BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
International Bank Campaigners Gathering
Donate
2023-05-25 00:00:00
Philippines communities are fighting back against gas & LNG build-out in the Verde Island Passage
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
Connect
2023-06-01 00:00:00
BankTrack's submission to the public consultation on TNFD V0.4
2023-05-03 00:00:00
A Rotten Business: How Barclays became the go-to bank for JBS, one of the world's most destructive meat corporations
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
End Coal Finance
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

One Step up, challenges Ahead

Report and Statement see both progress and challenges at 2nd Anniversary of Equator Principles
2005-06-06 | Utrecht, the Netherlands
By: Friends of the Earth US
Contact:

Utrecht, Netherlands: BankTrack, Johan Frijns, +31-6-12421667, +31-30-2334343
San Francisco, USA: Friends of the Earth US, Michelle Chan-Fishel +1 202 427 3000

2005-06-06 | Utrecht, the Netherlands
By: Friends of the Earth US
Contact:

Utrecht, Netherlands: BankTrack, Johan Frijns, +31-6-12421667, +31-30-2334343
San Francisco, USA: Friends of the Earth US, Michelle Chan-Fishel +1 202 427 3000

The Equator banks have improved their record in implementing and applying the Equator Principles but their effect on the ground remains unclear, concludes a new BankTrack report on the Equator Principles (EP), a bank-led initiative to establish common environmental and social standards for project finance that was launched two years ago.

The report, titled ‘One Step up; not time to pause, The Equator Principles at age two’,  reviews EP banks’ efforts on the implementation and application of the Principles. The review is based solely on what EP banks have publicly disclosed, as this is the only basis on which civil society is able to judge banks’ progress.

The report notes some positive developments, such as the decision of six banks – ABN AMRO, Barclays, Citigroup, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, and Westpac – to expand the scope of EPs, to transactions that fall under the $50 million threshold, and/or to certain corporate loans. In addition, ABN AMRO, HSBC, ING, and Westpac all reported that the EPs played a role in the bank either declining or putting extra environmental conditions on projects.

However, the report also finds that transparency regarding EP implementation has been lacking.  Although rates and quality of EP reporting have improved compared to last year, the vast majority of adopting banks (80%) provide limited or no disclosure, thus undercutting public confidence in the EPs.
Also like last year, implementation of the EPs has varied greatly among banks.  While a few banks have made significant efforts, less than half reported creating new procedures, standards, tools, etc. to implement the EPs.  Moreover, it appears that at least four banks -- Banco Bradesco, BBVA, EKF, and MCC -- do not have existing systems to manage environmental/social credit risks, which reduces the ability of these institutions to “mainstream” the EPs into existing operations.

“We welcome the handful of banks that are really trying to follow the ‘spirit of Equator,” but they do not offset the practices of others that have failed to demonstrate that they are even following the ‘letter of Equator’,” said Johan Frijns, coordinator of BankTrack, an international network of advocacy NGOs monitoring the financial sector.  “Unless all Equator banks provide timely evidence that they are
making a good faith effort to implement Principles, the EPs risk becoming greenwash.” 

“We are still hopeful about the Equator Principles, but our patience is wearing thin,” said Michelle Chan-Fishel of Friends of the Earth – US, a BankTrack member.  “It’s too early to tell whether the Principles improving the lives of local communities, but it’s too late for banks to still be doing business as usual.”

An accompanying Statement issued by BankTrack points out that the EPs are at a critical stage: While there are some promising signs among certain Equator banks, the EPs still face accountability problems, which if remain unchecked, could create serious problems in the future. The Statement also mentions several controversial deals that will test the Principles, particularly the Sakhalin II project, which according to an earlier BankTrack study violates the EPs on several counts.

BankTrack notes that two years after the EP launch, several key project finance banks, such as BNP Paribas, Societe Generale and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking continue to opt out. At the same time, the development of other environmental and social financing standards has challenged the Equator Principles’ leadership.

“BankTrack has welcomed the launch of new environmental and social financing standards that have been developed in the past year,” said Frijns, referring to recent standards such as HSBC’s freshwater policy which is based on World Commission on Dams recommendations, and the weapons financing policies of KBC, ING, Dexia and Fortis.  “As banks develop new policies addressing issues like human rights or specific sectors, the Equator Principles become less of a vanguard for sustainability and more of a minimum expectation for project finance banks.”

Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel End Coal Finance Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted