BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Tribes Dispute Greenwashing by Dam Builders

Conflict of Interest at Heart of Sustainability Guidelines, Says Environmental Group
2011-06-16 | Foz do Iguaçú, Brazil
By: International Rivers
Contact:

Zachary Hurwitz
zachary@internationalrivers.org
+1 510-848-1155

2011-06-16 | Foz do Iguaçú, Brazil
By: International Rivers
Contact:

Zachary Hurwitz
zachary@internationalrivers.org
+1 510-848-1155

Indigenous people from Brazil's vast but shrinking Amazon region yesterday interrupted the Congress of the International Hydropower Association, claiming that the Belo Monte Dam was approved illegally by the Brazilian government, vowing to fight as long as it takes to stop the dam.  At the same event, environmental activists dismissed a new voluntary environmental tool as an effort by the dam industry to greenwash its practices.

Sheyla Juruna of the Juruna tribe, which would be directly impacted by the Belo Monte Dam as it reduces access to water on the Xingu River, surprised the director of Brazil's Eletrobras while he was giving a presentation in which he claimed that the Brazilian government received consent to build the dam from the region's most important indigenous leaders.  Ms. Juruna, who was joined by Mr. Patxon Metuktire, grandson of legendary chief Raoni of the Kayapó tribe, gave detailed accounts of the  reunions with indigenous leaders, in which government representatives set up photo opportunities and expressed the monetary compensation that the tribes would receive, while never receiving their final consent.  

The two indigenous representatives also described to an audience of concerned industry figures and politicians from across the world how the Brazilian government recently approved a construction license for the dam, despite the Norte Energia consortium never having fulfilled the 40 social and environmental prerequisites mandated by Brazilian legislation to prepare the region to face Belo Monte's impacts.

Ms. Juruna, whose tribe would suffer directly from reduced access to water as 80% of the Xingu river is diverted into two reservoirs, stated that "Norte Energia's avoidance of its requisite social and environmental duties are representative of a larger problem in the hydropower industry.  Dam builders don't comply with their legal responsibilities, in order to avoid paying higher costs.  It's a shame that the industry pretends it has obtained consent from affected indigenous people, when there is glaring evidence that it has not."  The statement echoed recent opinions by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and by Brazilian academic associations, which have requested a moratorium on the dam until the matter of indigenous consent is resolved.  The Brazilian government reacted harshly against the decision of the IACHR, threatening to remove its representative from the multi-lateral body.

This week's protests coincided with the dam industry's official launch of the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol, a voluntary score card for the dam industry to measure how well it complies with social and environmental sustainability guidelines.  However, environmental organization International Rivers claimed that the new guidelines are weak, in that they do not require developers to comply with national legislation nor with international policy standards.  The new score card promotes indigenous peoples' right to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, but does not require hydropower developers to obtain it before beginning construction.

Zachary Hurwitz, International Rivers' Policy Coordinator, stated that "there is a conflict of interest at the heart of the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol.  While it's necessary for industry to learn how to do sustainability in the right way, the Protocol substantially increases the risk that hydropower companies will be allowed to greenwash a project while they continue to cut corners behind closed doors.  The new guidelines essentially put the fox in charge of the hen house."  

The fracas at the conference also reopened older wounds felt by people who were displaced by the Itaipú Dam, currently Brazil's largest, during the 1980s.  Representatives of the Guaraní tribe, who were displaced by the dam and currently live in run-down encampments on the shores of its reservoir, joined a group of Brazil's Movement of Dam-Affected People outside the Congress, in protest of what they claimed were structural human rights violations and a lack of transparency in the Brazilian dam industry. 


According to Patxon Metuktire, "Dam-affected people and civil society expect the dam industry to follow national law and international standards in each case, so that projects like Belo Monte and Itaipú, which have great social impacts, don't go forward.  We won't accept the dam industry's greenwashing."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For more information about the IHA's Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol: http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/6563

For more information about the Belo Monte Dam:
http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/5236

For more information about the Movimento Xingu Vivo Para Sempre:
http://www.xinguvivo.org.br (Portuguese)

International Rivers is an environmental and human rights organization with staff in four continents. For over two decades, International Rivers has been at the heart of the global struggle to protect rivers and the rights of communities that depend on them.

 

Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Belo Monte dam

Brazil
Project
On record
Hydroelectric Power Generation

Belo Monte dam

Brazil
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted