Banks| Policies| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-01-23 00:00:00
Berta Cáceres: new rules for banks could help stop defender killings
2023-01-16 00:00:00
In the balance: Why European due diligence legislation must cover financial services
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Exposed: Western banks funding Qatar’s carbon bombs
2022-12-08 00:00:00
Right-wing attack on sustainable finance is the latest form of climate denial
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
2022-10-13 15:56:39
More major banks and insurers refuse to support EACOP
2022-09-16 10:38:48
European Parliament passes emergency resolution against human rights violations & environmental threats linked to EACOP
2022-06-27 09:49:16
Crédit Agricole takes first step to phase out from the oil and gas sector
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Home › News
Banking on bailouts
Sizing the global costs when the fossil fuel bubble bursts
Start

By: One-for-One campaign
2023-01-11

Share this page:

Banking on Bailouts report. Photo: One-for-One
Go to:
Start

Republished from the original news item on the One-for-One-campaign website here.

Academics and economists have raised the alarm for many years about the growing risk of a fossil fuel stranded asset bubble. This means investments in oil, gas or coal exploration and extraction projects could suddenly have their value wiped out as demand drops as a result of climate change mitigation policies, changes in consumer preferences, and technology developments. A sudden drop in the value of fossil fuel assets could cause borrowers to default on their debts, in turn leaving banks and insurers insolvent and causing knock-on effects across the financial markets.

Despite the clear threat of climate change and the urgent necessity of meeting net zero targets, banks and insurers around the world continue to finance new fossil fuel projects, through lending, insurance, and both direct and indirect investment. While efforts have been made to shore up the stability of the global financial system since the 2008 global financial crisis, regulators are lagging behind in implementing rules that adequately mitigate the risks of climate change and net zero on banks and insurers.

Under the One-for-One campaign’s policy demands a 1,250% risk weighting for capital requirements should be applied all financing of new fossil fuel exploration and extraction projects such that for every dollar invested in fossil fuels, financial institutions have one dollar to cover the risk. The campaign also calls for a 150% risk weighting to applied to existing fossil fuel assets.

These measures will prevent the buildup of systemic climate risk across the financial sector by raising the costs of providing capital for fossil fuel financing relative to clean energy, incentivizing investment in the net zero transition and discouraging new fossil fuel production. Crucially, the rules will also protect against a global financial crisis stemming from a collapse in the value of fossil fuel assets, as banks and insurers will have the capital buffers in place to absorb any losses.

This report gives a global estimate, relative to the 2008 housing market crisis, of how devastating a financial crash may be in terms of job losses and the impact on public finances when the anticipated fossil fuel bubble bursts, unless capital requirement regulations are tightened.

While the actual date of the crisis and exactly how it will unfold in the markets is impossible to forecast, the report takes 2030 as the presumed year of the crash. The report also takes in two scenarios for global warming – either a trajectory that sees 2°C of global temperature rise by the end of the century, or 3.5 °C. The report finds that, without robust capital requirements in place, the socioeconomic impacts of a fossil-fuel led financial crisis will be severe, with over 13.6 million job losses expected and a global bailout of $4.9 trillion required to keep banks afloat, taking 2030 as the presumed date of the crash and under a 2°C global warming scenario.

The complete report can be downloaded here.

See also this article from The Guardian: UK could face ‘banking crisis worse than 2008’ if City fails to prepare for fossil fuel collapse.

Browse
Home
Banks
Policies
Dodgy Deals
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook
Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Twitter Fossil Banks No Thanks Instagram
Affiliate Websites
Fossil Banks No Thanks
StopEACOP
Forests & Finance
Banks & Biodiversity
Drop JBS
Bank of Coal
Don't Buy into Occupation
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted