BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
International Bank Campaigners Gathering
Donate
2023-05-25 00:00:00
Philippines communities are fighting back against gas & LNG build-out in the Verde Island Passage
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
Connect
2023-06-01 00:00:00
BankTrack's submission to the public consultation on TNFD V0.4
2023-05-03 00:00:00
A Rotten Business: How Barclays became the go-to bank for JBS, one of the world's most destructive meat corporations
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
End Coal Finance
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › BankTrack news ›
BankTrack News

Judge dismisses DAPL case against BankTrack in full: our reaction

2018-07-25
By: BankTrack
Contact:

Johan Frijns, Director, BankTrack: +31 24 324 9220

Legal counsel, Robin Martinez: +1.816.694.6304, martinezlaw.net

For all additional media enquiries please contact Ryan Brightwell, BankTrack: ryan@banktrack.org

Photo: BankTrack
2018-07-25
By: BankTrack
Contact:

Johan Frijns, Director, BankTrack: +31 24 324 9220

Legal counsel, Robin Martinez: +1.816.694.6304, martinezlaw.net

For all additional media enquiries please contact Ryan Brightwell, BankTrack: ryan@banktrack.org

The lawsuit filed against BankTrack by Energy Transfer Partners (ETP), the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, has been dismissed by a North Dakota District Court. The judge ruled that Energy Transfer had failed to state a plausible Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act (RICO) claim against BankTrack, and that without that, the court has no jurisdiction over BankTrack for the additional non-federal claims. 

The judge’s dismissal can be downloaded here.

The judgement reaches far beyond a narrow focus on BankTrack's advocacy, making clear that ETP's arguments represent a "dangerously broad" application of RICO that would allow governments and corporations "to curtail almost any disagreeable, arguably protected speech". While the judgment focuses on BankTrack's advocacy activity, including writing to banks and publishing commentary on their activities, ETP's complaint is packed full of attempts to characterise the everyday advocacy of all the defendants, including Greenpeace and others, as being somehow criminal in nature.

BankTrack director Johan Frijns said: “We’re very pleased to learn that the frivolous claims against BankTrack have been dismissed. Everything we have been saying has been vindicated. Energy Transfer’s allegations about our supposed involvement in directing acts of “radical ecoterrorism” were hard to take seriously from the outset, and we are pleased that the judge has confirmed that these were sweeping statements without any basis in fact.

“BankTrack raised legitimate human rights concerns arising from the Dakota Access Pipeline with the banks financing the project. The judge’s decision confirms that this type of advocacy work is legitimate and is not “reasonably or plausibly related” to any acts of criminal conduct, as was alleged by Energy Transfer. 

“We hope the judge will now similarly dismiss the case against the other defendants, and that the ringing rejection of this case will discourage other corporations from launching these kinds of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation. BankTrack is grateful to our lawyer, Robin Martinez, and to EarthRights International, for their exceptional and tireless work in helping us resist this case.”

Marco Simons, General Counsel of EarthRights International, which serves as consulting counsel for BankTrack in the lawsuit, commented: "Corporations attempting to silence criticism of their conduct have started turning to the RICO statute, and Judge Wilson's decision is a strong rebuke to this tactic. The opinion makes clear that however much a company like Energy Transfer Partners dislikes public criticism of its projects, it cannot use RICO to argue that its critics are involved in organized crime. This is the right interpretation of the law, and it should shut down similar efforts against other advocates and nonprofits."

BankTrack, Earth First! and Greenpeace were named as defendants in the lawsuit by Energy Transfer Equity and Energy Transfer Partners, the companies behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, in September 2017. The lawsuit alleged that BankTrack, along with other environmental advocacy groups "manufactured and disseminated materially false and misleading information about Energy Transfer and the Dakota Access Pipeline" and "incited, funded, and facilitated crimes and acts of terrorism to further these objectives." BankTrack’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit was filed in November 2017. ETP has a right to appeal the judge's decision.

The judge’s dismissal can be downloaded here.
Other key documents concerning the case are collected on the BankTrack website here.
Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Dakota Access Pipeline

United States
Project
On record
Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil

Dakota Access Pipeline

United States
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel End Coal Finance Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted