BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
International Bank Campaigners Gathering
Donate
2023-05-25 00:00:00
Philippines communities are fighting back against gas & LNG build-out in the Verde Island Passage
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
Connect
2023-05-03 00:00:00
A Rotten Business: How Barclays became the go-to bank for JBS, one of the world's most destructive meat corporations
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
2023-03-29 00:00:00
BankTrack Annual Report 2022
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
End Coal Finance
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Environmental Groups Urge Exxon Executive to Re-route Sakhalin I Oil Pipeline

2008-07-09 | San Francisco, US
By: Pacific Environment
Contact:
    Aleksey Knizhnikov, WWF Russia, + 7 (495) 727 0939, aknizhnikov@wwf.ru
Doug Norlen, Pacific Environment +1 (202) 465 1650, dnorlen@pacificenvironment.org

 

2008-07-09 | San Francisco, US
By: Pacific Environment
Contact:
    Aleksey Knizhnikov, WWF Russia, + 7 (495) 727 0939, aknizhnikov@wwf.ru
Doug Norlen, Pacific Environment +1 (202) 465 1650, dnorlen@pacificenvironment.org

 

Twelve US, Russian and international environmental organizations sent a letter today to Exxon Chief Executive Rex Tillerson urging the company to re-route a proposed pipeline away from herding grounds vital for indigenous people and around a bay that is vital for a critically endangered whale population in Russia (see copy of letter below). If the pipeline is built according to current plans, two indigenous groups' livelihoods will be severely harmed and the Western Gray Whale will be further threatened with extinction, according to the groups and several independent reviews.

In Phase Two of the Sakhalin I pipeline, Exxon proposes to build an oil pipeline across the enormous Piltun Lagoon, which provides vital sustenance for the critically endangered Western Gray Whale.  The Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel and two Public Expert Environmental Reviews have expressed strong concerns about the pipeline's impacts on the whales and have urged that the pipeline be rerouted around Piltun Lagoon.  The expert Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel stated:

"Given the precarious state of the western gray whale population, a precautionary approach is essential. We suggest that it would be preferable to develop an alternative option, such as rerouting of the pipeline, to eliminate the potential for disruption of key processes of biological productivity within the Lagoon."

Environmental organizations point to additional expert reviews that concur with the international Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel:

"In addition to the Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel, two additional reviews by independent Russian experts have recommended that Exxon show some precaution and re-route the proposed pipeline around Piltun Lagoon," said Aleksey Knizhnikov, Oil & Gas Environmental Policy Officer, WWF Russia.

The environmental groups' letter to Exxon's Tillerson also challenges a proposal to build an ice dam across Piltun Lagoon to facilitate pipeline construction.  According to the letter:

...roject plans put the fish reserves and entire living ecosystem of Piltun Bay at great risk because the proposed ice bridge, which will act as a dam, will interrupt the natural water exchange between the Sea of Okhotsk and the large, northern part of the bay during the winter and spring of 2008-2009. Close to 2/3 of the bay will be artificially isolated from sea water for several months, until the summer sun finally melts the ice dam. 

The environmental groups' letter also urges Tillerson to re-route the proposed pipeline away from areas used by subsistence indigenous reindeer herders.  According to the letter:

is intended to cross the most important summer reindeer pastures and calving grounds on the island, which have been traditionally used, and are used to this day by a community of herders including both native Uilta and Evenki peoples.  You should be aware that the infrastructure previously built by Exxon on Chaivo Bay has already done enormous damage to the reindeer pastures and calving grounds, and from 2001 to 2006 the domestic reindeer herd shrank by approximately 40% due to a rising number of miscarriages and a falling birth rate. If the planned Piltun pipeline is built through the summer reindeer pastures and calving grounds, the reindeer herds will potentially be decimated, and the Uilta and Evenki peoples risk losing both their livelihoods and their traditional way of life.

The environmental groups are challenging Exxon to change the pipeline route to avoid these impacts and in so doing decrease political risks associated with the project:

"Around the world Exxon is being challenged to be more responsive to environmental concerns.  Sakhalin I is an example of a project where Exxon can reduce project impacts while lowering project risks in this politically unstable environment," said Doug Norlen, Policy Director, Pacific Environment.

The proposed Sakhalin I pipeline, on Sakhalin Island in the Russian Far East, is proposed by Exxon Neftegas Ltd., a project operating company managed by Exxon.

-30-

  The Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel includes world-class scientific experts specializing in whales and marine conservation,  The panel was established by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature to review the impacts of oil and gas projects in the Sakhalin area on the critically endangered Western Gray Whale.  Since the WGWAP's creation, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Export Credit Agencies of the US and UK have withdrawn from consideration billions of dollars in potential financing for the nearby Sakhalin II project. Among scientists, the WGWAP continues to be viewed as a kind of ‘supreme court' of scientific review of the health of, and impacts to the Western Gray Whale.

Dodgy Deals
There are no active project profiles for this item now.

Sakhalin II oil and gas project

Russian Federation
Project
On record
Oil and Gas Extraction

Sakhalin II oil and gas project

Russian Federation

ExxonMobil

United States
Company
active
Oil and Gas Extraction

ExxonMobil

United States
There are no active company profiles for this item now.
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel End Coal Finance Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted