has been fined $US536 million after being found guilty of violating US sanctions through years of undetected transactions with so-called "rogue" regimes, such as Burma.  

US prosecutors alleged that Credit Suisse, Switzerland's largest bank, had carried out thousands of secret transactions with Iran, Sudan, Libya, and Cuba, as well as Burma. These were done through US banks to avoid detection.  

The bank's falsifying of the records of New York-based financial institutions allowed the five countries, all of which are subject to tough US economic blockades, "to access the US financial system in violation of US sanctions", Manhattan district attorney Robert M. Morgenthau said.  

A statement released by US attorney general Eric Holder accused the bank of "massive financial misconduct" that was "astounding...in both its scope and complexity".  

"For more than a decade, Credit Suisse did business with and for countries that the United States had specifically banned from our financial systems," he said. "But rather than adhere to the law and decline to serve these customers, Credit Suisse established a business model to allow these rogue players access to US dollars."

According to attorney reports, between 2002 and 2006 the bank processed over $US700 million in payments that violated sanctions, although it is unclear what proportion of these related to Burma.

In the case of Iran, Holder said that the company had developed a pamphlet for Iranian clients "explaining how to fill out payment messages so as not to trigger US filters". The majority of the transactions exposed in the court case involved Iran.

The bank told Reuters on Tuesday, prior to the verdict, that it was "conducting an internal review into certain US dollar payments involving countries, persons or entities that may be subject to US economic sanctions".

The US treasury department in a statement yesterday strongly condemned the apparent "awareness of the conduct within the bank".

Marc Dosch, press officer at Credit Suisse's Zurich headquarters, told DVB  today that "there have been clear mistakes; that is why we got in to this situation".

"What has been done is very negative and we agree with the requirements set upon us and we have taken measures...to improve our systems and are capable of complying with sanctions."

US sanctions on Burma have been in place in various forms since 1997,and were extended in August following the guilty verdict handed to opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Despite recently announcing a policy of dialogue with the ruling junta, Washington has said that sanctions will remain in place until tangible signs of progress toward democratic reform are evident.

The US does however maintain a strong, but highly controversial, business presence in Burma through oil company Chevron (formerly Unocal), which operates the Yadana gas field.  

The sanctions that were implemented on Burma in 1997 demanded a halt on new investment in the country, and did not force the withdrawal of companies that had existed there prior to 1997.

Advocacy group EarthRights International estimated in September that  Chevron, along with French oil giant Total, which also operates the Yadana gas field, had contributed around $US5 billion to the Burmese junta, much of which had been siphoned into private Singaporean banks.

 

Related banks

Credit Suisse Switzerland

active
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted