BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › BankTrack news ›
BankTrack News

BankTrack and Oxfam Australia call on banks to ensure access to remedy for victims of human rights abuses

New briefing paper explores private sector banks’ responsibilities for effective grievance mechanisms
2018-07-03
By: BankTrack & Oxfam Australia
Contact:

Ryan Brightwell, BankTrack: email ryan@banktrack.org, telephone +31 24 324 9220

Daisy Gardener, Sustainable Food Advocacy Lead, Oxfam Australia: email daisyg@oxfam.org.au, +61 392899240

“Developing Effective Grievance Mechanisms in the Banking Sector”. Photo: Vlad Sohkin/Oxfam AUS
2018-07-03
By: BankTrack & Oxfam Australia
Contact:

Ryan Brightwell, BankTrack: email ryan@banktrack.org, telephone +31 24 324 9220

Daisy Gardener, Sustainable Food Advocacy Lead, Oxfam Australia: email daisyg@oxfam.org.au, +61 392899240

Banks are not doing enough to ensure communities impacted by bank financed activities can get justice – a new paper by BankTrack and Oxfam Australia has found. The briefing paper “Developing Effective Grievance Mechanisms in the Banking Sector” shows that banks have barely begun to implement their responsibilities to develop grievance mechanisms under the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

Meanwhile, there are a growing number of cases globally where banks are considered to have contributed to human rights abuses through their finance. These include projects involving farmers being forced off their land, the destruction of sacred indigenous sites, environmental damage and violence against community members.  

The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, one of the authoritative international standards for responsible business conduct, require that all businesses, including banks, establish or participate in effective operational-level grievance mechanisms for individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by their business.

Discussion papers produced by banks themselves on their human rights responsibilities have avoided addressing their responsibilities under the section of the Guiding Principles dealing with access to remedy .

The briefing paper explores the responsibilities of private sector banks to ensure access to remedy; sets out the benefits of operational-level grievance mechanisms to banks; and describes what such grievance mechanisms in the banking sector would look like in practice.

BankTrack and Oxfam Australia produced the paper following a series of interviews with representatives of large global banks, and extensive consultation with human rights experts and civil society organizations.

The briefing paper recommends that banks:

  1. Acknowledge their responsibilities under the Guiding Principles regarding remedy and grievance mechanisms;
  2. Begin by mapping accountability channels already in place and then building on them;
  3. Ensure that all stakeholder groups, including communities affected by bank-financed projects and activities, have access to bank grievance mechanisms;
  4. Ensure grievance mechanisms are designed with careful attention to the UN Guiding Principles’ effectiveness criteria;
  5. Consider participating in grievance mechanisms in which a number of banks participate — which is open to communities affected by the finance of any bank participating — alongside single-bank mechanisms;
  6. Ensure the Equator Principles Association develops an effective grievance mechanism that can assess claims that the Equator Principles standards are not being properly applied by banks and project sponsors,
  7. Write consent into agreements with clients to publish corporate loan and project finance information related to businesses engaged in high risk areas, so that affected people know which banks are financing the activities affecting them.
  8. Design mechanisms that are empowered and equipped to deliver remedy,
  9. Engage with clients to ensure their own operational-level grievance mechanisms are effective,
  10. Seek guidance, including from the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights, where responsibilities are unclear.

Download the briefing paper here.

Notes

The UN Guiding Principles can be found here. For an assessment of banks' human rights policy and practice, see BankTrack, “Banking with Principles?”, 2016

BankTrack, How Banks Contribute to Human Rights Violations, December 2017

The Thun Group of banks has published two discussion papers, the first “on Implications of Principles 16–21” in 2013 and the second “on the implications of Principles 13b & 17” in 2017.  (These are available on the website of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre). The UN Guiding Principles which set out business responsibilities regarding remediation and access to remedy, Principles 22 and 29 - 31, were not discussed in these papers.

Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted