BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

ILO Says Brazil Violated Convention 169 in Belo Monte Case

International Labor Organization confirms government violated indigenous rights
2012-03-07 | Brazil
By: Amazon Watch
Contact:

Christian Poirier, Amazon Watch, +1 510 666 > 7565,christian@amazonwatch.org

Caroline Bennett, Amazon Watch, +1 415 487 > 9600,caroline@amazonwatch.org

Brent Millikan, International Rivers, +55 61 8153 > 7009,brent@internationalrivers.org

2012-03-07 | Brazil
By: Amazon Watch
Contact:

Christian Poirier, Amazon Watch, +1 510 666 > 7565,christian@amazonwatch.org

Caroline Bennett, Amazon Watch, +1 415 487 > 9600,caroline@amazonwatch.org

Brent Millikan, International Rivers, +55 61 8153 > 7009,brent@internationalrivers.org

A report released by the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations for the International Labor Organization (ILO) found the Brazilian government directly violated the rights of indigenous communities in the Xingu region of the Amazon while plowing forward with the controversial Belo Monte Dam project. The report shows that by failing to conduct indigenous hearings in villages impacted by the Belo Monte Dam prior to approving the project's construction, Brazil violated Convention 169 which guarantees indigenous peoples the right to free, prior and informed consultation over projects that affect their lands and rights.

According to the ILO document, "the Commission notes that, under Article 15 of the Convention, the government is obliged to consult indigenous peoples before undertaking or permitting any programs for the exploitation of existing resources on their lands," going on to state that Belo Monte would change the navigability of the Xingu, while irrevocably impacting the fauna, flora and climate of the region. These impacts, the ILO said, "go beyond the flooding of land or displacement of these people."

"This is yet another major blow to the international legal and reputational standing of the Brazilian government as it recklessly pursues the construction of the Belo Monte Dam to the detriment of indigenous and traditional peoples of the Xingu," said Christian Poirier, Brazil Program Director at Amazon Watch. "While the Rousseff government seems impervious to all reason surrounding this project, the world continues to call her to task."

The findings of the ILO confirm the position of Brazil's Federal Public Ministry (MPF) and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States, two institutions that have condemned the Brazilian government for failure to hold indigenous hearings and have demanded the project's suspension.

The findings also invalidate the ruling of Brazil's Federal Circuit  Court TRF1 that held that indigenous hearings could occur at any time, even after their communities have suffered Belo Monte's irreversible impacts. Contradicting the TRF1, the Commission states that "according to the documentation and information submitted by the government, the procedures carried out so far...do not meet the requirements set out in Articles 6 and 15 of the Convention, nor do they demonstrate that indigenous peoples were allowed to participate effectively in determining their priorities in accordance with Article 7 of the Convention." The legal case against Belo Monte is expected to reach Brazil's Supreme Court.

In final recommendations the ILO's Committee of Experts asks the Brazilian government to:

  • Take the necessary measures to carry out consultations with the affected indigenous communities, in accordance with Articles 6 and15 of the Convention on the construction of the Belo Monte Dam, before the possible harmful effects of that plant are irreversible.
  • In consultation with indigenous peoples, take steps to determine whether the priorities of these peoples were respected and their interests will be adversely affected and to what extent, in order to adopt appropriate mitigation and compensation.
  • Inform the Federal Court of Pará about the results of the procedure.

More on ILO Convention 169:

The Convention Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples - 169 Convention - was ratified by Brazil in 2002 and enacted through a presidential decree in 2004. Convention 169 establishes, among other things, that indigenous and tribal peoples have the right to be consulted in a free, prior and informed manner about state actions that may affect their property or rights.

Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Belo Monte dam

Brazil
Project
On record
Hydroelectric Power Generation

Belo Monte dam

Brazil
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted