Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2022-06-02 00:00:00
GFANZ must tighten the screw on fossil fuel expansion
2022-05-19 00:00:00
BNP Paribas and Société Générale: stop financing climate destruction and human rights abuses
2022-05-04 00:00:00
Barclays is big on beef and burning
2022-05-04 00:00:00
Standard Chartered’s 2022 AGM dominated by shareholder alarm over fossil financing
2022-05-20 15:14:47
Seven financiers abandon TotalEnergies' EACOP pipeline in a week
2021-12-16 13:33:02
Cambo oil field "paused" following pressure on Shell & banks
2021-12-16 13:04:42
Equator Principles improve transparency after BankTrack shows the way
2021-11-02 11:03:26
ANZ launches human rights grievance mechanism in a first for the global banking sector
Connect
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
2022-03-08 00:00:00
BankTrack Annual Report 2021
2022-03-03 00:00:00
Locked out of a Just Transition: fossil fuel financing in Africa
2021-12-14 00:00:00
Actions speak louder: Assessing bank responses to human rights violations
2021-10-26 00:00:00
Equator Compliant Climate Destruction: How banks finance fossil fuels under the Equator Principles
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › Projects
Jaitapur nuclear power plant India
About
Financiers
Companies
Impacts
Documents
News
Media
Links
Updates
About
Financiers
Companies
Impacts
Documents
News
Media
Links
Updates

On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date

Send feedback on this profile
Download as PDF
By: BankTrack
Created before Nov 2016
Last update: 2016-10-07 00:16:39

Contact:

Jan Haverkamp, Greenpeace International, Belgium

Jan Beranek, Greenpeace International, Netherland


Share this page:

Sector Nuclear Electric Power Generation
Location

About Jaitapur nuclear power plant

The Jaitapur project plans to host two European Pressurised Reactors (EPRs) of 1,650 MWe each, with possible extension by four additional units. The Generation III+ class EPR has been designed and developed by the French company AREVA.

A coalition of environmental and citizen groups is calling on European banks and decision-makers not to provide their support and participation in this and similar projects. Facts about nuclear safety, local oppression, approval procedures, institutional frameworks and project economics strongly indicate the application of double standards when compared to what is common and required in European countries.

Latest developments

2011-06-08 00:00:00

What must happen

Any of the banks approached should not finance the Jaitapur nuclear power plant project directly or indirectly through general funding to NPCIL.

Impacts

Social and human rights impacts

Destruction of local farming and fishing
The official report by NPCIL says that the plant's heating water outlet could increase sea temperature in the area by 5 degree C. However, environmental consultant P R Arun claims that released water would affect the entire food chain and decimate the fish catch and obviously impact seriously the livelihoods of people associated. Even small quantities of hot water can destroy marine life, as was observed near the Tarapur (Mumbai) atomic power station.

In fact, half a degree increase in the temperature will be detrimental for the sensitive species. One example is the prawn, which is an highly economically important fishery resource. Nearly 6,000 people depend on fishing in the area and more than 10,000 benefit indirectly. Twelve villages in the vicinity have an annual income of 150 million INR (€ 2.5 million) from fishing.

The district is also a recognised horticulture zone, with many farms growing mango (the internationally famous Ratnagiri Alphonso variety), cashew and jackfruit for export. As a direct result of the project, 770 families would lose their land entirely and another 150 families would lose part of their farming land.

Human rights violation
Since a nuclear power plant at Jaitapur was proposed in February 2009, there have been protests against the plants by the local population, farmers and fishermen. Between December 2009 and January 2010, officials of NPCIL acquired 938 hectares of locally-owned lands for setting up what is proposed as the world's biggest nuclear power plant. The compensation offered was as low as 3 INR (5 eurocents) per square metre. It was rejected by local people, who argued that they did not want to give away their land. Their protest was suppressed by police who beat and arrested hundreds of villagers.

Environmental and climate impacts

Valuable ecosystem
A comprehensive carrying capacity analysis, which should assess the ability of the ecosystems in the region to carry the burden, has not yet been carried out, despite a request by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. The area is part of an important and intact mangrove ecosystem, with dozens of species living in the district concerned. Field studies have revealed that the mangroves of this region are significantly threatened, with several species recorded as endangered and/or critically endangered. The narrow strip of land between the coastline and the Western Ghats mountains is recognised as being environmentally sensitive. Its grasslands play an important role for maintaining freshwater reservoirs and preventing sea water ingress. The area provides a suitable habitat for wild animals such as leopards, white-bellied sea eagles, wild cats, hares and jungle fowl, and gaurs and elephants have also been observed.

Other impacts

Earthquake zone
India is divided into four types of seismic risk zones by the Indian standard code, IS 1893 (‘Criteria for earthquake-resistant design of structures’). Jaitapur is located in one of the ‘high-risk zones’, classified as Zone IV, meaning that it is prone to strong earthquakes.
The Jaitapur area is transversed by three tectonic faults. A number of earthquakes have been recorded here in the last 20 years alone, with the strongest - in 1993 - having a 6.3 magnitude on the Richter scale, and with three others exceeding magnitudes of 5.

Nuclear Safety
During recent construction projects in Olkiluoto in Finland and Flamanville in France, a number of technical and safety problems have been identified with the EPRs, such as heavy interconnection between safety and instrumentation digital systems that may lead to their failure, or questionable ability to withstand impact by an airliner. Serious defects in the quality of components, as well as welding and construction work, have also occurred at both sites.

The Finnish safety agency STUK recorded over 3,000 safety and quality problems with EPR construction. It has been recognised that these problems occurred because attempts to reduce costs led the company to select cheap, incompetent subcontractors and overlook safety-related problems. In addition, nuclear safety training was not provided to workers. In France, inspections repeatedly mentioned that the problems arose from “haste without any quality assurance process”.

The pressure to keep the EPR cost very low in India could cause even larger problems with cutting safety corners and poor quality of construction than we have seen in France and Finland. The cost of the two Jaitapur EPR units is officially estimated at 32,000 crore (€ 5.4 billion). This is less than half of the cost estimates of building the reactors in Europe or Canada. The argument about cheap labour in India cannot explain such a massive price discrepancy, as most of the price comes from engineering equipment and heavy components.

In addition, EPR reactors are inherently harder to build and control because of their larger size and the fact that they are designed to use high fuel burn-up, which places higher requirements and stricter standards on the quality of their construction. In contrast most Indian reactors built to date have been units up to eight times smaller (220 MWe), with just two coming close to even one-third (540 MWe) of the size of an EPR (1,650 MWe).

Last but not least, the lack of independence of the Indian nuclear safety authorities can result in many possible problems not being detected or with their corrections not being sufficiently enforced.

India’s weak regulatory environment
a) Not a member of Non-Proliferation Treaty. India is a country that has never joined the Non-Proliferation Treaty. It is known to use many of its nuclear facilities for dual purposes, i.e. for both energy production and the fabrication of fissile materials for military use.

b) No independent regulator authority for nuclear safety. The 1962 Atomic Energy Act established the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) as the body responsible for nuclear energy. This department directly operates a number of nuclear facilities in India. In 1983, the DEA established the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) as the entity in charge of nuclear regulation. It reports to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). This arrangement means that the AERB lacks any independency, because members of the AEC include three institutions actively involved in nuclear business: the Secretary of the DAE, the Director of the Baba Atomic Research Center, and the Managing Director of NPCIL, which will be the future operator of Jaitapur’s reactors. In contrast, current EU legislation requires that “Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is functionally separate from any other body or organisation concerned with the promotion, or utilisation of nuclear energy, including electricity production, in order to ensure effective independence from undue influence in its regulatory decision making“ (EU Directive 2009/71).

c) Unresolved responsibility for damage caused by a nuclear accident. Another issue of relevance to the Jaitapur project is the non-existence of any legislation that would deal with liability of nuclear power plants in case of accidents and damage to the public and third parties. The Indian Prime Minister was forced to withdraw a draft liability bill, tabled in Congress in March 2010, due to political outcry. Some of its prominent critics, for example former prosecutor Soli Sorabjee, concluded that the bill was non-constitutional.

Lack of transparency
The 1962 Atomic Energy Act is an outdated piece of legislation, which does not guarantee access to any information. There is no possibility to file a request under the Right to Information Act (adopted in 2005) in order to make information public.
There has also been lack of transparency in public hearings for the project. The first public hearing was organised in August 2006. It was conducted in English despite villagers requesting it in the Marathi language that they speak. “The company did not even provide the EIA report before the hearing,” says Vivek Y Bhide, a practicing doctor and one of local opposition leaders.

Governance

Updates

2011-06-08 00:00:00

Due to the Fukushima controversy, the project is currently in standby mode. At the moment banks still need to analyse the project, the visits that were supposed to take place in India have been postponed, and no due diligence has been done yet on the project.

Protests are continuing against the proposed power plant and recently one turned violent. On April 18 in the coastal Ratnagiri district one protestor was killed and seven others injured doing a demonstration against the nuclear plant. Around 600-700 locals were involved in the protest.

France and India signed on December 6th, 2010 a General Framework Agreement between French nuclear major Areva and Nuclear Power Cooperation of India Ltd (NPCIL) for building two European pressurised reactors (EPR) in Jaitapur. But some issues, including the price of these reactors and differences over India’s civil nuclear liability law, will have to be sorted out before the commercial contract is executed.

Financiers

Related companies

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) India

Orano France show profile

Mining | Nuclear Electric Power Generation

News

| |
Type:
Year:
blog
external news
our news

Anti-Areva Protest: Letter to French and European Bankers from Fishermen and Farmers of Jaitapur

2013-06-04 | DiaNuke.org
blog
external news
our news

First phase of Jaitapur nuclear project may be delayed by 1 year

2011-08-15 | India | Business Standard
blog
external news
our news

France ready to finance the next Fukushima

Paris, July 12th, 2011 – Today, in a letter sent to President Sarkozy (1), more than one hundred organisations around the world officially asked France not to finance the nuclear power plant project in Jaitapur, India. This future atomic complex presents major risks for India and the world.
2011-07-12 | Paris | Les Amis de la Terre, Greenpeace
blog
external news
our news

No safety study undertaken on Jaitapur project: Justice Shah

2011-05-23 | India | The Hindu
blog
external news
our news

Protest mounts against earthquake prone nuke plant

2011-05-20 | India | Karuna Raina, Greenpeace
blog
external news
our news

Banking on the next Fukushima

2011-05-11 | India | Greenpeace International
blog
external news
our news

PM, Maha CM to get 21000 faxes opposing Jaitapur plant

2011-05-05 | India | Sifynews
blog
external news
our news

India’s Jaitapur Gearing Up for Another Chernobyl?

2011-05-03 | India | Greenpacks
blog
external news
our news

Areva hopeful of sealing Jaitapur deal by mid-2011

2011-04-20 | India | Hindustan Times
blog
external news
our news

NPCIL tests confidence in world’s biggest nuclear plant

2011-04-19 | India | livemint.com
blog
external news
our news

At least 20 injured in protests over Jaitapur nuclear plant

2011-04-19 | Reuters
blog
external news
our news

One dead in Jaitapur N-plant protests

2011-04-18 | India | Zeenews
blog
external news
our news

Mango Farmers, Fisherman Fight India Nuclear Plant

2011-04-06 | Bloomberg
blog
external news
our news

International banks keen to fund Jaitapur project: NPCIL

2011-03-24 | Mumbai | The Hindu Business Line
blog
external news
our news

French firm to review Jaitapur eco report

2011-03-23 | Mumbai | Hindustan Times Mumbai
blog
external news
our news

Reconsider Jaitapur N-Project: Greenpeace

2011-03-22 | Mumbai | Outlook India
blog
external news
our news

Deutsche Bank cancels interest in Jaitapur nuclear project India

2011-03-22 | New Delhi, Berlin | urgewald, Greenpeace
blog
external news
our news

20 years, 92 quakes: Ground trembles beneath Jaitapur's feet

2011-03-16 | India | The Times of India
blog
external news
our news

BNP Paribas releases new policy on nuclear financing

Financing of Angra III and -possibly- Jaitapur plants shows hypocricy of effort
2011-02-15 | Paris | Les Amis de la Terre
blog
external news
our news

French Government to take final decision on Jaitapur Nuclear project

2010-12-23 | French Tribune
blog
external news
our news

France signs pact on Jaitapur N-plant

2010-12-07 | Hindustan times
blog
external news
our news

India to build nuclear reactors in earthquake zone with help from BNP Paribas

2010-12-06 | Paris | Greenpeace International
blog
external news
our news

Thousands protest against French-backed Indian nuclear plant

2010-12-04 | The Times of India
blog
external news
our news

BankTrack calls on banks to stop funding nuclear power

New website exposes nuclear secrets of commercial banks
2010-05-26 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack

Documents

Type:
Year:
ngo documents
2010-12-07 00:00:00

Greenpeace briefing on Jaitapur

2010-12-07 00:00:00 | Greenpeace

Media

Demonstration against Jaitapur NPP




Video links

http://www.bloomberg.com/video/68371126/

Links

Voyage de Nicolas Sarkozy en Inde : la population dit non à l’EPR !

http://energie-climat.greenpeace.fr/voyage-de-nicolas-sarkozy-en-inde-la-population-dit-non-a-lepr
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted