BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Dodgy Deals ›
Dodgy Deal
Mochovce nuclear power plant (units 3 & 4)Slovakia

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

Jan Haverkamp, Greenpeace Central & Eastern Europe, Praha
Elvira Poschko, Antiatom Szene, Austria

Last update: 2016-10-06 23:58:27

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

Jan Haverkamp, Greenpeace Central & Eastern Europe, Praha
Elvira Poschko, Antiatom Szene, Austria

Last update: 2016-10-06 23:58:27
Why this profile?

What must happen

A nuclear power plant that is scheduled to start operation in 2013-2014 and run for decades must be built in accordance with the best available safety standards. Using a design and technology that are already almost 40 years old by definition fails to deliver a comfortable level of nuclear security, particularly after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. The need for this additional energy producing capacity should be critically reviewed and assessed. Before turning to the nuclear energy option, which carries a high-risk long-term potential for causing serious health hazards and environmental disasters, the Slovak government should look for the opportunities in improving energy efficiency and increasing renewable energy generation capacity.

About
Sectors Nuclear Electric Power Generation
Location

The building of Slovakia's Mochovce 3 and 4 nuclear reactors is the longest running nuclear construction project anywhere in Europe. The reactors were designed by the Soviet Union back in the 1970s. Construction began back in 1987 but in 1992, soon after the collapse of the communist regime, it was suspended. Economic studies in 2000 showed the project to be a financial disaster.

Although operating since the mid 1980s in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, four of the same model of reactor as Mochovce 3 and 4 under construction in East Germany, were cancelled in 1990 after the German re-unification because the reactors did not meet basic safety standards.

Russia is the only supplier of nuclear fuel for this type of reactor which makes a mockery of the idea that nuclear power provides energy security. An estimated 22 tonnes of spent nuclear fuel is generated by each reactor every year.

The investment required to build Mochovce 3 and 4 is expected to reach 2.775 billion euros. This will devour a massive 77% of SE's investment for new electricity generation 2007 to 2013. Due to the high financial risks for investors, the Slovak government provides generous state aid that is very likely illegal under EU legislation.

Impacts

Social and human rights impacts

Serious concerns have been raised about the legitimacy of Mochovce 3 and 4's approval, safety issues and poor economics. The project is supposed to be finished on the basis of a permit issued by communist decision makers in 1986.

Since contamination ensuing from any accident would affect neighbouring countries, the people of Hungary and Austria are included in any public consultation. Questions asked at public forums held in Bratislava and Vienna remained unanswered. However, these meetings have revealed that the problem of final storage of high-level radioactive waste remains unsolved, while the commissioning of storage facilities for low and medium-level radioactive waste is being constantly postponed.

No attention for gender effects in EIA
The effects of radiation on vulnerable groups, especially pregnant women and small children, was not taken into account in the Environmental Impact Assessment. Radiation effects were only indicated in general terms.


Environmental and climate impacts

Low Nuclear Safety
Units 3 & 4 of Mochovce, by virtue of their design which dates back to the 1970s, qualify among the most outdated NPP projects in Europe at present. The outdated Soviet technologies on which it relies are missing crucial safety systems according to modern standards. The advanced stage of construction allows only limited modifications and improvements ('retrofitting') to the nuclear safety of the plant.

While current reactor designs feature double containment structures (robust walls of concrete and steel against leakage of radioactivity in case of heavy accidents, and for protection of the reactor against external events such as an airplane crash), Mochovce 3&4 has none. In addition, vulnerability to seismic activity is a weakness in the safety design of VVER 440/213 units. It is not clear whether Mochovce 3 and 4 complies with the latest seismic design standards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Preventing climate protection
Slovakia is a classical example where nuclear power is preventing the development of clean renewable energy solutions and is a barrier to energy efficiency measures. The amount of nuclear generated base-load in the Slovak electricity grid is so high, that proposed investments in wind energy projects by the utility ENEL had to be canceled.

Because of the need to sell the overload of capacity from its nuclear power stations, Slovakia has only marginally invested in energy efficiency measures in the electricity sector.


Other impacts

Nuclear risk export
In a plebiscite in 1987 Italy decided to close down all of its nuclear reactors due to safety concerns. This decision was confirmed after a referendum on nuclear in June 2011 when 90% of Italians said no to nuclear energy. As the Italian government has a 30% stake in ENEL, the utility company's engagement with the Mochovce 3&4 project is a clear example of nuclear risk export.

Financiers
Institution type
Finance type
Year

In 1993 the EBRD was approached by the Slovak government to help with the financing of units 1 and 2. EBRD commenced a comprehensive environmental assessment and least-cost study process. However, in 1995 the Slovak government decided to discontinue negotiations with the EBRD, citing as reasons the high cost of the loan and the condition imposed by EBRD to close down Slovakia's other NPP, Bohunice.

In October 2007 ENEL/Slovenské elektrárne (SE) announced the conclusion of a record corporate 7-year credit facility, totalling Euro 800 million from a consortium of international private banks, including ING, Calyon, Mizuho, Intesa San Paolo and KBC/CSOB (Mandated Lead Arrangers), Slovenská sporitelna (Lead Arranger), Komercní banka Praha, Komercná banka Bratislava and Dexia (Junior Arrangers).

85% of SE's investment portfolio exists of the Mochovce 3,4 nuclear power plant. The remaining 15% is smaller than 800 Million Euro. It is therefore clear that this corporate loan was at least partly meant for financing this project.

In January 2008, NGO campaigning scored an important success: the Dutch bank ING decided to withdraw from financing the commissioning of Mochovce NPP units 3 & 4, and to invest only in SE's other activities, such as energy efficiency improvement measures.

In April 2008 Erste bank followed suit by officially distancing itself from Mochovce NPP. The new agreement reached with SE is that the loan provided by the consortium of banks would not be used in any way for financing nuclear activities.

In november 2010, SE boasted in a public presentation that actually a "multi-purpose loan facility, secured by corporate cash flow, supplemented required funds" for the complemetion of Mochovce 3&4.

In March 2012, Bank Austria confirmed that it has closed down a financial facility to SE that could have been used for Mochovce 3&4.

 

Companies

ENEL

Italy
Website

OMZ (Uralmash-Izhora Group)

Russian Federation
Website

Slovenské elektrárne

Slovakia
Website

VUJE

Slovakia
Website

Škoda JS

Czech Republic
Website
No companies
News
BankTrack
Partners
Blog
External
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Enel Nuclear Building Permit Violated Law, Slovak Court Says

2013-08-21 | Bloomberg
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Sme: State remains silent over Mochovce agreement

2013-04-03 | The Solvak Spectator
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

BankTrack welcomes withdrawal Bank Austria from Mochovce Nuclear power plant

Bank Austria closes credit line to Slevenske Elektrarne, enabling the construction of Mochovce nuclear reactors 3&4
2012-03-15 | Nijmegen | BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Bank Austria withdraws from Mochovce Nuclear Plant

2012 | BankTrack
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

BankTrack calls on banks to stop funding nuclear power

New website exposes nuclear secrets of commercial banks
2010-05-26 | Nijmegen, the Netherlands | BankTrack
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Nuclear plant EIA is completed

2010-05-17 | The Slovak Spectator
Blog
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

ING Withdraws from Slovak Nuclear Project

Mochovce 3 and 4 too risky
2008-01-29 | Amsterdam / Brussels | Urgewald
Resources
Documents
Videos
Links
2010-11-24 00:00:00

SE presentation on Mochovce 3&4

Company document
2010-11-24 00:00:00 | Slovenske Elektrarne
2009-11-25 00:00:00

RESPONSE ON THE EIA REPORT MOCHOVCE 3,4 answers on questions

NGO document
2009-11-25 00:00:00 | Jan Haverkamp - Greenpeace
2009-11-10 00:00:00

Doplnenie Správy o hodnotení navrhovanej činnosti „Atómová elektráreň Mochovce VVER 4 x 440 MW. 3 stavba“ o odpovede na otázky

Company document
2009-11-10 00:00:00 | SE
2009-09-20 00:00:00

COMMENTS ON THE EIA REPORT MOCHOVCE 3,4

NGO document
2009-09-20 00:00:00 | Jan Haverkamp - Greenpeace
2009-08-01 00:00:00

Mochovce Nuclear Power Plant - clean new power

Company document
2009-08-01 00:00:00 | SE
2009-07-01 00:00:00

Environmental Impact Assessment Report

Company document
2009-07-01 00:00:00 | SE
2008-07-15 00:00:00

EC Opinion on Mochovce 3&4

Other document
2008-07-15 00:00:00 | European Commission
2008-04-24 00:00:00

Mochovce 3+4: The Ghost of Soviet Nuclear

Other document
2008-04-24 00:00:00 | The Greens - European Free Alliance in the European Parliament
2008-04-11 00:00:00

The use of decommissioning fund arrangements in Slovakia as financial advantage for the Mochovce 3 and 4 project

NGO document
2008-04-11 00:00:00 | Jan Beranek, Jan Haverkamp / Greenpeace
2007-10-22 00:00:00

SE press release on corporate credit facility

Company document
2007-10-22 00:00:00 | Slovenské elektrárne
2007-04-01 00:00:00

Safety issues for Mochovce 3 & 4 nuclear units

NGO document
2007-04-01 00:00:00 | Dalibor Stráský / Greenpeace

Enel nuclear power plants

Promotion video of Enel about two nuclear reactors in Slovakia: Bohunice and Mochovce
2010-03-03 10:33:14

The ghosts of soviet nuclear - The case of Mochovce

A film on the investment of Italian electricity firm Enel in Slovakia. The film, which was first shown at the Green conference "World energy solutions: Switch to green power" in Rome, points out how unsafe, uneconomical, potentially illegal, undemocratic and unsustainable the Enel projects at units 3 and 4 of the nuclear reactor in Mochovce are.
2009-11-12 12:58:56

Nuclear Fallout - Slovakia

The Austrian/Slovakian border has become the environmental frontline where East meets West in a fight for green priorities. Still suffering from the aftermath of Chernobyl, Austrians are not prepared to put-up with a new nuclear power plant in neighbouring Slovakia. But for the Slovak's, the Mochovce nuclear reactor is their ticket to a nation abundant in cheap electricity.
2009-11-12 10:59:27

Mochovce Nuclear Power Plant official webpage

On Slovenske Elektrarne's website

Mochovce Plant Virtual Tour

This is a virtual tour through the Mochovce NPP. (To start the tour, close the welcome screen by clicking the X.)
Updates

2012

2012-03-13 00:00:00 | Bank Austria withdraws from Mochovce 3&4

In March 2012, Bank of Austria closed down a credit line to Slovenske Elektrarne that could have enabled the company to fund the buiding of Mochovce 3&4 by mutual agreement. This sends a clear signal to SE on the difficulty of funding such a dodgy deal.

2012-01-01 00:00:00 | Construction started but funding not sure

The constructions of Mochovce 3&4 started on the ground but it is still unclear if SE would need additional funding sources to be able to fund the completion of these new nuclear reactors.

2010

2010-05-01 00:00:00 | Final statement of approval on EIA

 

In May 2010, Slovenské Elektrárne, (SE) received the final statement of approval from the Environment Ministry for the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for operation of the third and fourth units of the Mochovce nuclear power plant. This was the last step in the EIA process initiated at the end of 2008. The statement released by the Environment Ministry ends the EIA process and is one of the key documents necessary for the Nuclear Supervision Office (UJD) to issue a permit to launch the operation of the third and fourth units after their completion in 2012 and 2013.

2009

2009-07-01 00:00:00 | First EIA report

After heavy pressure from Greenpeace, Slovak NGOs, the Government of Austria and the European Commision, Slovak authorities decided in Summer 2008 that the Mochovce 3&4 project would need a full Environmental Impact Assessment. In early 2009, SE / ENEL started the EIA procedure. The first report was issued in July 2009, when a public participation period started. Public hearings were organised in Bratislava, Vienna (Austria) and Ezstergom (Hungary).

2008

2008-11-03 00:00:00 | Official start of the construction

On 3 November 2008, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fice officially started construction of the Mochvoce 3&4 power station. Because of the fact that there is no final construction permit as of today, this action rather served as PR exercise.

2008-08-25 00:00:00 | Tender for builders

On 25 August 2008 Slovak power firm Slovenske Elektrarne (SE) launched a tender to find a builder to finish blocks 3 and 4 of Mochovce NPP. The deadline for final bids is 8 December 2008; construction works on units 3&4 was expected to start on 1 April 2009 and finish by the end of June 2011 (Reuters, 25 August 2008), while it is still going on in 2012. The tender was won by a consortium with Czech / Russian nuclear engineer Skoda JS and Slovak VUJE.

2008-07-01 00:00:00 | Conditioned opinion from European Commission

In July 2008, the European Commission issued a conditioned opinion on Slovakia's application to build new reactors at Mochovce, provoking indignant reactions from European Parliament MPs and Greenpeace. The opinion recommends, but does not oblige, the project proponent to ensure "an equivalent level of protection as a full containment" and to perform a thorough analysis of the measures needed in an aircraft crash scenario.

Send feedback on this profile
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted