BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
20 years of BankTrack – Our history
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-09-18 00:00:00
New report and blog: Barclays' bond with Adani
2023-08-23 00:00:00
Decarbonization: steel not making the cut
2023-07-27 00:00:00
Two months ago 62 organizations and 3 Goldman Environmental Prize winners wrote an Open Letter to the TNFD: No one responded
2023-07-13 00:00:00
The Sustainable Steel Principles: One step forward when leaps are needed
2023-09-15 17:34:10
The number of major banks refusing to support EACOP reaches 24
2023-07-31 14:30:01
Equator Principles recognise projects’ risk to climate for the first time
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
Connect
2023-09-18 00:00:00
Barclays' bond with Adani
2023-06-26 00:00:00
How should financiers align with the Global Biodiversity Framework? Five Key Principles
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
End Coal Finance
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Banks and steel
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack 20 years of BankTrack – Our history Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

The Green Central Banking Scorecard: 2022 edition

2022-11-22
By: Positive Money
Contact:

press@positivemoney.org.uk

Photo: Positive Money
2022-11-22
By: Positive Money
Contact:

press@positivemoney.org.uk

The 2022 Green Central Banking Scorecard updates Positive Money’s ranking of G20 central banks and prudential regulators based on their environmental credentials, to show which countries are leading the way, and which are falling behind.

Central banks are operating in a period of multiple, overlapping crises, yet are failing to use all the tools at their disposal to deal with these emergencies. The acute physical impacts of climate change are materialising globally, with droughts, floods, wildfires and heat waves causing significant economic, social, and human damage. Simultaneously, inflation, driven by the volatile price of fossil fuels, has highlighted that the transition to renewable energy can no longer be delayed.

The report argues that the events of this year demonstrate the ways in which the environmental crisis can undermine the basic conditions for price and financial stability and jeopardise central banks’ ability to fulfil their core mandates. It also warns that interest rate rises risk choking off capital-intensive green investments whilst doing little to address supply-side inflation. While progress has been made since the 2021 edition (particularly in the ‘Research and Advocacy’ category), other than the Banque de France, all G20 central banks and financial regulators continue to score Grade C+ and below.

 

11525
scorecard2022table.jpg
center
Green banking scorecard 2022.
Photo: Positive Money

 

Leaders and laggards

  • The Eurosystem central banks (France, Germany, Italy, and the ECB) have topped the Scorecard due to their leadership on greening monetary policy. The ECB has committed to limit the amount of carbon intensive assets financial institutions can pledge as collateral, as well as decarbonising its own asset purchasing schemes. Senior figures from the ECB have also been discussing the potential for a green lending scheme.
  • Japan and China both have green lending schemes, yet have been held back by their failure to decarbonise their monetary policy. China has increased its support for coal over the past year, with billions of Renminbi provided by the People’s Bank of Canada for coal lending. Japan continues to keep fossil fuel assets in its collateral frameworks and asset purchasing schemes.
  • Despite the Federal Reserve’s recent commitment to conduct a climate scenario analysis in 2023, the US is trailing behind in 16th place. Compared to other economies with high levels of large historical emissions, the US is a laggard on climate-related monetary and financial policy.
  • The UK has just held on to its 5th place position due to keeping pace with the ECB on financial regulation and disclosures. The Bank of England will have to be more ambitious on greening monetary policy to stay in the top 5.
  • Brazil, home to the world’s largest tropical rainforest, has slipped from second place to joint sixth due to the central bank’s relatively slow progress in implementing its  formal commitments, and India has also fallen one place to 12th position.

Key recommendations for central banks

Research and advocacy: Central banks and financial regulators should promote and adopt the precautionary approach and a double materiality framework to manage environmental risks. G20 central banks with the greatest historic contribution to climate change should bear the most responsibility for action.

Monetary policy: Central banks should green and expand monetary policy toolkits by creating green lending facilities and negatively screening for environmentally harmful activities in asset purchasing programmes and collateral frameworks.

Financial regulation: Financial regulators should actively supervise environmental risks by adapting capital requirements and implementing limits on lending to the most environmentally destructive projects and companies. Financial institutions should be required to show supervisors how they will transition with credible short term targets.

Leading by example: Central banks should lead the way by aligning their own non-monetary policy portfolios with the Paris Agreement and environmental goals.

 

Notes:

The original press release can be accessed here.

An interactive version of the scorecard is available here.

The full report can be downloaded here.

Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA End Coal Finance Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Banks and steel Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack 20 years of BankTrack – Our history Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2023 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted