BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Dodgy Deals ›
Dodgy Deal
Batoka Gorge damZimbabwe

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

Johan Frijns, BankTrack

Last update: 2016-11-01 15:23:00

Project – On record

This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Lead organisation:
BankTrack
Contact:

Johan Frijns, BankTrack

Last update: 2016-11-01 15:23:00
Why this profile?

What must happen

Building the Batoka Gorge dam on a basin that is susceptible to hydrological changes and whose past climatic patterns cannot be mirrored for future hydrological patterns is not viable. All dams need to be well managed to ensure optimisation of the existing dams for environmental flows downstream from the Cahora Bassa before considering new hydropower stations.

About
Sectors Hydroelectric Power Generation
Location

The proposed Batoka Gorge Dam will be built on the Zambezi River main stem, approximately 54 kilometres downstream of the Victoria Falls, between Zambia and Zimbabwe. If built, the Batoka Gorge will be the third largest dam on the river after the two downstream dams, Kariba and Cahora Bassa. The existing dams on the Zambezi River have caused many hydrological changes to the lower Zambezi sections including the Zambezi delta.

The 181-metre-high Batoka dam wall will hold back 1,680 million cubic metres of water, covering an area of approximately 26 square kilometres. The reservoir will stretch to just about 1 kilometre from the plunge pool of the Victoria Falls. The estimated cost of the project is USD four billion and will take 10-13 years to complete. 

Impacts

Social and human rights impacts

Even though the dam is not associated with much human displacement, the social impacts will be significant. The Victoria Falls rapids represent one of the world’s best rafting spots, according to the International Rafting Federation. Water sports such as rafting and jet-boating, and land-based tourism to view the gorge scenery and Victoria Falls have created a huge tourism market, contributing to the economies of both countries as well as creating steady, long-term employment for thousands of local people. It is feared that the reservoir may not create the same amount of tourism-related benefits. Jobs resulting from dam construction will be short-term and most local people will not qualify for the highly skilled jobs associated with the project.  

It is doubtful that the local communities will benefit much from the dam. The narrow and deep nature of the reservoir may not sustain large populations of fish needed to form a viable fishery. There is no information yet on how surrounding rural communities could benefit, nor have plans been advanced for connecting them to the resultant electricity grid.


Environmental and climate impacts

The Batoka Gorge Dam's first Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was carried out in 1993. The study recommended further environmental studies, which were then carried out in 1998. The dam will not inundate land since it will be confined to a long narrow gorge, but will flood all the rapids upstream and reduce the riverine natural habitat. The low settlement density in the area will minimize the number of people that need to be resettled. The gorge is a habitat for a number of rare bird species, and the project is expected to have major impacts on local endangered species. Birdlife International lists the Batoka Gorge as an 'Important Bird Area' on the basis of its conservation importance. Four species of note breed in the gorge, including the Taita falcon (a small, agile endangered raptor). Another 34 raptor species are also found in the gorge, including rare birds of prey such as Verraux's eagle (previously known as the black eagle). Since 1989, the area of the Victoria Falls is recognised as an UNESCO World Heritage Site. This area therefore needs to be protected and not damaged by the dam's impact.


Other impacts

The Zambezi River basin has one of the most variable climates in the world. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Zambezi River basin is predicted to experience the worst potential effects of climate change among 11 major African river basins. Extensive research shows that climate change is expected to increase variability and vulnerability of the basin, and the Batoka dam is likely to lose 6-22% production due to declining rainfall as a result of warming climate in the basin. It is therefore very unlikely that the dam will deliver the expected service over its lifetime.

Financiers
Institution type
Finance type
Year

Both the World Bank and the African Development Bank have expressed interest in funding the project. The World Bank has supplied money for feasibility and updating of the Social and Environmental Impact Assessment.

Companies

Black Crystal Consulting

Zimbabwe
Website
Conducted Environmental Impact Assessments.

ERM (Environmental Resources Management)

United Kingdom
Website

Kaizen Consulting

Canada
Website

Studio Pietrangeli

Italy
Website
Contracted as main designer.

Zambezi River Authority

Zimbabwe
Website
No companies
News
BankTrack
Partners
Blog
External
BankTrack news BankTrack blog Partner news Partner blog

Batoka Gorge power project finally starts

2016-04-21 | The Southern Times
Resources
Documents
Links
2014-03-15 00:00:00

Batoka Gorge Dam, Zambezi River

Flooding out a Natural Wonder
NGO document
2014-03-15 00:00:00 | International Rivers

A risky climate for Southern Africa

Batoka HES Project - Zambezi River Authority

Updates

2016

2016-08-02 00:00:00 | Batoka Gorge Dam

There is an ongoing social and environmental impact assessment for the Batoka. The Zimbabwean government is currently discussing funding prospects with China.

It has been reported that communities were not openly invited to meetings during the Social and Environmental Impact Assessment consultations and claims (not substantiated) have been made that one chief on the Zambian side dissuaded communities from speaking out against Batoka.

Send feedback on this profile
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted