Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Right-wing attack on sustainable finance is the latest form of climate denial
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
OECD releases letters clarifying banks’ human rights responsibilities
Start

By: BankTrack
2014-07-22
Nijmegen

Contact:

ryan@banktrack.org


Share this page:

OECD Guidelines. Photo: OECD
Go to:
Start

At the OECD's Global Forum on Responsible Business Conduct in Paris last month, the OECD published a series of letters clarifying banks' human rights responsibilities under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The letters date from November and December 2013, but have now been published for the first time.

The letters have far-reaching implications for banks, which have in some cases sought to play down their responsibilities for human rights abuses caused by companies or projects they help finance.

The UN Guiding Principles, unanimously adopted by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011, and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises state that business enterprises must "avoid causing or contributing to adverse human rights impacts through their own activities, and address such impacts when they occur", and must "seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts that are directly linked to their operations, products or services by their business relationships, even if they have not contributed to those impacts."

However, a 2013 report into current approaches and practices to due diligence in the financial sector found that "FIs view themselves to be indirectly linked to an adverse human rights impact through the financial services they provide to their clients".  By arguing that they were  only "indirectly linked" to impacts they finance, they were seeking to evade any responsibilities to avoid,  prevent, or mitigate such impacts.

No such thing as indirect links to human rights impacts

In one of the letters released by the OECD, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) makes clear that the banks were mistaken in their interpretation, and that "there is either a (direct) link between the products, services or operations of a business enterprise and an adverse impact through a business relationship, or there is no link". Further, the letter makes clear that such a direct link can arise "through business relationships with investee companies, project partners, clients and other entities." 

This clearly establishes that banks do have a responsibility under the OECD Guidelines and the UN Guiding Principles to try to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts caused by their client companies.

Banks can also contribute to human rights impacts through their finance

It is clear that banks can cause human rights impacts through their own activities, for example through discriminating against women or ethnic minorities in their hiring or mortgage provisions. But the OHCHR letter also makes clear that banks can also contribute to adverse human rights impacts through their finance, "such as if financing is provided for a project that will result in widespread displacement of communities, without safeguards in place".

UN conclusions strengthen the case for bank remediation processes

The distinction between contributing to human rights impacts and being directly linked to them through a business relationship is important because it determines what is expected of banks and other businesses according to the OECD Guidelines and the Guiding Principles.

For example, where banks contribute to adverse human rights impacts, the OECD Guidelines and Guiding Principles state that they should "provide for or cooperate in their remediation through legitimate processes". Where a bank has not contributed to such impacts, "the responsibility to respect human rights does not require that the enterprise itself provide for remediation, though it may take a role in doing so."

Currently, there is no sign of banks establishing processes to remedy human rights impacts that they have contributed to. BankTrack is calling on banks to ensure grievance mechanisms are established for projects which present human rights risks, and to establish their own mechanisms that allow rights holders affected by bank financed projects and activities access to remedy. BankTrack is also collaborating with OECD Watch to explore possibilities for using the OECD Guidelines' complaint procedure to incentivise banks to establish such mechanisms.

Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted