BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Russia
Banks and Steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications Events calendar
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Get in touch
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin Login
Home › Partner blog ›
Partner News

Oil and gas financiers are staring down the barrel at $1 trillion in losses: time to rein in support for new pipelines

2021-02-16
By: Greig Aitken - Global Energy Monitor
A warning sign for a high-pressure natural gas pipeline buried underground near Parshall, Colorado, from Xcel Energy. Photo: Tony Webster via Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
2021-02-16
By: Greig Aitken - Global Energy Monitor

A blog by Greig Aitken, Finance researcher, Global Energy Monitor

After four years of climate change denialism at the White House, US President Joe Biden has quickly moved to reinstall reality, and then some. If day one of the new administration duly delivered the widely trailed re-entry of America into the Paris Climate Agreement and the cancellation of the permit for the $9 billion Keystone XL oil pipeline, a week later on January 27 Biden’s 7,500+ word executive order on climate policy landed – with a notable emphasis on ending US support and financing for fossil fuels overseas.  

That same day the US’s new climate envoy, former Secretary of State John Kerry, wasted no time in singling out gas as a top priority for global action, telling a virtual meeting of the World Economic Forum: “If we build out huge infrastructure for gas now and continue to use it as the bridge fuel … we’re gonna be stuck with stranded assets in 10 or 20 or 30 years.”

Kerry’s flagging of the ‘bridge fuel’ myth to political and business leaders is telling. It’s the gas industry’s big climate lie that methane, more than 25 times as potent as carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere, has a role to play in the clean energy transition. And it’s the dangerous myth, according to research published this month, behind why over 82% of all pipelines currently in development the world over are designed to carry gas.

Global Energy Monitor (GEM) has identified a planned 212,000-kilometre expansion of oil and gas pipelines which, if realised, would support a lifetime increase in oil and gas CO2 emissions of 170 gigatonnes, only 15% less than the projected lifetime CO2 emissions of the currently operating global coal plant fleet. It’s a recipe for climate disaster and also financial disaster, given the commitments to transition to carbon neutrality by mid-century which have now been made by most of the world’s large economies.

GEM has put a price tag on John Kerry’s pipeline stranded assets rallying cry, estimating the capital costs for this potential fossil fuel blow out at US$1 trillion. These are projects already under construction or in pre-construction development, so the money involved could be mobilised in the short- to medium-term, despite growing public resistance to pipelines.

Something is going to have to give, and it’s clear from the US oil and gas industry’s reaction to the Biden executive order that if it’s shocked and beginning to see the writing on the wall, it’s far from awed and won’t be cowed easily.

Finance has to step up

The finance industry’s reaction – action not rhetoric – to the Biden ‘climate effect’ will be crucial here and one of the UK’s largest asset managers has already read the newly configured room. Aviva Investors two weeks ago let the financial world know that it has written to 30 of the largest oil, gas and coal companies and effectively threatened to divest from them if they don’t start to set out credible net zero transition plans. Significantly, Aviva is also telling these major polluters that it’s prepared not just to dump their stock, but it could also become allergic pretty quickly to their sale of bonds, which corporates have increasingly turned to in recent years to raise capital.

Other key debt financiers – Wall Street and other international commercial banks – must surely now be emboldened by the fresh political mood music on climate, not to mention the rapidly converging financial and social license risks attached to oil and gas.

They need to deal with oil and gas pipelines (and LNG terminals too) as most of them have done with toxic coal plants, Canadian tar sands projects and Arctic oil exploration over the last five years. And this requires the introduction of formal finance policies which starve pipeline expansion companies of new loans and access to bonds.

GEM also zoomed into the financing of the midstream infrastructure connected with the Permian Basin in the United States, which has surpassed Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar Field to become the biggest-producing oil field in the world. Over US$100 billion in bank loans and bond issues from more than 100 institutions was identified since 2014, with Japanese banks leading the way. Linking all of these institutions? An almost total unwillingness to formally rein in funding support for the main arteries of the fossil fuel sector.

The top 20 identified funders of Permian oil and gas pipelines and Gulf Coast export terminals, 2014 to November 2020

Financier

Country

Pipelines (US$)

Terminals (US$)

Total (US$)

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation

Japan

1,081,270,000

6,345,250,000

7,426,520,000

MUFG

Japan

1,340,110,000

5,710,060,000

7,050,170,000

Mizuho

Japan

878,540,000

5,320,320,000

6,198,860,000

Japan Bank for International Corporation

Japan

0

5,195,000,000

5,195,000,000

Société Générale

France

152,500,000

4,676,795,000

4,829,295,000

ING

Netherlands

227,530,000

4,423,350,000

4,650,880,000

Royal Bank of Canada

Canada

323,800,000

3,568,060,000

3,891,860,000

HSBC

United Kingdom

70,000,000

3,162,120,000

3,232,120,000

Scotiabank

Canada

373,800,000

3,212,980,000

3,586,780,000

Goldman Sachs

United States

175,000,000

2,883,620,000

3,058,620,000

JPMorgan Chase

United States

70,000,000

2,892,480,000

2,962,480,000

Morgan Stanley

United States

0

2,817,540,000

2,817,540,000

Crédit Agricole

France

52,500,000

2,678,920,000

2,731,420,000

Credit Suisse

Switzerland

0

2,358,980,000

2,358,980,000

Bank of America

United States

323,800,000

2,249,907,000

2,573,707,000

IFM Investors

Australia

0

2,243,000,000

2,243,000,000

Santander

Spain

117,740,000

2,078,810,000

2,196,550,000

Natixis

France

114,030,000

2,033,900,000

2,147,930,000

Intesa Sanpaolo

Italy

257,070,000

2,124,900,000

2,381,970,000

BBVA

Spain

150,000,000

1,876,440,000

2,026,440,000

 

Just two years ago, the previously highly conservative European Investment Bank, the EU’s bank, was a convinced supporter of fossil fuel projects around the world. Last month, and with a policy now in place which stamps out multi-billion dollar funding support for fossil fuels, the bank’s president told reporters, “To put it mildly, gas is over.”

The finance sector can move quickly on oil and gas pipelines – and, to put it mildly, most of it still needs to. If a February 5 tweet from John Kerry is anything to go by, he and the new US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen appear to be ready to give at least Wall Street the necessary push.

9675
picture1_tweet.png
center
.
Photo: John Kerry / Twitter

 

Global Energy Monitor is a network of researchers developing information on fossil projects and energy alternatives. GEM’s databases are used by Bloomberg Terminals, the World Bank, the United Nations Environment Programme, International Energy Agency and many other organisations. Current projects include the Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker and the Global Coal Plant Tracker.

Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Russia Banks and Steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications Events calendar
Raiffeisen Out! Bank.Green End Coal Finance Plastic Banks Tracker Defund TotalEnergies Financial Exclusions Tracker Equator-Complaints.Org Don't Buy into Occupation Banks & Biodiversity Forests & Finance Drop JBS StopEACOP Fossil-Free Finance
BankTrack
About BankTrack Organisation Our team Our board Our annual reports Funding and finances Guiding principles Our history BankTrack in the media Team up with us Our privacy policy Donate Get in touch
Successes Contact BankTrack
Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact us
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Linkedin
© BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted