BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-02-07 00:00:00
What COP15 means for banks: meeting the Global Biodiversity Framework requires protecting Indigenous rights and divesting from harmful industries
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
2023-02-24 13:46:14
Pego power station conversion plans halted
2022-12-14 11:08:26
HSBC announces it will no longer finance new oil and gas fields
Connect
2022-11-22 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice: Two years in the heat
2022-11-17 00:00:00
BankTrack Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
2022-10-21 00:00:00
Burning forests in the name of clean energy? How banks are failing to exclude the harmful wood biomass industry from finance
2022-06-28 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 3
2022-04-05 00:00:00
The BankTrack Human Rights Benchmark Asia
2022-03-30 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Laos hydropower project deprives villagers of water, food, income

2010-04-07 | Bangkok
By: Ikuko Matsumoto
Contact:

ikuko@internationalrivers.org

2010-04-07 | Bangkok
By: Ikuko Matsumoto
Contact:

ikuko@internationalrivers.org

Back in November, I visited Navan Tai village on the Xe Bang Fai River in Laos. The morning sun shone down on a bustle of activity. The surface was scattered with small fishing boats as people cast nets into the sparkling waters. Women and children were bathing, while a couple of young boys showed off daring dives.

Last month I returned, but the morning scene had completely changed. There were no fishing boats to be seen. The riverbank was underwater and nobody was bathing.

Locals told me the water level had increased by 2.5 metres over the past two days. Why? Because on March 15, the Nam Theun 2 Hydropower Project began full operations for the first time.

The power-generation scheme has been launched in violation of legal obligations to provide compensation and livelihood support to affected communities. The Xe Bang Fai River is particularly impacted because the project is diverting six Olympic swimming pools of water per minute into the river.

More than 120,000 people living along the river will be affected by Nam Theun 2. Already it is blocking villagers' access to clean water and destroying essential food sources, including fisheries and riverbank vegetable gardens, without appropriate compensation. The villagers are also concerned about more severe flooding and riverbank erosion caused by water released from the dam.

The Nam Theun 2 Power Company has warned communities not to drink the river water because it is contaminated. Yet replacement wells are not functioning, nor is the groundwater suitable for domestic consumption. The water colour has changed to brown and many villagers have little choice but to continue using water from the river.

"The company promised to find a solution for drinking water years ago, but there is no solution yet," a resident of Boeung Xe village told me.

NO COMPENSATION

Riverbank gardens are a major source of income and food for most of the riparian villagers. In March, I could not find one person in the four villages I visited who had been compensated yet for their flooded riverbank gardens, although the World Bank's resettlement policy says no land should be taken before compensation is paid.

What's more, serious erosion has been occurring downstream along the Xe Bang Fai River as a result of the fluctuating water levels since December, when the power company began test operations. Once again, no compensation has been paid for the riverbank gardens that were washed away.

The villagers - many of whom rely on fishing for food and income - also told me fish had disappeared from the river since the dam started operating. In the peak season in May and June, a fisherman in Navan Tai Village can expect to catch about 40-50 kg of fish per day, earning $100-$150. But each household is entitled to only $100-$250 in compensation for fishery and other losses that may last a lifetime.

Villagers are also worried about more frequent, deeper and longer-lasting floods. One resident of Boeung Xe told me: "We are seriously concerned that water released from the dam will cause more severe flooding of our rice fields and tobacco gardens. In the beginning, the company said they would build the infrastructure to avoid floods. But now they have said they don't have money to protect the river banks."

The World Bank stated on March 24 that a comprehensive compensation and mitigation program has been under implementation for several years, and the project has robust monitoring through which its impacts and progress are being tracked.

But if that is true, why do the villagers say they have not been compensated, and why are they so concerned about the future?

The World Bank, Asian Development Bank and other project funders promised that the Lao people would be better off as a result of Nam Theun 2. The results to date are not encouraging.

If the project's backers are serious about ensuring its success, funding needs to be increased dramatically for the downstream compensation programme and support to develop alternative livelihoods must be rapidly scaled up.

Construction on Nam Theun 2 may have been completed, but the work of rebuilding local people's lives has only just begun.

Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Nam Theun 2 dam

Laos
Project
On record
Hydroelectric Power Generation

Nam Theun 2 dam

Laos
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted