Banks| Dodgy Deals| Map| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2020-12-22 00:00:00
Blog: In 2020, the Equator Principles struggle to remain relevant
2020-12-14 00:00:00
The battle to stop Line 3 is heating up on the ground and across the US
2020-12-14 00:00:00
Corporate accountability and the just transition: Frameworks for holding corporations accountable for climate change
2020-12-12 00:00:00
Five years since the Paris Agreement, are banks' 2050 pledges enough to reign in fossil fuel finance?
2020-09-24 12:53:20
Oscislowo open-pit coal mine cancelled
2020-09-08 13:07:41
Strengthened OECD guidance on responsible banking
2020-02-25 10:35:27
JPMorgan Chase Coal and Arctic Policy a step forward but fails to match its climate responsibility as the world’s #1 Fossil Bank
2020-02-18 17:27:23
Civil society groups welcome Royal Bank of Scotland preparing to exit fossil fuels
Connect
2020-11-30 00:00:00
Soft Commitments, Hard Lessons: an analysis of the Soft Commodities Compact
2020-11-24 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II
2020-11-18 00:00:00
Crude Risk: Risks to banks and investors from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline
2020-09-16 00:00:00
Principles for Paris-Aligned Financial Institutions: Climate Impact, Fossil Fuels and Deforestation
2020-08-17 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part I
2020-03-18 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Change - Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2020
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Home › News
Official Review of the Xayaburi Dam Reveals Project Flaws
Start
Dodgy Deals

By: Ame Trandem, International Rivers
2011-03-31
United States

Share this page:

A long-brewing regional debate over whether or not to build the proposed Xayaburi Dam on the Mekong River has hit boiling point.  

If there were any delusional fantasies remaining that mainstream dam building could be sustainable, the Mekong River Commission's new independent technical review of the proposed Xayaburi Dam has surely dissolved them.  

The MRC Secretariat's expert review of the Xayaburi Dam's key project documents - released a few days ago - highlights the grave environmental and social harms associated with the project, while also identifying considerable knowledge gaps that remain and require comprehensive study over the short to long-term.  

The harm caused to the Mekong River's fisheries alone will be devastating.

As the Mekong River hosts the world's largest freshwater fishery and ranks as the second most biodiverse river in the world, the dam will block an important fish migration route and forever alter the river's habitat. The review warns that as many as 23 to 100 fish species would be threatened, including the Mekong Giant Catfish and four others found in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Based on the review's study of the cascade of six dams, including the Xayaburi Dam, proposed in this stretch of the river, fishery losses are estimated at around 66,000 tons per year, which is nearly half of the entire estimated yield for the country of Laos. While the exact loss associated with the Xayaburi Dam is not known, the review states that "Experience from other areas suggests that most of the loss would be associated with construction of the first dam in the cascade."  With the majority of the basin's population dependent on the river's resources, the loss would place the livelihoods of more than 450,000 people at risk. 

While the project developer's Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) made false claims that fishery losses could be mitigated, the MRC's review on the other hand minces no words. Its experts state that transboundary impacts to fisheries will remain even if international best practice is applied to dam design and operation, as "there is no definitive solution to mitigate the lost fish production in the Xayaburi Dam area." The review also dispels the myth that reservoir fisheries may be an effective mitigation measure, by stating that there is a "misunderstanding that damming the river to create a series of run-of-the river reservoirs could increase the fishery yields."  

While this project should clearly be canceled, numerous questions remain. Will the future decision over Xayaburi reflect science and reason, or will it be based solely on politics? Will public accountability be at stake given the expressed opposition to the project during the public consultation process? How can the continuation of the decision-making process be justified given the fact that the project has failed to meet the minimal requirements set out by the MRC's Project Design Guidelines, let alone international best practice?

With so much at stake, one hopes that facts will be central to the final regional decision-making meeting scheduled for April 21st.

More information: 

  • Read the MRC's Prior Consultation Project Review Report
  • Read the MRC's reports on the National Consultation Meetings held on the Xayaburi Dam in Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam.

Related Dodgy Deals

Projects

There are no projects active for this item now.
on record

Xayaburi dam Laos

Hydroelectric Power Generation
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted