BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Regional judge overturns ban on construction of controversial Belo Monte dam in the Brazilian Amazon

Decision allows for forest clearance and start-up of dam construction to begin, despite violations of human rights and environmental legislation
2011-03-08 | Brazil
By: International Rivers & Amazon Watch
Contact:

Brent Millikan, International Rivers, + 55 61 8153 7009, brent@internationalrivers.org
Leila Salazar-Lopez, Amazon Watch, 415-341-5509, leila@amazonwatch.org
Renata Pinheiro, MXVPS, + 55 93 9172 9776, rspinheiro2@yahoo.ca

2011-03-08 | Brazil
By: International Rivers & Amazon Watch
Contact:

Brent Millikan, International Rivers, + 55 61 8153 7009, brent@internationalrivers.org
Leila Salazar-Lopez, Amazon Watch, 415-341-5509, leila@amazonwatch.org
Renata Pinheiro, MXVPS, + 55 93 9172 9776, rspinheiro2@yahoo.ca

Brasília, Brazil - In yet another turn of events in the increasingly heated legal and political battle over the controversial Belo Monte dam complex, on Thursday the president of a federal regional court in Brasilia, Olindo Menezes, overturned a decision by federal judge Ronaldo Destêrro that prohibited initial construction to commence on the mega-project - slated to be the world's third largest dam - along the Xingu river in the heart of the Brazilian Amazon.

"There is a real danger that bureaucratic delays and procrastination in the Brazilian legal system may contribute to Belo Monte becoming a fait accompli, which would be a death sentence for the Xingu and its people," said Brent Millikan, Amazon Program Director at International Rivers.

The earlier decision by Destêrro, issued on February 25th, was provoked by a civil lawsuit filed by the Federal Public Prosecutor's office. The lawsuit argued that the federal environmental agency, IBAMA had acted illegally in issuing a "partial installation license" -non-existent under Brazilian law- to allow construction to begin on access roads, industrial parks and worker encampments at two sites of the Belo Monte dam complex. The lawsuit noted that the majority of social and environmental pre-requirements for dam construction to begin, such as health, education and sanitation infrastructure in urban areas and demarcation and protection of indigenous lands, had not been complied with by the Norte Energia (NESA) dam-building consortium, headed by parastatal energy company, Eletrobras.

In his decision, regional judge Menezes used a legal artifice ("suspensão de segurança") that dates to the military dictatorship of the 1970s, allowing for previous decisions to be overturned without considering the merits of the case, based on arguments of supposed threats to national security. According to Menezes, there is no need for full compliance with conditionalities of a first phase environmental license for "initial installations" of Belo Monte to begin.

The Public Prosecutor's Office stated that the decision by Menezes was reckless and, if upheld, will lead to irreparable damage to the environment and population of the Xingu region. According to public prosecutor Felicio Pontes, "in all phases of the licensing process, the federal government has disrespected the Brazilian constitution and environmental laws. IBAMA has ceased to be a technical agency and today cedes to political pressures, becoming the main party responsible for deforestation in the Amazon." According to the Public Prosecutor's Office, the beginning of dam construction at Belo Monte may provoke chaos in terms of social infrastructure in the region of Altamira. It is estimated that 8,000 people have already migrated to the city of Altamira in search of employment at the dam site. The federal government estimates that a total of 100,000 people will migrate to the region as a consequence of Belo Monte, and that some 32,000 will remain after construction is completed.

In response to the decision by the regional judge, the Movimento Xingu Vivo para Sempre (MXPVS), a coalition of indigenous people, social movements and other civil society groups opposed to the Belo Monte dam, stated "How can this government call itself democratic and popular while resorting to subterfuges created by the military dictatorship?" According to MXVPS coordinator Antônia Melo, "the decision by the regional court judge is scandalous, but there will be a reaction from social movements and others that defend the rule of law."

The Public Prosecutors Office has already announced that it will appeal the decision by Menezes. Nine other lawsuits regarding the Belo Monte dam complex are also pending.

The risky $17 billion Belo Monte Dam will divert nearly the entire flow of the Xingu River along a 62-mile stretch. Its reservoirs will flood more than 120,000 acres of rainforest and local settlements, displace between 20,000 and 40,000 people and generate vast quantities of methane-a greenhouse gas at least 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide.

 

Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Belo Monte dam

Brazil
Project
On record
Hydroelectric Power Generation

Belo Monte dam

Brazil
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted