BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Profits through destruction - The other annual balance of Andritz

80.-100.000 people and hundreds of species pay the price for the company's gains
2011-03-07 | Vienna, Austria
By: ECA watch Austria
Contact:

Ulrich Eichelmann ECA Watch +43 676 83488279

2011-03-07 | Vienna, Austria
By: ECA watch Austria
Contact:

Ulrich Eichelmann ECA Watch +43 676 83488279

„We at ANDRITZ are committed to sustainable development. For ANDRITZ, sustainable development encompasses a full set of environmental measures but at the same time goes beyond them."

„The ANDRITZ GROUP is committed to promoting environmental protection and conservation of natural resources." 

On March 8th the Austrian company Andritz will present its financial balance for 2010. The company's CEOs will talk a lot about gains in business and record profits. What will not be presented is the price that had to be and will have to be paid by the ecosystems and affected people in the project regions.

ECA Watch Austria took a look at Andritz' socio-ecological balance of 2010. „Andritz' balance in terms of numbers and money may be good for the company, but the real balance for people and nature is disastrous. Andritz has become one of the most ruthless companies in its area of business. They participate even in projects  that are abandoned by competitors," said Ulrich Eichelmann from ECA Watch Austria.

Andritz' socio-ecological balance based only on the company's three biggest projects Ilisu dam (Turkey), Belo Monte and dams along the Rio Madeira (both Brazil):

-         Displacement of 85.000 to 100.000 people1

-         Elimination of 100 to 150 species2

-         Destruction of 210.000 hectares of unique landscape3

-         Destruction of the antique city of Hasankeyf and other areas of significant cultural heritage along the Tigris river

These numbers represent low estimates, a) because of the overall limited knowledge about species populations in affected areas, b) because they only include the directly affected people, not those who are effected downstream of the dam by the reduced water flow, the deterioration of water quality etc. and c) because not all of Andritz' projects could be included in this evaluation due to lack of project information.

In terms of the most disastrous projects one would have to add the "Bell Bay pulp mill" project in Tasmania/Australia, which is is on halt at the moment due to ongoing protest by environmental groups in the region. According to project plans, the installation and operation of this pulp mill would swallow 200.000 hectares of native forest and would produce 64.000 cubic meters of wastewater per day which would be led into the ocean, endangering nearby marine species.

For the company's reputation 2010 was a special year. The list of opponents has significantly grown: human rights, environmental and church organizations protested against Andritz. Demonstrations took place in Austria, France, Turkey, Tasmania and Brazil. The NGOs BankTrack and Les Amis de la Terre (Friends of the Earth France) put Andritz on a black list of companies which should be excluded from ethical funds.

Andritz more ruthless than other companies

Andritz even participates in projects when other companies pull out on ethical grounds. In the case of the Ilisu project in Turkey for example, where European governments and banks withdrew from the projects and even Andritz' partners in the building consortium pulled out, Andritz remained in the project. After a two year examination the governments of Germany, Austria and Switzerland had suggested the halt of the project. The European banks and construction companies followed the instruction, except Andritz.  Instead, they proudly announced in mid-2010 their "biggest contract in history." (Andritz Hydro News No 18).

In September 2010 Andritz received bad news. The Bell Bay pulp mill project in Tasmania was stopped and a several-hundred-million-Euro deal for the Austrian firm was put on halt.

At the beginning of 2011 Andritz signed the contracts for the Belo Monte project in Brazil. Their shares increased in value, but this was no good news for the people and the nature in Amazonia. "Andritz' statements on the company's website concerning its sustainability policies appear quite cynical facing the reality on the ground. Andritz should create and follow social and ecological standards for their work in order to limit their negative impact on people and environment and to stay reliable," concluded Ulrich Eichelmann.


1  Displacement and loss of livelihood: Ilisu: 65.000-78.000 people, Belo Monte: 20.000 people, Rio Madeira:?

2  Extinction of species from the planet: Belo Monte: 100 fish species + unknown number of other species groupes, Ilisu: > 2 species, Rio Madeira: ?

3  Directly affected space through construction and opperation: Ilisu: 31.300 hectares, 400km of rivers, Belo Monte: 150.000 hectares (51.600 ha reservoir + dryed out stretches), Rio Madeira: 50.000 hectares. 

 

Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Belo Monte dam

Brazil
Project
On record
Hydroelectric Power Generation

Belo Monte dam

Brazil

Ilisu dam

Turkey
Project
On record
Hydroelectric Power Generation

Ilisu dam

Turkey

Tamar Valley Pulp Mill Tasmania (formerly Gunns Pulp Mill)

Australia
Project
On record
Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Mills

Tamar Valley Pulp Mill Tasmania (formerly Gunns Pulp Mill)

Australia
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted